Developing catalysts for a clean fuel future

Researchers Explore New Exhaust Aftertreatment Systems for Heavy-Duty Engines

University of Sheffield leads 4-year project funded by EPSRC grant

Researchers at the University of Sheffield are exploring new exhaust aftertreatment systems for heavy-duty engines capable of running on clean, zero-carbon fuels. This 4-year project is funded by an EPSRC grant and supported by the industrial partner Eminox. The project is led by Bill Nimmo, Professor of Energy Engineering and Sustainability, with PhD student Madhumitha Rajendran.

Background

The decarbonisation of transport represents a vitally important component of global initiatives to minimise the impacts of climate change. However, whilst the electrification of light vehicles is a logical way forward, heavy vehicles used in the rail, marine and construction sectors have high torque requirements that are unsuited to electric power. In addition, diesel engines burn fossil fuels releasing carbon dioxide, a greenhouse gas (GHG), as well as other pollutants, such as nitrogen oxides (NOx). Some oxides of nitrogen are not GHGs but they do perform a role in the formation of tropospheric ozone which is a GHG. Nitrous oxide (N2O) however, is produced by combustion processes, and is a potent GHG.

Alternative solutions are necessary across the entire transport sector, hence the drive toward clean fuel engine development, alongside new exhaust treatment technologies.

New Exhaust Treatment Systems for Heavy-Duty Engines

The research focuses on ammonia as a clean fuel. The first stage involves modeling dual fuel combustion and emission characteristics of ammonia with a carbon-based promoter. Ammonia requires a combustion promoter because of its higher absolute minimum ignition energy than traditional fuels. The second stage of the work will evaluate the NOx reduction efficiencies of commercial catalysts for the ammonia-based dual fuel, utilising a suite of Signal Group gas analysers donated to the project by Eminox.

Why Ammonia?

Ammonia is considered a clean fuel because its (complete) combustion products are nitrogen and water. However, NOx gases are a byproduct of ammonia combustion. Nevertheless, ammonia represents a relatively good energy source and global infrastructure for its production and transportation already exists because of ammonia’s role in agricultural fertilisers.

There are several types of ammonia, each attributed a colour according to its production method. Traditional ammonia is known as ‘grey’ because it uses natural gas, but if carbon capture is used to remove carbon dioxide emissions, the ammonia is labelled ‘blue’. ‘Green’ ammonia is made using green hydrogen, created by electrolysis from renewable energy, so no fossil fuels are required.

In contrast with hydrogen, ammonia does not require cryogenic conditions for transportation as a liquid. Also, ammonia can be produced from hydrogen, and ammonia can be ‘cracked’ back to hydrogen after transportation, which means that ammonia can help resolve the transport issues associated with hydrogen.

Ammonia presents a number of challenges as a fuel for engine combustion. In addition to the requirement for a promoter fuel, these include NOx in the exhaust as well as ammonia slip, which is important because ammonia is both corrosive and toxic, and because unburned fuel represents inefficiency.

Research Phase 1 – Dual Fuel Combustion Modelling

Initial work is being undertaken with ‘Ansys Chemkin-Pro’ a chemical kinetics simulator program that models idealised reacting flows and provides insight into results. Madhumitha has been using the modelling program to investigate predicted effects on engine efficiency and emissions profile, by adjusting a number of different variables, such as stoichiometry, fuel energy shares, and fuel injection parameters. The results of the modelling are being used to inform subsequent work.

Research Phase 2 – Post-Combustion Treatment

The second phase of the research, which is due to commence at the end of 2024, will evaluate the NOx reduction efficiencies of commercially available selective catalytic reduction (SCR) materials under a range of different conditions. Three different SCR catalysts will be trialled, based on zeolite, vanadium oxide and titanium.

The research laboratory in Sheffield contains a controlled temperature furnace reactor using simulated exhaust gases. Catalyst studies will be performed at Sheffield while partners at Brunel University in London will be conducting similar work with a diesel engine test bed; primarily to investigate combustion and fuel injection issues relating to ammonia fuel, but also to help verify exhaust gas composition under a range of conditions. Combined with the kinetic simulation work at Sheffield, realistic exhaust gas composition will be fed to the experimental reactor.

