Is It Racist and Misogynist to Demean Kamala Harris?

Is it Racist and Misogynist to Disparage Vice President Kamala Harris?

Introduction

The following article discusses the recent derogatory remarks made by Donald Trump towards Vice President Kamala Harris. It explores whether these comments can be considered racist or misogynistic, given Trump’s history of biased behavior. The article also highlights the double standards applied to Harris compared to Trump and examines the permission structure for biased attacks on her. The Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) are emphasized throughout the article.

Trump’s Disparagement of Kamala Harris

Donald Trump has repeatedly referred to Vice President Kamala Harris using derogatory terms such as “retarded,” “dumb,” and “mentally disabled.” While some may argue that Trump treats all his political foes this way, there is a sharper edge to his insults towards Harris. He has singled her out as being mentally impaired, which is a racist and/or misogynistic act. It is important to note that Trump has a well-documented history of racism and misogyny.

Permission Structure for Bias-Driven Assaults

Trump’s derogatory comments have created a permission structure for biased attacks on Harris. Right-wing media commentators have taken advantage of this, with some articles questioning Harris’ character and personal life. The American Spectator, for example, made crude speculations about her personal life and criticized her for past relationships. The double standards applied to Harris compared to Trump are evident.

Open Season on Harris

There is an open season on Harris for being a woman. Mark Tapson, writing for the Front Page website, claimed that Harris is unlikeable and not a leader, suggesting that male voters do not support her. However, polls show that Harris has significant support among female registered voters. The Federalist also attacked Harris, calling her “too stupid to be president” and questioning her intelligence and articulation. These attacks on Harris are not applied to Trump.

Conclusion

Conservatives have the right to criticize Harris for her policy preferences. However, it is concerning that those who support Trump, despite his numerous flaws, feel compelled to degrade the first Black woman to become the presidential nominee of a major party. This suggests racial bigotry and gender prejudice, which aligns with Trump’s history of biased behavior. It is important to address and challenge these biases to promote equality and inclusivity.

SDGs, Targets, and Indicators

1. Which SDGs are addressed or connected to the issues highlighted in the article?

• SDG 5: Gender Equality
• SDG 10: Reduced Inequalities

2. What specific targets under those SDGs can be identified based on the article’s content?

• SDG 5.1: End all forms of discrimination against all women and girls everywhere
• SDG 5.2: Eliminate all forms of violence against all women and girls in the public and private spheres, including trafficking and sexual and other types of exploitation
• SDG 10.3: Ensure equal opportunity and reduce inequalities of outcome, including by eliminating discriminatory laws, policies, and practices and promoting appropriate legislation, policies, and action in this regard

3. Are there any indicators mentioned or implied in the article that can be used to measure progress towards the identified targets?

Yes, the article implies indicators that can be used to measure progress towards the identified targets. These include:

• Incidents of discriminatory language and insults towards women in positions of power
• Public perception and support for female political leaders
• Gender gaps in voter preferences
• Representation of women in leadership positions

Table: SDGs, Targets, and Indicators

Source: motherjones.com