Sex acts to online rants, how media coverage of Trump’s criminal trial misses the point

This is not normal

The big story on cable TV news and everywhere else Tuesday was the testimony adult film star Stormy Daniels gave in former President Donald Trump’s hush money trial.

“A rather not-safe-for-work day in court,” as CNN’s Jake Tapper put it.

Daniels went into great detail about the alleged affair at the heart of the case, including a tale of spanking Trump and … hang on a second.

We need to put this into perspective. Trump and his minions, in their relentless attacks on the truth and the legitimate media’s attempt to report it, have for far too long succeeded at normalizing the abnormal, and too often journalists have gone along with it. This is a guy who has attacked and denigrated the country’s norms and institutions, all while demanding the protections they offer.

This is not normal

This is not normal. This is not normal at all. It’s weird. It’s downright bizarre, like something out of an alternate universe. And journalists need to start acting like it is.

Just as importantly, so do their audiences.

This is not normal

Vaughn Hillyard, an Arizona State University graduate and excellent NBC and MSNBC reporter, got things right Tuesday morning. He was asked a general question about what was going on at the trial, but he took a beat before answering the question.

“Let’s take a step back for a moment here,” Hillyard said. “Six months out from the 2024 presidential election you have the presumptive Republican nominee inside of a courtroom listening to the testimony of an adult film star in which she is alleging that Donald Trump … engaged in an extra-marital affair just four months after his son, Barron, was born. This is hitting at the heart of the creditably of not Stormy Daniels, but of the defendant, Donald Trump.”

This is not normal

The day began with Trump, already fined by Judge Juan Merchan 10 times for contempt of court for his public and social-media outbursts, taking to his Truth Social platform to complain that the defense hadn’t had time to prepare for Daniels and that the judge is “CROOKED & HIGHLY CONFLICTED.”

Trump has been found in contempt of court 10 times. How does that even happen? Has there ever been anyone since, I don’t know, a Roman emperor or somebody, who so blatantly demonstrates that they don’t believe the rules apply to them?

Whatever the case, apparently not wishing to make it 11 times, Trump quickly deleted the Tuesday morning post.

This isn’t business as usual. And we can’t start thinking it is

“The fact that Trump deleted the post suggests there were some heated conversations behind the scenes with his lawyers,” Jonathan Storm of the New York Times wrote in a running blog. “Trump hates deleting posts — he sees it as a sign of weakness — and has often resisted taking down even the most incendiary posts.”

See? Weird.

This isn’t business as usual. And we can’t start thinking it is

And how weird did it get? Again, it was weird before it even started. Jonah Bromwich, also writing in the New York Times blog, posted that, “Susan Hoffinger, a prosecutor, clarifies that Stormy Daniels will not describe ‘genitalia.’ This was — amazingly, given the defendant is a former president — an open question.”

No kidding.

The day in court was reportedly intense, with Daniels going into graphic detail — more than Merchan wanted to hear. Or, as Tapper put it, “TMI.” Again, “TMI” isn’t something typically associated with coverage of a former president, but this is anything but typical.

This isn’t business as usual. And we can’t start thinking it is

CNN and MSNBC reported on the day’s events, while Fox News, nothing if not reliable, framed it as positively as possible for Trump, given the circumstances. Jonathan Turley, always eager to defend the former president, complained about the judge allowing Daniels such a broad scope in her testimony, which inevitably led to all the sordid details.

“They lit a dumpster fire in this courtroom,” he said. Just like clockwork.

If you’re not yet convinced at the weird nature of what’s going on in the country, there’s this: After testimony wrapped up for the day, the networks settled into analysis and whatnot. Until news broke that the judge in the case in which Trump is accused of several felonies related to the possession of classified documents, had delayed that trial indefinitely.

Just another day at the office.

And that’s the problem.

Journalists need to consistently treat this as the circus that it is. We can’t grow immune to it. You can get used to anything. That doesn’t mean you should.

SDGs, Targets, and Indicators

1. Which SDGs are addressed or connected to the issues highlighted in the article?

• SDG 16: Peace, Justice, and Strong Institutions
• SDG 5: Gender Equality
• SDG 10: Reduced Inequalities

Explanation:

The article discusses the testimony of Stormy Daniels in former President Donald Trump’s hush money trial. The issues highlighted in the article are related to justice, gender equality, and inequalities. These align with the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) of Peace, Justice, and Strong Institutions (SDG 16), Gender Equality (SDG 5), and Reduced Inequalities (SDG 10).

2. What specific targets under those SDGs can be identified based on the article’s content?

• Target 16.6: Develop effective, accountable, and transparent institutions at all levels (SDG 16)
• Target 5.1: End all forms of discrimination against all women and girls everywhere (SDG 5)
• Target 10.2: Empower and promote the social, economic, and political inclusion of all, irrespective of age, sex, disability, race, ethnicity, origin, religion, or economic or other status (SDG 10)

Explanation:

Based on the issues discussed in the article, the specific targets that can be identified are related to developing effective and transparent institutions (Target 16.6), ending discrimination against women and girls (Target 5.1), and promoting social, economic, and political inclusion for all individuals (Target 10.2).

3. Are there any indicators mentioned or implied in the article that can be used to measure progress towards the identified targets?

No specific indicators are mentioned or implied in the article that can be used to measure progress towards the identified targets.

Explanation:

The article does not provide any specific indicators that can be used to measure progress towards the identified targets. It primarily focuses on highlighting the abnormality and weirdness of the situation rather than providing measurable indicators.

4. SDGs, Targets, and Indicators

Copyright: Dive into this article, curated with care by SDG Investors Inc. Our advanced AI technology searches through vast amounts of data to spotlight how we are all moving forward with the Sustainable Development Goals. While we own the rights to this content, we invite you to share it to help spread knowledge and spark action on the SDGs.

Fuente: azcentral.com

Join us, as fellow seekers of change, on a transformative journey at https://sdgtalks.ai/welcome, where you can become a member and actively contribute to shaping a brighter future.