Abrupt loss and uncertain recovery from fires of #Amazon forests under low #climate mitigation scenarios — NOAA

Key Findings

• GFDL-ESM4.1, a fully coupled global climate and carbon cycle model which can account for the simultaneous effect of fires, water stress, and plant competition, was used to analyze recent trends and future projections of tropical forest biomass and fire carbon emissions.
• The results showed a possibility of abrupt response of Amazonian carbon stocks to unmitigated future climate change.
• Up to 40% of Amazon forests may begin to convert to savanna before mid-century under high greenhouse gas emission scenarios.
• Results reveal the importance of complex nonlinear responses to projected warming and drying over the Amazon and the urgent need to research postfire recovery and its representation in Earth System Models.

Authors:

1. Isabel Martínez Cano, Elena Shevliakova, Sergey Malyshev, Jasmin G. John, Yan Yu, Benjamin Smith, and Stephen W. Pacala. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2203200119

Tropical forests buffer climate change impacts by acting as a major sink for anthropogenic carbon emissions, which is essential to slowing down the buildup of atmospheric CO₂. However, the response of tropical forests to more frequent weather extremes and long-recovery disturbances like fires remains uncertain. Analyses of field data and ecological theory raise concerns about the possibility of the Amazon crossing a tipping point, leading to catastrophic tropical forest loss. In contrast, climate models consistently project an enhanced tropical sink.

The authors bring these two bodies of work together by analyzing recent trends and future projections of tropical forest biomass and fire carbon emissions using GFDL-ESM4.1, a fully coupled global climate and carbon cycle model. Experiments with this model accounted for the simultaneous effect of fires, water stress, and plant competition.

The results showed a heterogeneous response of Amazonian carbon stocks. GFDL-ESM4.1 simulates a distinct response of forest carbon stocks across the tropical biome and among climate change scenarios. The model concurs with observations in predicting a larger forest biomass in the Paleotropics (tropical areas of Africa and Asia) than in the Neotropics (tropical Americas) under current climate conditions. Projection experiments suggest that climate change will exacerbate regional differences in tropical forest biomass.

Under low emission scenarios, enhanced productivity due to CO₂ fertilization promotes increases in forest biomass that lasts until the end of the century. Under high emissions, positive trends reverse after 2060, when simulated fires prompt forest loss that results in a 40% decline in tropical forest biomass by 2100. Projected fires occur under dry conditions associated with El Niño Southern Oscillation and the Atlantic Multidecadal Oscillation, a response observed under current climate conditions, but exacerbated by an overall decline in precipitation. Following the initial disturbance, grassland dominance promotes recurrent fires and tree competitive exclusion, which prevents forest recovery. EC-Earth3-Veg, an Earth System Model (ESM) with a dynamic vegetation model of similar complexity, projected comparable wildfire forest loss under high emissions but faster postfire recovery rates.

The terrestrial biosphere component (LM4.1) of GFDL-ESM4.1 simulates vegetation dynamics by following the fate of individual demographic cohorts of multiple, competing vegetation types, including tropical trees and grasses. Realistic patch dynamics emerge through the simulation of multiple tiles within each grid cell and subgrid scale disturbances like fires. The outcome of height-structured competition among vegetation types and fires results in a mosaic of patches (tiles) with varying degrees of tree dominance, ranging from pure grasslands to forests through savanna landscapes.

These results reveal the importance of understanding complex nonlinear responses to climate change impacts and the urgent need to research postfire recovery and its representation in ESMs. The resilience of tropical forests to climate-induced disturbances should be reassessed. This study demonstrates the importance of taking action to reduce carbon emissions to prevent tropical forest degradation.

Image Source:

1. NOAA website

Additional Image Source:

1. World Meteorological Organization

SDGs, Targets, and Indicators

1. Which SDGs are addressed or connected to the issues highlighted in the article?

• SDG 13: Climate Action
• SDG 15: Life on Land

The article discusses the response of tropical forests to climate change and the potential loss of forest biomass due to fires. These issues are directly connected to SDG 13, which focuses on taking urgent action to combat climate change and its impacts. Additionally, the article highlights the importance of understanding postfire recovery and the resilience of tropical forests, which aligns with SDG 15, which aims to protect, restore, and promote sustainable use of terrestrial ecosystems.

2. What specific targets under those SDGs can be identified based on the article’s content?

• SDG 13.1: Strengthen resilience and adaptive capacity to climate-related hazards and natural disasters
• SDG 13.2: Integrate climate change measures into national policies, strategies, and planning
• SDG 15.1: Ensure conservation, restoration, and sustainable use of terrestrial and inland freshwater ecosystems
• SDG 15.2: Promote the implementation of sustainable management of all types of forests

The article emphasizes the need to understand and enhance the resilience of tropical forests to climate-induced disturbances such as fires. This aligns with SDG 13.1, which aims to strengthen resilience and adaptive capacity to climate-related hazards. The article also highlights the importance of incorporating climate change measures into policies and planning, which corresponds to SDG 13.2.

In terms of SDG 15, the article emphasizes the need to research postfire recovery and promote sustainable management of forests. This aligns with SDG 15.1, which focuses on the conservation, restoration, and sustainable use of terrestrial ecosystems. Additionally, the article highlights the potential loss of forest biomass, indicating the need to implement sustainable forest management practices, as targeted by SDG 15.2.

3. Are there any indicators mentioned or implied in the article that can be used to measure progress towards the identified targets?

Yes, the article mentions several indicators that can be used to measure progress towards the identified targets:

• Forest biomass: The article discusses the response of forest carbon stocks to climate change and the potential decline in tropical forest biomass.
• Fire carbon emissions: The article highlights the role of fires in promoting forest loss and the subsequent decline in forest biomass.
• Productivity due to CO₂ fertilization: The article mentions that under low emission scenarios, enhanced productivity due to CO₂ fertilization promotes increases in forest biomass.
• Postfire recovery rates: The article discusses the postfire recovery rates projected by different Earth System Models (ESMs) and their implications for forest loss and regeneration.

These indicators can be used to measure progress towards the targets by monitoring changes in forest biomass, fire carbon emissions, and the ability of forests to recover after disturbances.

Table: SDGs, Targets, and Indicators

Behold! This splendid article springs forth from the wellspring of knowledge, shaped by a wondrous proprietary AI technology that delved into a vast ocean of data, illuminating the path towards the Sustainable Development Goals. Remember that all rights are reserved by SDG Investors LLC, empowering us to champion progress together.

Source: coyotegulch.blog

Join us, as fellow seekers of change, on a transformative journey at https://sdgtalks.ai/welcome, where you can become a member and actively contribute to shaping a brighter future.