Advancing Sustainable Land Management and Resilience Across the Great Plains

Texas A&M AgriLife leads collaborative $1.5 million grant

October 1, 2023

Texas A&M AgriLife researchers are leading a multi-state grant with the goal of improving rangeland health and productivity through science-based management practices.

COLLEGE STATION, Texas — Texas A&M AgriLife researchers are looking at a one-two punch to restore rangeland health and support sustainable livestock production today.

Historically, human-made and naturally occurring fires shaped the prairie landscapes and the movement and habits of grazing animals such as bison and pronghorn across the Great Plains. In turn, the successional patchwork of prairie vegetation promoted diverse habitat for birds and wildlife and provided nutrient-dense forage for grazing animals.

“Historically, much of the Great Plains rangelands were far more open with pockets of wooded areas,” said Ben Wu, Ph.D., professor in the Texas A&M College of Agriculture and Life Sciences Department of Ecology and Conservation Biology. “But there has been a huge change in the landscape due to woody plant encroachment associated with changing land management practices and weather patterns.”

Wu said these changes have resulted in a loss of ecosystem services including biodiversity and quality forage for livestock production.

“If you don’t have grasses, you don’t have a forage — that’s a big deal for ranchers,” Wu said. “Mechanical and chemical control have been used in an attempt to control woody encroachment, but these methods are expensive and not sustainable.”

Now, thanks to a $1.5 million grant from the U.S. Department of Agriculture National Institute of Food and Agriculture, Wu and colleagues in the Department of Rangeland, Wildlife and Fisheries Management will implement a five-year collaborative effort with USDA Climate Hubs and others to promote the use of more sustainable, cost-effective agricultural practices to restore rangeland health and benefit livestock production across the Great Plains.

Collectively, these and other land management exercises that benefit ecosystem health, mitigate impacts of climatic change and improve overall operational resiliency are referred to by the USDA as “climate-smart” practices.

An integrated approach

The new grant will build upon the framework of the USDA-funded Prairie Project, a collaboration of research, teaching and extension faculty from Texas A&M University, Oklahoma State University and the University of Nebraska.

“We have had such great experiences working with educators, extension and natural resource professionals with the Prairie Project that it was a natural fit to take on this new project together while also incorporating new partners,” said Morgan Treadwell, Ph.D., Texas A&M AgriLife Extension Service range specialist and associate professor in the Department of Rangeland, Wildlife and Fisheries Management, San Angelo.

Over the past five years, members of the Prairie Project partnered with ranchers, academics, extension faculty and students across the Great Plains to conduct research, share knowledge and address threats affecting ecosystem health and livestock production.

Through this process, research has shown that when used together, two specific management practices deliver a one-two punch in the battle to maintain rangeland health – prescribed burns and mixed-animal grazing, also known as pyric herbivory.

“Emerging research has shown that agricultural practices such as pyric herbivory and mixed-species grazing are effective at reducing the risks and impacts of drought, wildfire and woody plant encroachment,” Wu said.

While livestock like goats browse and help suppress woody vegetation, cattle benefit from the nutrient-dense forage that resprouts after a burn.

“Through fire, we’re able to make woody plants more palatable to browsing animals such as goats,” Treadwell said. “This is due in large part to how fire affects the levels of tannins and phytochemicals present in the plants.”

Agents of change through education and outreach

Despite promising research findings, public understanding and implementation of these climate-smart practices has been limited.

To remedy this, the collaborative grant team will build an integrated Extension and education program promoting public understanding and adoption of pyric herbivory and multi-species grazing across Texas, Oklahoma and Nebraska.

The programming will empower “agents of change” comprised of two cohorts of secondary and undergraduate educators, Extension agents and other natural resource professionals from governmental and non-governmental agencies engaged in stakeholder and public outreach.

Through intensive summer workshops, monthly cohort meetings and individual consultations, researchers will mentor and support participants as they learn the science behind these practices and visit ranches implementing them.

Further, participants will design high-impact education and outreach modules focused on these methods for use in their respective classrooms or outreach programming.

“We’re really aiming for a diverse background of cohort members so everyone can learn together and develop a respect for what each profession brings to the table in advancing natural resource management,” Treadwell said.

Training the next generation of natural resource leaders

This fall, each participating university will also support two Climate Hub Fellows pursuing a master’s degree in natural resources.

“Their coursework will focus on technical skills and expertise in climate-smart agriculture practices as well as professional development related to inclusive leadership, communication and project management,” said Melissa Shehane, Ph.D., instructional assistant professor and internship coordinator with the Department of Rangeland, Wildlife and Fisheries Management.

In addition to tailored coursework, each fellow will complete two internships — one with a USDA Climate Hub and another at a targeted agency supporting the USDA Pathways Program.

“We’ll be training premier students to transition into USDA agencies such as the Natural Resources Conservation Service and really find their footing so they can begin growing as leaders in advancing climate-smart agriculture practices,” Shehane said.

For more information on participating in the project’s educator or natural resource professional cohort, contact Shehane at melissa.shehane@ag.tamu.edu.

-Sarah Fuller
Texas A&M AgriLife Communications

SDGs, Targets, and Indicators

1. Which SDGs are addressed or connected to the issues highlighted in the article?

• SDG 15: Life on Land

The article discusses the goal of improving rangeland health and productivity through science-based management practices, which directly relates to SDG 15, which focuses on protecting, restoring, and promoting sustainable use of terrestrial ecosystems.

2. What specific targets under those SDGs can be identified based on the article’s content?

• Target 15.1: By 2020, ensure the conservation, restoration, and sustainable use of terrestrial and inland freshwater ecosystems and their services.
• Target 15.2: By 2020, promote the implementation of sustainable management of all types of forests, halt deforestation, restore degraded forests, and substantially increase afforestation and reforestation globally.

The article highlights the need to restore rangeland health and support sustainable livestock production through more sustainable agricultural practices. This aligns with the targets of ensuring the conservation, restoration, and sustainable use of terrestrial ecosystems (Target 15.1) and promoting sustainable forest management (Target 15.2).

3. Are there any indicators mentioned or implied in the article that can be used to measure progress towards the identified targets?

• Indicator 15.1.1: Forest area as a proportion of total land area
• Indicator 15.2.1: Progress towards sustainable forest management

While the article does not explicitly mention these indicators, the focus on restoring rangeland health and implementing sustainable agricultural practices implies the need to measure forest area as a proportion of total land area (Indicator 15.1.1) and progress towards sustainable forest management (Indicator 15.2.1).

Table: SDGs, Targets, and Indicators

Behold! This splendid article springs forth from the wellspring of knowledge, shaped by a wondrous proprietary AI technology that delved into a vast ocean of data, illuminating the path towards the Sustainable Development Goals. Remember that all rights are reserved by SDG Investors LLC, empowering us to champion progress together.

Source: morningagclips.com

Join us, as fellow seekers of change, on a transformative journey at https://sdgtalks.ai/welcome, where you can become a member and actively contribute to shaping a brighter future.