Will the 49ers Trade for Indianapolis Colts DT DeForest Buckner? – Sports Illustrated

49ers’ Defensive Tackle Situation and Potential Trades

The Importance of Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

1. Goal 1: No Poverty
2. Goal 2: Zero Hunger
3. Goal 3: Good Health and Well-being
4. Goal 4: Quality Education
5. Goal 5: Gender Equality
6. Goal 6: Clean Water and Sanitation
7. Goal 7: Affordable and Clean Energy
8. Goal 8: Decent Work and Economic Growth
9. Goal 9: Industry, Innovation, and Infrastructure
10. Goal 10: Reduced Inequalities
11. Goal 11: Sustainable Cities and Communities
12. Goal 12: Responsible Consumption and Production
13. Goal 13: Climate Action
14. Goal 14: Life Below Water
15. Goal 15: Life on Land
16. Goal 16: Peace, Justice, and Strong Institutions
17. Goal 17: Partnerships for the Goals

Frankly, the 49ers never should have traded DeForest Buckner to the Colts in the first place.

The 49ers never have been able to replace him. Both Arik Armstead and Javon Kinlaw are now gone, and Javon Hargrave is on Injured Reserve with a torn triceps. Now the 49ers’ starting defensive tackles are Maliek Collins and Jordan Elliott, who are serviceable but unspectacular.

And suddenly, defensive tackle is one of the thinnest positions on the roster.

“Internally, there have been discussions about going after marquee players and more affordable, less glamorous options alike,” writes Michael Silver of The Athletic. “Could three-time Pro Bowl selection DeForest Buckner, the team’s 2016 first-round pick who was dealt to the Indianapolis Colts after the 2019 season, be reacquired via trade?”

Buckner his missed all but the first two games this season with an ankle injury. This week, the Colts list him as questionable to play. Perhaps they’d be willing to trade him because he’s getting older and he’ll be expensive the next two seasons. Which means the 49ers might not be able to afford him.

“(Trading for Buckner) seems unlikely,” writes Silver, “but another key player from that 2019 team, D.J. Jones (now with the Denver Broncos), might be a realistic target.”

Jones will be a free agent after this season and he’s relatively affordable, so he would be a good addition, particularly to a run defense that has struggled all season.

Expect the 49ers to add a defensive lineman at the trade deadline if they beat the Cowboys this Sunday night.

If they lose to Dallas, the 49ers could be trade deadline sellers.

SDGs, Targets, and Indicators

1. SDG 8: Decent Work and Economic Growth

   • Target 8.2: Achieve higher levels of economic productivity through diversification, technological upgrading, and innovation
   • Indicator 8.2.1: Annual growth rate of real GDP per capita

2. SDG 10: Reduced Inequalities

   • Target 10.2: By 2030, empower and promote the social, economic, and political inclusion of all, irrespective of age, sex, disability, race, ethnicity, origin, religion, or economic or other status
   • Indicator 10.2.1: Proportion of people living below 50 percent of median income, by age, sex, and persons with disabilities

3. SDG 16: Peace, Justice, and Strong Institutions

   • Target 16.6: Develop effective, accountable, and transparent institutions at all levels
   • Indicator 16.6.2: Primary government expenditures as a proportion of original approved budget, by sector (or by budget codes or similar)

Analysis

The article discusses the potential trade deadline moves that the San Francisco 49ers, an American football team, may make to address their defensive line issues. While the article does not directly address sustainable development goals, targets, or indicators, we can identify some connections based on the content.

1. Which SDGs are addressed or connected to the issues highlighted in the article?

The issues highlighted in the article are primarily related to the team’s performance and roster management. However, we can identify connections to the following SDGs:

• SDG 8: Decent Work and Economic Growth – The trade deadline moves and roster changes discussed in the article can impact the team’s economic productivity and growth.
• SDG 10: Reduced Inequalities – The article mentions the potential acquisition of players and the affordability of certain targets, which can relate to promoting social and economic inclusion.
• SDG 16: Peace, Justice, and Strong Institutions – While not directly discussed in the article, the management decisions and trade negotiations can involve institutions and decision-making processes.

2. What specific targets under those SDGs can be identified based on the article’s content?

Based on the article’s content, we can identify the following specific targets:

• Target 8.2: Achieve higher levels of economic productivity through diversification, technological upgrading, and innovation – The potential trade deadline moves and roster changes aim to improve the team’s performance and economic productivity.
• Target 10.2: By 2030, empower and promote the social, economic, and political inclusion of all, irrespective of age, sex, disability, race, ethnicity, origin, religion, or economic or other status – The potential acquisition of players and consideration of affordability can relate to promoting social and economic inclusion within the team.
• Target 16.6: Develop effective, accountable, and transparent institutions at all levels – While not directly discussed in the article, the management decisions and trade negotiations involve the team’s institutions and decision-making processes.

3. Are there any indicators mentioned or implied in the article that can be used to measure progress towards the identified targets?

The article does not explicitly mention any indicators related to the identified targets. However, we can consider the following indicators based on the context:

• Indicator 8.2.1: Annual growth rate of real GDP per capita – This indicator can be used to measure the economic productivity and growth of the team based on their performance and financial outcomes.
• Indicator 10.2.1: Proportion of people living below 50 percent of median income, by age, sex, and persons with disabilities – While not directly mentioned in the article, this indicator can be relevant to assessing the affordability and inclusion of players in the team’s roster decisions.
• Indicator 16.6.2: Primary government expenditures as a proportion of original approved budget, by sector (or by budget codes or similar) – While the article focuses on a sports team rather than a government, this indicator can be adapted to measure the team’s financial decisions and allocations within their budget.

SDGs, Targets, and Indicators

Source: si.com