Kamala Harris has a problem with men. Will misogyny cost her the election? | Simon Tisdall
Kamala Harris has a problem with men. Will misogyny cost her the election? The Guardian
Will Kamala Harris’s Gender Impact the US Election?
The upcoming US election is entering its final two weeks, and there is growing concern among Democrats that Kamala Harris’s gender may have a significant impact on the outcome. Despite Donald Trump’s controversial history, he remains a strong contender, while Harris, though likeable, lacks inspiring policies and is burdened by Joe Biden’s unpopularity. Misogyny and gender bias may play a crucial role in the election.
Gender Bias in the Election
The Emily’s List pressure group has warned about the toxic and misogynistic standards faced by women candidates, particularly women of color. Trump indirectly challenges Harris’s gender by emphasizing the need for “strength” in leadership, which is coded language for masculinity. This election can be seen as a contest between Trump’s “strength” and Harris’s “joy”. Polls show that men tend to support Trump, while women lean towards Harris.
Impact on Voter Categories
Harris’s gender may also influence attitudes in other voter categories. White college-educated voters tend to support Harris, while white non-college-educated voters lean towards Trump. Trump has an advantage among white voters, while Harris leads among non-whites. However, surveys indicate that black and Hispanic voters are less supportive of Harris compared to Biden in 2020, particularly among younger, non-college-educated Hispanic males.
Challenges Faced by Harris
Harris’s support has remained stagnant, and she has struggled to make a strong impact against Trump. Her personal style and approach have been scrutinized, with some critics claiming she lacks clear views and fails to appear “presidential”. However, polls may not accurately reflect her true support, and a high turnout among women, especially on issues like abortion rights, could benefit Harris.
The Importance of a Harris Victory
A victory for Harris is crucial to prevent a second term for Trump, which many believe would be catastrophic. However, there are concerns that gender bias and the electoral college system could undermine Harris’s campaign. It is essential for American women to rise to the challenge and support Harris to overcome these obstacles.
Simon Tisdall is the Observer’s Foreign Affairs Commentator
-
Do you have an opinion on the issues raised in this article? If you would like to submit a letter of up to 250 words to be considered for publication, email it to us at observer.letters@observer.co.uk
SDGs, Targets, and Indicators Analysis
1. Which SDGs are addressed or connected to the issues highlighted in the article?
- SDG 5: Gender Equality
- SDG 10: Reduced Inequalities
The article discusses the potential impact of gender bias and misogyny on the US election, highlighting the challenges faced by Kamala Harris as a woman candidate. This connects to SDG 5, which aims to achieve gender equality and empower all women and girls. It also relates to SDG 10, which focuses on reducing inequalities within and among countries, including gender-based inequalities.
2. What specific targets under those SDGs can be identified based on the article’s content?
- SDG 5.5: Ensure women’s full and effective participation and equal opportunities for leadership at all levels of decision-making.
- SDG 10.3: Ensure equal opportunity and reduce inequalities of outcome, including by eliminating discriminatory laws, policies, and practices.
The article highlights the challenges faced by Kamala Harris as a woman candidate, indicating the need to ensure equal opportunities for women’s participation and leadership in decision-making processes (SDG 5.5). It also emphasizes the existence of gender bias and misogynistic standards that can perpetuate inequalities, calling for the elimination of discriminatory practices (SDG 10.3).
3. Are there any indicators mentioned or implied in the article that can be used to measure progress towards the identified targets?
- Percentage of women in leadership positions in politics and decision-making roles.
- Existence of laws, policies, and practices that promote gender equality and eliminate discrimination.
The article mentions the need for women’s full and effective participation in leadership roles, which can be measured by the percentage of women in such positions. Additionally, the article highlights the importance of eliminating discriminatory laws, policies, and practices, indicating the need to assess the existence and effectiveness of these measures.
Table: SDGs, Targets, and Indicators
SDGs | Targets | Indicators |
---|---|---|
SDG 5: Gender Equality | 5.5: Ensure women’s full and effective participation and equal opportunities for leadership at all levels of decision-making. | Percentage of women in leadership positions in politics and decision-making roles. |
SDG 10: Reduced Inequalities | 10.3: Ensure equal opportunity and reduce inequalities of outcome, including by eliminating discriminatory laws, policies, and practices. | Existence of laws, policies, and practices that promote gender equality and eliminate discrimination. |
Source: theguardian.com