Gas Analysis

The post catalyst exhaust gases will be analysed by the Signal Group analyser rack, after treatment by the catalysts. This instrumentation includes a heated vacuum chemiluminescence gas analyser for the measurement of NOx, NO and NO2. A flame ionisation detector to analyse hydrocarbon levels, and a non-dispersive infrared multi-gas analyser for continuous measurements of carbon monoxide and carbon dioxide. This instrument is also fitted with an oxygen sensor.

Initial Results

So far, modelling work has indicated that the use of an ammonia dual fuel could increase N2O emissions under certain operating conditions, particularly in cold starts. Exhaust gas temperature will reduce, while moisture and hydrogen levels can be expected to increase, and the effects of this on SCR catalyst deNOx efficiency will be studied further.

The model also showed that the utilisation of ammonia dual fuel has a number of implications for prospective SCR catalysts. For example, ammonia in the exhaust can help reduce NOx, and both hydrogen and hydrocarbons in the exhaust can enhance NOx conversion at moderate temperatures. However, N2O will be difficult to decompose at low temperatures. By identifying regimes of operation and emissions, recommendations can be made on catalyst specification and operating conditions to mitigate any operational issues.

Summary

The development of clean fuel technology will be critically important to the decarbonisation of heavy vehicles. For example, the International Maritime Organisation (IMO) has a GHG emissions reduction strategy to reach net-zero by 2050, including a 20% reduction by 2030 and a 70% reduction by 2040, compared to 2008 levels. To reach these ambitions, the IMO will implement regulatory measures to be adopted in 2025 and enter into force around mid-2027. The achievement of these decarbonisation goals will depend heavily on the use of carbon-neutral fuels. This, in turn, means that new engine technology will be necessary, operating efficiently under known stoichiometric conditions, combined with effective aftertreatment systems to ensure the release of non-toxic, climate-friendly emissions.

Madhumitha explains, “The challenge for the project is to consider the minimisation of all potentially harmful emissions from new fuels, and we will be keeping a close eye on any N2O, NOx and ammonia when developing the new SCR systems. However, the successful achievement of our goals will play an important role in helping the heavy vehicle sector to reduce its GHG emissions, so we are hugely excited about the prospects for this important project.”

SDGs, Targets, and Indicators

1. Which SDGs are addressed or connected to the issues highlighted in the article?

• SDG 7: Affordable and Clean Energy
• SDG 9: Industry, Innovation, and Infrastructure
• SDG 11: Sustainable Cities and Communities
• SDG 13: Climate Action
• SDG 14: Life Below Water
• SDG 15: Life on Land

2. What specific targets under those SDGs can be identified based on the article’s content?

• SDG 7.2: Increase substantially the share of renewable energy in the global energy mix.
• SDG 9.4: Upgrade infrastructure and retrofit industries to make them sustainable, with increased resource-use efficiency and greater adoption of clean and environmentally sound technologies and industrial processes.
• SDG 11.6: Reduce the adverse per capita environmental impact of cities, including by paying special attention to air quality and municipal and other waste management.
• SDG 13.2: Integrate climate change measures into national policies, strategies, and planning.
• SDG 14.1: Prevent and significantly reduce marine pollution of all kinds, in particular from land-based activities, including marine debris and nutrient pollution.
• SDG 15.1: By 2020, ensure the conservation, restoration, and sustainable use of terrestrial and inland freshwater ecosystems and their services, in particular forests, wetlands, mountains, and drylands, in line with obligations under international agreements.

3. Are there any indicators mentioned or implied in the article that can be used to measure progress towards the identified targets?

• Indicator: Share of renewable energy in the global energy mix
• Indicator: Adoption of clean and environmentally sound technologies and industrial processes
• Indicator: Air quality in cities
• Indicator: Integration of climate change measures into national policies and planning
• Indicator: Reduction of marine pollution from land-based activities
• Indicator: Conservation, restoration, and sustainable use of terrestrial and inland freshwater ecosystems

SDGs, Targets, and Indicators

Source: envirotech-online.com