Swinney Ties Howard’s Wins Record as Clemson Outlasts Wake Forest, 17-12

Clemson’s Defense Leads to Victory over Wake Forest

BOX SCORE (PDF) | PHOTO GALLERY | GAME NOTES | HIGHLIGHTS

CLEMSON, S.C. – Clemson’s Defense Sets the Tone

Clemson’s defense set the tone and the running game picked up 207 yards to lead the Tigers (4-2, 2-2 ACC) to a 17-12 win over Wake Forest (3-2, 0-2) at Memorial Stadium on Homecoming. With the win, Head Coach Dabo Swinney earned his 165th career victory to tie College Football Hall of Famer Frank Howard (165 from 1940-69) as the winningest head coach in Clemson history.

Key Highlights

• Will Shipley’s touchdown run late in the fourth quarter gave the Tigers some breathing room.
• The Tigers recovered an onside kick with 1:34 to play after a Wake Forest touchdown.
• Phil Mafah ran for 33 yards on the game’s final drive to help Clemson run out the clock.

Strong Defensive Performance

Clemson’s defense produced eight tackles for loss, four sacks, a fumble recovery, and allowed only 2.6 yards per rush on 39 carries. The Tigers also limited Wake Forest to only two third-down conversions on 12 attempts. R.J. Mickens led the defensive unit with nine total tackles, five of which were solo.

Offensive Contributions

Cade Klubnik completed 18-of-28 passes for 131 yards and added 48 rushing yards, including a seven-yard touchdown scamper in the first quarter. Will Shipley led Clemson in rushing yards with 97, including his one-yard touchdown with 5:49 to play.

Game Recap

Early in the game, a fumble gave Wake Forest the ball on Clemson’s nine-yard line, but Clemson forced a turnover on downs to hold the Demon Deacons scoreless. Wake Forest later opened the scoring with a 35-yard field goal in the first quarter.

In the second quarter, Clemson’s Klubnik scored a seven-yard rushing touchdown to put the Tigers ahead 7-3. A missed field goal by Wake Forest as time expired kept the score at 7-3 at halftime.

In the second half, Shipley’s 21-yard run set up a field goal by Jonathan Weitz to increase Clemson’s lead to 10-3. Wake Forest responded with a field goal of their own to make it 10-6.

Shipley later scored a one-yard touchdown to extend Clemson’s lead to 17-6. Wake Forest managed to score a touchdown, but Clemson stopped their two-point conversion attempt, making the score 17-12 with 1:34 left to play.

Next Steps

Clemson has a midseason open date next week before returning to action on Saturday, Oct. 21, at Miami (Fla.). The team’s next home game will be on Saturday, Nov. 4, against the Notre Dame Fighting Irish. Tickets and gameday experiences for Clemson’s remaining three home games at Memorial Stadium remain available here.

SDGs, Targets, and Indicators Analysis

1. Which SDGs are addressed or connected to the issues highlighted in the article?

• SDG 3: Good Health and Well-being
• SDG 4: Quality Education
• SDG 8: Decent Work and Economic Growth
• SDG 10: Reduced Inequalities
• SDG 16: Peace, Justice, and Strong Institutions

The article discusses Clemson’s football game victory and mentions various aspects related to health and well-being (SDG 3) of the players, the educational institution (SDG 4), the economic growth and employment opportunities associated with the game (SDG 8), the potential inequalities between the teams (SDG 10), and the role of the coach as a leader and institution builder (SDG 16).

2. What specific targets under those SDGs can be identified based on the article’s content?

• Target 3.4: By 2030, reduce by one-third premature mortality from non-communicable diseases through prevention and treatment and promote mental health and well-being.
• Target 4.7: By 2030, ensure that all learners acquire the knowledge and skills needed to promote sustainable development, including among others through education for sustainable development and sustainable lifestyles.
• Target 8.5: By 2030, achieve full and productive employment and decent work for all women and men, including for young people and persons with disabilities, and equal pay for work of equal value.
• Target 10.2: By 2030, empower and promote the social, economic, and political inclusion of all, irrespective of age, sex, disability, race, ethnicity, origin, religion, or economic or other status.
• Target 16.7: Ensure responsive, inclusive, participatory, and representative decision-making at all levels.

The article indirectly addresses these targets through the discussion of the team’s performance, the physical and mental well-being of the players, the educational opportunities provided by the institution, the employment opportunities for players and coaches, and the importance of inclusive decision-making in the team.

3. Are there any indicators mentioned or implied in the article that can be used to measure progress towards the identified targets?

• Indicator 3.4.1: Mortality rate attributed to cardiovascular disease, cancer, diabetes, or chronic respiratory disease.
• Indicator 4.7.1: Extent to which (i) global citizenship education and (ii) education for sustainable development are mainstreamed in (a) national education policies; (b) curricula; (c) teacher education; and (d) student assessment.
• Indicator 8.5.1: Average hourly earnings of female and male employees, by occupation, age group, and persons with disabilities.
• Indicator 10.2.1: Proportion of people living below 50 percent of median income, by age, sex, and persons with disabilities.
• Indicator 16.7.1: Proportions of positions (by sex, age group, persons with disabilities, and population groups) in public institutions (national and local legislatures, public service, and judiciary) compared to national distributions.

The article does not explicitly mention these indicators, but they can be used to measure progress towards the identified targets. For example, the mortality rate of players due to non-communicable diseases can be monitored (Indicator 3.4.1), the integration of sustainable development education in the institution’s policies and curricula can be assessed (Indicator 4.7.1), and the gender pay gap in the coaching staff can be examined (Indicator 8.5.1).

SDGs, Targets, and Indicators Table

Behold! This splendid article springs forth from the wellspring of knowledge, shaped by a wondrous proprietary AI technology that delved into a vast ocean of data, illuminating the path towards the Sustainable Development Goals. Remember that all rights are reserved by SDG Investors LLC, empowering us to champion progress together.

Source: clemsontigers.com

Join us, as fellow seekers of change, on a transformative journey at https://sdgtalks.ai/welcome, where you can become a member and actively contribute to shaping a brighter future.