Addressing climate change impacts

Addressing climate change impacts  MIT Technology Review

Addressing climate change impacts

Addressing climate change impacts

The Reality of Climate Change and its Impact on US Businesses

In partnership with Michigan Economic Development Corporation

In partnership withMichigan Economic Development Corporation


The reality of climate change has spurred enormous public and private investment worldwide, funding initiatives to mitigate its effects and to adapt to its impacts. That investment has spawned entire industries and countless new businesses, resulting in the creation of new green jobs and contributions to economic growth. In the United States, this includes the single largest climate-related investment in the country’s history, made in 2022 as part of the Inflation Reduction Act.

For most US businesses, however, the costs imposed by climate change and the future risks it poses will outweigh growth opportunities afforded by the green sector. In a survey of 300 senior US executives conducted by MIT Technology Review, every respondent agrees that climate change is either harming the economy today or will do so in the future. Most expect their organizations to contend with extreme weather, such as severe storms, flooding, and extreme heat, in the near term. Respondents also report their businesses are already incurring costs related to climate change.

This research examines how US businesses view their climate change risk and the steps they are taking to adapt to climate change’s impacts. The results make clear that climate considerations, such as frequency of extreme weather and access to natural resources, are now a prime factor in businesses’ site location decisions. As climate change accelerates, such considerations are certain to grow in importance.

Key findings include the following:

  1. Businesses are weighing relocation due to climate risks. Most executives in the survey (62%) deem their physical infrastructure (some or all of it) exposed to the impacts of climate change, with 20% reporting it is “very exposed.” A full 75% of respondents report their organization has considered relocating due to climate risk, with 6% indicating they have concrete plans to relocate facilities within the next five years due to climate factors. And 24% report they have already relocated physical infrastructure to prepare for climate change impacts.
  2. Companies must lock in the costs of climate change adaptation. Nearly all US businesses have already suffered from the effects of climate change, judging by the survey. Weighing most heavily thus far, and likely in the future, are increases in operational costs (affecting 64%) and insurance premiums (63%), as well as disruption to operations (61%) and damage to infrastructure (55%).
  3. Executives know climate change is here, and many are planning for it. Four-fifths (81%) of survey respondents deem climate planning and preparedness important to their business, and one-third describe it as very important. There is a seeming lag at some companies, however, at translating this perceived importance into actual planning: only 62% have developed a climate change adaptation plan, and 52% have conducted a climate risk assessment.
  4. Climate-planning resources are a key criterion in site location. When judging a potential new business site on its climate mitigation features, 71% of executives highlight the availability of climate-planning resources as among their top criteria. Nearly two-thirds (64%) also cite the importance of a location’s access to critical natural resources.
  5. Though climate change will affect everyone, its risks and impacts vary by region. No US region is immune to climate change: a majority of surveyed businesses in every region have experienced at least some negative climate change impacts. However, respondents believe the risks are lowest in the Midwest, with nearly half of respondents (47%) naming that region as least exposed to climate change risk.

Download the full report.

This content was produced by Insights, the custom content arm of MIT Technology Review. It was not written by MIT Technology Review’s editorial staff.

SDGs, Targets, and Indicators

1. Which SDGs are addressed or connected to the issues highlighted in the article?

  • SDG 8: Decent Work and Economic Growth
  • SDG 9: Industry, Innovation, and Infrastructure
  • SDG 11: Sustainable Cities and Communities
  • SDG 13: Climate Action

2. What specific targets under those SDGs can be identified based on the article’s content?

  • SDG 8.4: Improve progressively, through 2030, global resource efficiency in consumption and production and endeavor to decouple economic growth from environmental degradation.
  • SDG 9.4: By 2030, upgrade infrastructure and retrofit industries to make them sustainable, with increased resource-use efficiency and greater adoption of clean and environmentally sound technologies and industrial processes.
  • SDG 11.5: By 2030, significantly reduce the number of deaths and the number of people affected and substantially decrease the direct economic losses relative to global gross domestic product caused by disasters, including water-related disasters, with a focus on protecting the poor and people in vulnerable situations.
  • SDG 13.1: Strengthen resilience and adaptive capacity to climate-related hazards and natural disasters in all countries.

3. Are there any indicators mentioned or implied in the article that can be used to measure progress towards the identified targets?

  • Percentage of businesses that have considered relocating due to climate risk
  • Percentage of businesses that have already relocated physical infrastructure to prepare for climate change impacts
  • Percentage of businesses that have developed a climate change adaptation plan
  • Percentage of businesses that have conducted a climate risk assessment
  • Percentage of executives who consider climate-planning resources as a top criterion in site location
  • Percentage of executives who consider a location’s access to critical natural resources as important
  • Percentage of businesses that have experienced negative climate change impacts

SDGs, Targets, and Indicators

SDGs Targets Indicators
SDG 8: Decent Work and Economic Growth SDG 8.4: Improve progressively, through 2030, global resource efficiency in consumption and production and endeavor to decouple economic growth from environmental degradation. – Percentage of businesses that have considered relocating due to climate risk
– Percentage of businesses that have already relocated physical infrastructure to prepare for climate change impacts
SDG 9: Industry, Innovation, and Infrastructure SDG 9.4: By 2030, upgrade infrastructure and retrofit industries to make them sustainable, with increased resource-use efficiency and greater adoption of clean and environmentally sound technologies and industrial processes. – Percentage of businesses that have developed a climate change adaptation plan
– Percentage of businesses that have conducted a climate risk assessment
SDG 11: Sustainable Cities and Communities SDG 11.5: By 2030, significantly reduce the number of deaths and the number of people affected and substantially decrease the direct economic losses relative to global gross domestic product caused by disasters, including water-related disasters, with a focus on protecting the poor and people in vulnerable situations. – Percentage of businesses that have experienced negative climate change impacts
SDG 13: Climate Action SDG 13.1: Strengthen resilience and adaptive capacity to climate-related hazards and natural disasters in all countries. – Percentage of businesses that have considered relocating due to climate risk
– Percentage of businesses that have already relocated physical infrastructure to prepare for climate change impacts
– Percentage of businesses that have developed a climate change adaptation plan
– Percentage of businesses that have conducted a climate risk assessment
– Percentage of executives who consider climate-planning resources as a top criterion in site location
– Percentage of executives who consider a location’s access to critical natural resources as important
– Percentage of businesses that have experienced negative climate change impacts

Source: technologyreview.com