Imagining the restorative justice crime drama
Imagining the restorative justice crime drama Duke Chronicle
sdgtalks
Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) and the Impact of Crime TV Shows
Introduction
Crime TV shows, such as “Criminal Minds,” have become a popular genre in American television. These shows provide a comprehensive narrative structure, thrilling storylines, and concise resolutions to complex conflicts. However, a study conducted by the Color for Change Hollywood project in collaboration with the USC Annenberg Norman Lear Center revealed that these shows often exclude writers of color, miseducate viewers about the criminal justice system, and normalize injustice. This article explores the impact of crime TV shows on society and emphasizes the need for more diverse and socially conscious storytelling.
The Findings
The study analyzed 353 episodes across 26 crime-related scripted television series in the 2017–2018 season. It found that these shows depicted criminal justice professionals engaging in wrongful actions, such as conducting searches without warrants, racially profiling, and using excessive force. These actions were portrayed as normal and necessary for the pursuit of justice. Additionally, women of color were underrepresented as victims of crimes, which does not align with national crime statistics. The study also revealed a lack of diversity among writers and showrunners, with the majority being white. Most shows did not address the systemic issues within the criminal justice system, attributing any ineffectiveness solely to individual police officers.
The Need for Change
While the author acknowledges the enjoyment of crime TV shows, they also recognize the contradiction between their personal beliefs in restorative justice and the glorification of a corrupt justice system in these shows. Restorative justice focuses on accountability, conflict prevention, and repairing harm, which stands in contrast to the punitive approach depicted in crime TV shows. The author argues that media sensationalization of retributive justice is only part of the problem and calls for a shift towards more inclusive and socially conscious storytelling.
Showcasing Restorative Justice
The article highlights the importance of fictionalizing the restorative justice process in scripted stories and new series pitches. By humanizing the phenomenon and showcasing its various methods, restorative justice can become more accessible and realistic to viewers. The author suggests focusing on the people involved in the situation rather than external agencies, highlighting the inequities of the legal system, and presenting nuanced yet optimistic narratives. This approach would not only serve as a tool for exploring and celebrating abolitionist movements but also contribute to compelling drama television.
The Power of Media
The article acknowledges the significant role that media plays in shaping our understanding of crime and punishment. Crime TV shows have the potential to perpetuate harmful ideas about crime, which can contribute to real-life violence. To advocate for a world of nonviolent conflict resolution and trauma-informed justice practices, the author emphasizes the importance of entertainment that reflects these values. By aligning media content with the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), particularly Goal 16: Peace, Justice, and Strong Institutions, society can work towards a more just and equitable future.
Conclusion
The impact of crime TV shows on society cannot be underestimated. While they provide entertainment, they also have the power to shape public perception and perpetuate harmful narratives. By promoting diverse and socially conscious storytelling, media can contribute to the achievement of the SDGs, particularly Goal 16. It is essential to create a media landscape that reflects the values of restorative justice, nonviolent conflict resolution, and accountability.
About the Author
Nik Narain is a Trinity senior. His pieces typically run on alternating Saturdays.
Get The Chronicle straight to your inbox
Signup for our weekly newsletter. Cancel at any time.
SDGs, Targets, and Indicators
1. Which SDGs are addressed or connected to the issues highlighted in the article?
- SDG 5: Gender Equality
- SDG 10: Reduced Inequalities
- SDG 16: Peace, Justice, and Strong Institutions
2. What specific targets under those SDGs can be identified based on the article’s content?
- SDG 5.1: End all forms of discrimination against all women and girls everywhere
- SDG 10.2: By 2030, empower and promote the social, economic, and political inclusion of all, irrespective of age, sex, disability, race, ethnicity, origin, religion, or economic or other status
- SDG 16.3: Promote the rule of law at the national and international levels and ensure equal access to justice for all
3. Are there any indicators mentioned or implied in the article that can be used to measure progress towards the identified targets?
- Representation of women of color as victims of crimes in TV shows
- Percentage of showrunners and writers who are white
- Discussion of problems within the criminal justice system in TV shows
4. Table: SDGs, Targets, and Indicators
| SDGs | Targets | Indicators |
|---|---|---|
| SDG 5: Gender Equality | Target 5.1: End all forms of discrimination against all women and girls everywhere | Representation of women of color as victims of crimes in TV shows |
| SDG 10: Reduced Inequalities | Target 10.2: By 2030, empower and promote the social, economic, and political inclusion of all, irrespective of age, sex, disability, race, ethnicity, origin, religion, or economic or other status | Percentage of showrunners and writers who are white |
| SDG 16: Peace, Justice, and Strong Institutions | Target 16.3: Promote the rule of law at the national and international levels and ensure equal access to justice for all | Discussion of problems within the criminal justice system in TV shows |
Source: dukechronicle.com
