Britain has blown its reputation as a world-leader in aid
Britain has blown its reputation as a world-leader in aid The Economist
sdgtalks
Mergers and the Challenges of Integration
Mergers between organizations often face significant challenges and have a high failure rate. Combining two entities with different goals, incompatible IT systems, and management structures can lead to headaches and prove expensive. According to the Harvard Business Review, 70-90% of mergers and acquisitions (M&A) deals fail. The recent merger between the Foreign & Commonwealth Office (FCO) and the Department for International Development (DfID) in 2020 was no exception to these difficulties.
Differing Cultures and Goals
The FCO, with its diplomatic service and an annual budget of £2.4 billion ($3.1 billion), and DfID, with a larger budget but fewer staff, had starkly different cultures. This divide was evident in the choice of footwear, with diplomats wearing smart office shoes and development workers opting for sandals or trainers.
The Significance of the Merger
The success of the expanded Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office (FCDO) carries great importance as Britain seeks a global role post-Brexit. Some view it as an opportunity for a fading power to speak with one voice abroad. Others see it as a hostile takeover aimed at undermining the development sector. The merger has been a subject of debate and controversy.
Challenges Faced by the FCDO
The success of an M&A deal is typically measured by whether the merged entities perform better than before. In this regard, the FCDO has encountered difficulties. It is challenging to assess its foreign-policy achievements, particularly due to the focus on Ukraine. However, the merger has contributed to the perception that Britain’s foreign policy post-Brexit has created barriers against the world.
Impact on Aid Spending
Despite being a significant donor, Britain’s aid spending has faced criticism and divided public opinion. The Conservative Party, in particular, has been divided on the issue. The merger and subsequent budget cuts have reduced aid spending and affected its effectiveness. Less aid is reaching the poorest regions, and Britain’s reputation as a model of aid transparency has suffered.
Costs and Challenges of the Merger
The merger has come with substantial costs, including expenses for integrating the departments and implementing new IT and human-resources systems. Staff morale has declined, and recruitment of top talent has been challenging. However, there are indications that the FCDO is making efforts to improve, with development aid gaining more attention and plans for increased bilateral aid spending.
Future Outlook and Potential Reversal
The Labour Party has expressed intentions to reverse the merger if it comes into power. However, undoing the merger would bring about further challenges, costs, and confusion. It may be more beneficial to focus on resolving the issues within the merged department and improving its performance.
For more expert analysis of the biggest stories in Britain, sign up to Blighty, our weekly subscriber-only newsletter.
SDGs, Targets, and Indicators Analysis
1. Which SDGs are addressed or connected to the issues highlighted in the article?
- SDG 1: No Poverty – The article discusses the allocation of aid budgets and the impact on poverty reduction efforts.
- SDG 5: Gender Equality – The article mentions the lack of data on aid spending for women and girls.
- SDG 8: Decent Work and Economic Growth – The article highlights the cost of the merger and its impact on staff morale and recruitment.
- SDG 10: Reduced Inequalities – The article mentions the distribution of aid to specific regions in Africa and the decrease in aid reaching the poorest places.
- SDG 16: Peace, Justice, and Strong Institutions – The article discusses the perception of barriers being thrown up against the world in Britain’s foreign policy post-Brexit.
2. What specific targets under those SDGs can be identified based on the article’s content?
- Target 1.2: By 2030, reduce at least by half the proportion of men, women, and children of all ages living in poverty in all its dimensions according to national definitions – The article discusses the allocation of aid budgets and its impact on poverty reduction efforts.
- Target 5.c: Adopt and strengthen sound policies and enforceable legislation for the promotion of gender equality and the empowerment of all women and girls at all levels – The article mentions the lack of data on aid spending for women and girls.
- Target 8.5: By 2030, achieve full and productive employment and decent work for all women and men, including for young people and persons with disabilities, and equal pay for work of equal value – The article highlights the impact of the merger on staff morale and recruitment.
- Target 10.3: Ensure equal opportunity and reduce inequalities of outcome, including by eliminating discriminatory laws, policies, and practices and promoting appropriate legislation, policies, and action in this regard – The article mentions the distribution of aid to specific regions in Africa and the decrease in aid reaching the poorest places.
- Target 16.7: Ensure responsive, inclusive, participatory, and representative decision-making at all levels – The article discusses the perception of barriers being thrown up against the world in Britain’s foreign policy post-Brexit.
3. Are there any indicators mentioned or implied in the article that can be used to measure progress towards the identified targets?
- Indicator 1.2.1: Proportion of population living below the national poverty line, by sex and age – This indicator can be used to measure progress towards Target 1.2.
- Indicator 5.c.1: Proportion of countries with systems to track and make public allocations for gender equality and women’s empowerment – This indicator can be used to measure progress towards Target 5.c.
- Indicator 8.5.1: Average hourly earnings of female and male employees, by occupation, age group, and persons with disabilities – This indicator can be used to measure progress towards Target 8.5.
- Indicator 10.3.1: Proportion of population reporting having personally felt discriminated against or harassed in the previous 12 months on the basis of a ground of discrimination prohibited under international human rights law – This indicator can be used to measure progress towards Target 10.3.
- Indicator 16.7.1: Proportions of positions (by sex, age, persons with disabilities, and population groups) in public institutions (national and local legislatures, public service, and judiciary) compared to national distributions – This indicator can be used to measure progress towards Target 16.7.
Table: SDGs, Targets, and Indicators
| SDGs | Targets | Indicators |
|---|---|---|
| SDG 1: No Poverty | Target 1.2: By 2030, reduce at least by half the proportion of men, women, and children of all ages living in poverty in all its dimensions according to national definitions | Indicator 1.2.1: Proportion of population living below the national poverty line, by sex and age |
| SDG 5: Gender Equality | Target 5.c: Adopt and strengthen sound policies and enforceable legislation for the promotion of gender equality and the empowerment of all women and girls at all levels | Indicator 5.c.1: Proportion of countries with systems to track and make public allocations for gender equality and women’s empowerment |
| SDG 8: Decent Work and Economic Growth | Target 8.5: By 2030, achieve full and productive employment and decent work for all women and men, including for young people and persons with disabilities, and equal pay for work of equal value | Indicator 8.5.1: Average hourly earnings of female and male employees, by occupation, age group, and persons with disabilities |
| SDG 10: Reduced Inequalities | Target 10.3: Ensure equal opportunity and reduce inequalities of outcome, including by eliminating discriminatory laws, policies, and practices and promoting appropriate legislation, policies, and action in this regard | Indicator 10.3.1: Proportion of population reporting having personally felt discriminated against or harassed in the previous 12 months on the basis of a ground of discrimination prohibited under international human rights law |
| SDG 16: Peace, Justice, and Strong Institutions | Target 16.7: Ensure responsive, inclusive, participatory, and representative decision-making at all levels | Indicator 16.7.1: Proportions of positions (by sex, age, persons with disabilities, and population groups) in public institutions (national and local legislatures, public service, and judiciary) compared to national distributions |
Behold! This splendid article springs forth from the wellspring of knowledge, shaped by a wondrous proprietary AI technology that delved into a vast ocean of data, illuminating the path towards the Sustainable Development Goals. Remember that all rights are reserved by SDG Investors LLC, empowering us to champion progress together.
Source: economist.com
Join us, as fellow seekers of change, on a transformative journey at https://sdgtalks.ai/welcome, where you can become a member and actively contribute to shaping a brighter future.
