How the EU undermines its climate goals with animal farming subsidies

The EU’s Investment in Carbon-Intensive Farming

The EU aims to make Europe the first climate-neutral continent by 2050 – but has been investing four times as much money into carbon-intensive livestock farming than growing plants, research has found.

More than 80% of subsidies given to farmers through the bloc’s common agricultural policy (CAP) went to animal products in 2013, according to a study published last week in the journal Nature Food: 38% directly and 44% for animal feed. The “vast majority” of CAP subsidies are going towards products that are “driving us to the brink”, said study co-author Paul Behrens, environmental change researcher at Leiden University.

What’s the situation with carbon-intensive farming?

Greenhouse gas emissions from animal farming in the EU made up 17% of the bloc’s total emissions in 2020. This does “more damage to the climate than all cars and vans put together”, according to a Greenpeace analysis of UN Food and Agriculture Organisation data and other research.

“Animal agriculture is one of the leading causes of the accelerating death of wildlife around the world,” said The Guardian’s Europe environment correspondent Ajit Niranjan. Globally, it is responsible for 12%-20% of pollutants warming the planet.

Currently, the CAP subsidy scheme “pays more to farms that occupy more land”, said Niranjan, making farming livestock more attractive than crops as animals take up more space.

This leads to “perverse outcomes for a food transition”, said the study researchers, because the livestock is fed crops that could have fed people. “We’re incentivising the worst-case scenario,” said Behrens.

The estimates for how much of the CAP subsidies go on animal farming are “higher than was previously thought”, because they now account for the subsidies that go on animal feed, said the researchers.

“For example, a French farmer growing wheat for pig or chicken feed will receive a subsidy for that wheat on top of the subsidy received by a livestock farmer in Denmark who imports that feed,” they wrote. “On this basis, we show that CAP support roughly doubles for animal-based foods.”

Will it affect the EU’s climate-neutral pledge?

The EU aims to be climate-neutral by 2050, i.e. with net-zero greenhouse gas emissions.

But in 2020, Greenpeace declared that the scale of the problem of animal farming meant the EU would not reach the goals of the Paris climate agreement.

In the latest CAP reform in 2021, the bloc decided to set aside a quarter of direct payments for “eco-schemes”, to incentivise environmentally friendly farming.

Last summer, the European Parliament voted to update its decade-old Industrial Emissions Directive law package, which was intended to regulate dirty emissions and covers industrial poultry and pig farming. But the vote was “effectively watering down” a previous proposal from the year before, which would have extended the directive to other intensive farming such as cattle, said charity Friends of the Earth.

The vote “missed an opportunity” to bring more industrial animal farms in line with the EU’s environmental ambitions, and left a “significant portion” of animal farms unregulated. In a time of climate crisis, the decision amounted to “letting some of the main polluters off the hook”.

In recent months, European governments have again “watered down several green policies in the face of furious farmer protests“, said Niranjan.

As part of the current revamp of the CAP, 4% of farmland must remain unused to help offset lost crops, following Russia’s invasion of Ukraine. But farmers have “long argued these measures will make the European agricultural sector less competitive,” said the BBC.

Despite opposition from farmers and lobby groups, “these environmental improvements are sorely needed”, said the study researchers.

This year, members of the European parliament voted to ban terms such as “climate neutral”, “environmentally friendly” and “climate neutral” that were used without evidence, and introduced a total ban on using carbon-offsetting schemes to substantiate environmental claims.

Just this week, the EU’s top rights court dismissed two cases aimed at forcing countries to meet obligations to reduce greenhouse gas emissions.

However, it did side with a group of Swiss women in another case, and condemned the country for violating human rights through inaction in the face of the climate crisis.

SDGs, Targets, and Indicators

1. SDG 13: Climate Action

   • Target 13.2: Integrate climate change measures into national policies, strategies, and planning
   • Target 13.3: Improve education, awareness-raising, and human and institutional capacity on climate change mitigation, adaptation, impact reduction, and early warning
   • Indicator: Greenhouse gas emissions from animal farming in the EU

2. SDG 2: Zero Hunger

   • Target 2.4: Ensure sustainable food production systems and implement resilient agricultural practices
   • Indicator: Subsidies given to farmers through the common agricultural policy (CAP)

3. SDG 15: Life on Land

   • Target 15.5: Take urgent and significant action to reduce the degradation of natural habitats
   • Indicator: Impact of animal agriculture on wildlife and pollutants warming the planet

Table: SDGs, Targets, and Indicators

Analysis

1. Which SDGs are addressed or connected to the issues highlighted in the article?

   The issues highlighted in the article are connected to SDG 13: Climate Action, SDG 2: Zero Hunger, and SDG 15: Life on Land.

2. What specific targets under those SDGs can be identified based on the article’s content?

   • Under SDG 13: Climate Action, the specific target is to integrate climate change measures into national policies, strategies, and planning.
   • Under SDG 2: Zero Hunger, the specific target is to ensure sustainable food production systems and implement resilient agricultural practices.
   • Under SDG 15: Life on Land, the specific target is to take urgent and significant action to reduce the degradation of natural habitats.

3. Are there any indicators mentioned or implied in the article that can be used to measure progress towards the identified targets?

   Yes, there are indicators mentioned in the article that can be used to measure progress towards the identified targets:

   • The greenhouse gas emissions from animal farming in the EU can be used as an indicator for measuring progress towards Target 13.2 under SDG 13: Climate Action.
   • The subsidies given to farmers through the common agricultural policy (CAP) can be used as an indicator for measuring progress towards Target 2.4 under SDG 2: Zero Hunger.
   • The impact of animal agriculture on wildlife and pollutants warming the planet can be used as an indicator for measuring progress towards Target 15.5 under SDG 15: Life on Land.

Behold! This splendid article springs forth from the wellspring of knowledge, shaped by a wondrous proprietary AI technology that delved into a vast ocean of data, illuminating the path towards the Sustainable Development Goals. Remember that all rights are reserved by SDG Investors LLC, empowering us to champion progress together.

Source: theweek.com

Join us, as fellow seekers of change, on a transformative journey at https://sdgtalks.ai/welcome, where you can become a member and actively contribute to shaping a brighter future.