J.D. Vance’s energy record: Oil cash and EV attacks

Donald Trump’s Running Mate J.D. Vance Supports Oil and Gas Industry

Donald Trump’s decision to choose Sen. J.D. Vance as his running mate likely fortifies the former president’s reputation as the pro-oil choice for voters.

Vance, who Trump named Monday as his pick for vice president, is a strong supporter for drilling and hydraulic fracturing. He has also criticized renewable energy sources like wind, expressed doubts that human activity is causing climate change and painted President Joe Biden as a threat to U.S. energy — even as the country produces record amounts of oil and gas.

Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

1. Goal 7: Affordable and Clean Energy
2. Goal 13: Climate Action
3. Goal 15: Life on Land

Vance’s Support for Oil and Gas Industry

• Vance wrote an op-ed in Ohio’s Marietta Times championing the state’s oil and gas resources and criticizing the Biden administration’s support for alternative energy sources.
• Vance has received significant campaign contributions from the oil and gas industry.
• Vance’s positions align with those of Trump, drawing criticism from environmentalists who believe it would hinder clean energy growth.

Vance’s Record on Energy Policies

• Vance has consistently supported oil and gas interests and opposed clean energy policies.
• He co-sponsored legislation to seek Congressional approval before delaying leasing or permitting for oil, gas, and mining on federal lands.
• Vance introduced a bill to repeal the federal tax credit for electric vehicles and supported tariffs on Chinese solar components.

Vance’s Changing Stance on Climate Change

• Vance initially acknowledged the climate problem in society and praised solar energy as a significant improvement in emissions.
• However, he later expressed doubts about human-driven climate change and criticized the Biden administration’s clean energy policies.

Impact on Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

• Vance’s support for the oil and gas industry may hinder progress towards Goal 7: Affordable and Clean Energy.
• His opposition to clean energy growth could impede efforts to achieve Goal 13: Climate Action.
• Vance’s stance on hydraulic fracturing raises concerns about potential environmental damage, impacting Goal 15: Life on Land.

Conclusion

Vance’s selection as Trump’s running mate reinforces the former president’s pro-oil stance. His support for the oil and gas industry and opposition to clean energy policies align with Trump’s agenda. However, these positions have drawn criticism from environmentalists who believe it would hinder progress towards the SDGs. It remains to be seen how Vance’s energy priorities would impact the country’s sustainable development efforts if Trump wins the election.

SDGs, Targets, and Indicators Analysis

1. Which SDGs are addressed or connected to the issues highlighted in the article?

• SDG 7: Affordable and Clean Energy
• SDG 9: Industry, Innovation, and Infrastructure
• SDG 13: Climate Action

The article discusses the energy policies and positions of J.D. Vance, who is a potential running mate for Donald Trump. The issues highlighted in the article are related to energy production, clean energy, climate change, and environmental policies, which align with the goals of SDG 7 (Affordable and Clean Energy), SDG 9 (Industry, Innovation, and Infrastructure), and SDG 13 (Climate Action).

2. What specific targets under those SDGs can be identified based on the article’s content?

• SDG 7.2: Increase substantially the share of renewable energy in the global energy mix.
• SDG 9.4: Upgrade infrastructure and retrofit industries to make them sustainable.
• SDG 13.2: Integrate climate change measures into national policies, strategies, and planning.

The article mentions the support for drilling and hydraulic fracturing by J.D. Vance, which indicates a focus on non-renewable energy sources. This contrasts with the targets of SDG 7.2, which aims to increase the share of renewable energy in the global energy mix. Additionally, the article discusses Vance’s criticism of renewable energy sources like wind, which goes against the goal of SDG 7.2. The article also highlights Vance’s opposition to clean energy policies implemented by the Biden administration, which is not aligned with SDG 9.4’s target of upgrading infrastructure and industries to make them sustainable. Lastly, Vance’s skepticism about human-driven climate change contradicts the target of SDG 13.2, which calls for the integration of climate change measures into national policies and planning.

3. Are there any indicators mentioned or implied in the article that can be used to measure progress towards the identified targets?

• Percentage of renewable energy in the global energy mix
• Investment in sustainable infrastructure and industries
• Inclusion of climate change measures in national policies and planning

The article does not explicitly mention specific indicators related to the identified targets. However, the article provides information on Vance’s positions and actions regarding energy policies, which can be used to assess progress towards the targets. For example, the percentage of renewable energy in the global energy mix can be measured to determine if there is an increase or decrease in reliance on non-renewable energy sources. Additionally, investment in sustainable infrastructure and industries can be tracked to assess progress towards making them more sustainable. Lastly, the inclusion of climate change measures in national policies and planning can be evaluated by analyzing the policies and actions taken by political candidates like Vance.

SDGs, Targets, and Indicators Table

Source: eenews.net