Study Finds “Synergistic Effect” Between Ozone and Fine Particulate Matter Air Pollution Heart Risks – AboutLawsuits.com
Study Finds "Synergistic Effect" Between Ozone and Fine Particulate ... AboutLawsuits.com
sdgtalks
The Combined Effects of Air Pollutants Increase the Risk of Death from Heart Disease
A new study has found that the combined effects of two common air pollutants, ozone and fine particulate matter 2.5 (PM 2.5), increase the risk of death from heart disease. The findings highlight the importance of addressing air pollution in order to achieve the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs).
Synergistic Effect of Ozone and PM 2.5
Ozone and PM 2.5 have a synergistic effect, meaning that they work together to enhance the negative effects on human health. This synergistic effect is particularly pronounced in cooler weather and climates.
The study, published in The BMJ on August 14, analyzed data on mortality from 1994 to 2020 across 372 cities in 19 countries and regions. The researchers found that 5.3 million deaths were linked to heart disease, and 1.9 million deaths were linked to respiratory illnesses. However, when high levels of ozone and PM 2.5 were present simultaneously, the rates of death increased.
This synergistic effect between PM 2.5 and ozone was most prominent in high-latitude regions such as the northern parts of the U.S. and Canada. It was also more significant during cold seasons.
The researchers concluded, “Regional and seasonal characteristics may modify the interaction between PM2.5 and O3 associated with different mortality outcomes, with more pronounced interactions in high latitude regions and during cold seasons. Our findings indicate a larger disease burden associated with exposure to PM2.5 and O3 than the sum of their individual contributions, which provide important evidence for future coordinated control of these air pollutants.”
Addressing Air Pollution for Sustainable Development
Air pollution, particularly from particulate matter and ozone, poses significant risks to human health. These findings underscore the need to prioritize air quality improvement as part of efforts to achieve the SDGs.
Prior studies have shown that more than one-third of the U.S. population, or about 120 million Americans, live in areas with unhealthy levels of air pollution. This highlights the urgent need for coordinated actions to reduce air pollution and protect public health.
SDGs, Targets, and Indicators
| SDGs | Targets | Indicators |
|---|---|---|
| SDG 3: Good Health and Well-being | Target 3.9: By 2030, substantially reduce the number of deaths and illnesses from hazardous chemicals and air, water, and soil pollution and contamination | Indicator: Number of deaths attributed to air pollution |
| SDG 11: Sustainable Cities and Communities | Target 11.6: By 2030, reduce the adverse per capita environmental impact of cities, including by paying special attention to air quality and municipal and other waste management | Indicator: Air quality index in cities |
1. Which SDGs are addressed or connected to the issues highlighted in the article?
SDG 3: Good Health and Well-being
The article addresses the issue of air pollution and its impact on human health, specifically heart disease and respiratory conditions. SDG 3 aims to ensure healthy lives and promote well-being for all at all ages.
SDG 11: Sustainable Cities and Communities
The article also highlights the impact of air pollution on cities and communities. SDG 11 focuses on making cities inclusive, safe, resilient, and sustainable.
2. What specific targets under those SDGs can be identified based on the article’s content?
Target 3.9: By 2030, substantially reduce the number of deaths and illnesses from hazardous chemicals and air, water, and soil pollution and contamination
The article emphasizes the increased risk of death from heart-related and respiratory conditions due to the combined effects of ozone and fine particulate matter (PM 2.5) air pollutants. Target 3.9 aims to reduce deaths and illnesses caused by air pollution.
Target 11.6: By 2030, reduce the adverse per capita environmental impact of cities, including by paying special attention to air quality and municipal and other waste management
The article mentions that more than one-third of the U.S. population lives in areas with unhealthy levels of air pollution. Target 11.6 focuses on reducing the adverse environmental impact of cities, including improving air quality.
3. Are there any indicators mentioned or implied in the article that can be used to measure progress towards the identified targets?
Indicator: Number of deaths attributed to air pollution
The article states that 5.3 million deaths were linked to heart disease and 1.9 million deaths were linked to respiratory illnesses. These deaths can be considered indicators of the impact of air pollution on human health.
Indicator: Air quality index in cities
Although not explicitly mentioned in the article, the article highlights the issue of unhealthy levels of air pollution in certain regions. Monitoring the air quality index in cities can serve as an indicator of progress towards improving air quality.
Behold! This splendid article springs forth from the wellspring of knowledge, shaped by a wondrous proprietary AI technology that delved into a vast ocean of data, illuminating the path towards the Sustainable Development Goals. Remember that all rights are reserved by SDG Investors LLC, empowering us to champion progress together.
Source: aboutlawsuits.com
Join us, as fellow seekers of change, on a transformative journey at https://sdgtalks.ai/welcome, where you can become a member and actively contribute to shaping a brighter future.
