Mothers accused of child neglect will get cash in D.C. poverty study
Mothers accused of child neglect will get cash in D.C. poverty study The Washington Post
Study Explores Impact of Extra Income on Low-Income Black Mothers
Introduction
Twelve low-income Black mothers who the District’s child welfare agency has accused of neglecting their children will soon receive $500 a month as part of a study exploring whether extra income can help improve families’ lives such that the government need not take their children.
The Mother Up Program
The program, called Mother Up, is funded by $1.2 million from the anti-poverty organization Mother’s Outreach Network, which announced Wednesday it will start enrolling eligible mothers and disbursing funds. Working with Harvard Law School’s Access to Justice Lab, which is leading the research for the program, the group will examine whether the no-strings-attached payments curb the likelihood of families being separated.
Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
- Goal 1: No Poverty
- Goal 5: Gender Equality
- Goal 10: Reduced Inequalities
Addressing Negative Narratives
“The system is penalizing families and taking children away from their homes for being poor,” said Melody Webb, the executive director of Mother’s Outreach Network. “We want to also combat negative narratives about Black women, Black mothers in particular, whose children are involved in the system.”
Eligibility and Parameters
The program is limited to Black mothers who D.C.’s Child and Family Services Agency has investigated for child neglect and found the allegations to be substantiated, but allowed their children to remain at home, said Jim Greiner, the faculty director at the Access to Justice Lab. He conceded that some might think “it’s a terrible idea because it’s going to provide a monetary incentive to neglect children,” while others “think that the underlying problem is poverty, in which case providing money is a fantastic idea because it’ll directly alleviate the problem.”
Child and Family Services Agency’s Role
D.C.’s Child and Family Services Agency investigates families when children are alleged to be victims of physical abuse, neglect, sex trafficking, substance abuse, and domestic violence. If the agency determines a child is the victim of neglect — which means a parent’s actions or habits led to their child’s lack of food, shelter, supervision, education, or medical care — officials then take corrective action, which can range from offering parents child-care resources to removing children from their homes.
Disproportionate Involvement of Black Children and Families
Last year, the Child and Family Services Agency separated 110 children from their families because of alleged neglect, by far the most cited reason for a child’s removal from their home, according to the agency’s report to the D.C. Council. Black children and families are disproportionately involved in the child welfare system, with more than 50 percent of Black children experiencing a child protective services investigation by their 18th birthday. In the District, most children served in their home or in foster care during the first quarter of this year were Black, according to data from the Child and Family Services Agency.
Impact of Poverty on Child Welfare Investigations
Decades of research have shown that when families have less access to money, clothing, housing, food, legal support, and health care, they are more likely to face investigations from child welfare agencies over alleged mistreatment of their children. Research also shows that nearly 85 percent of families investigated by child protective services nationwide have incomes below 200 percent of the federal poverty line, which was $49,720 last year for a family of three.
The Study and Program Parameters
As part of the study in D.C., researchers will randomly enroll 12 mothers into a group that receives $500 a month until October, and then a lump sum of about $3,000. Another 12 will be assigned to a group that is only reimbursed about $50 to $60 for a 20-minute survey and an up to hour-long interview. The program is funded through various foundations and organizations — but not the government, Webb said. This was purposeful, she added, as many families she works with distrust the government.
Conclusion
The program is in a “pre-pilot” stage, and researchers hope to test its feasibility before expanding it to more participants and a full-scale investigation. “For this particular problem, folks are in a form of legal jeopardy,” Greiner said. “There’s a lot of strong feelings on both sides, and what we think should happen in that context is evidence. Let’s actually take a look at what happens when you take steps to alleviate poverty.”
SDGs, Targets, and Indicators Analysis
1. Which SDGs are addressed or connected to the issues highlighted in the article?
- SDG 1: No Poverty
- SDG 5: Gender Equality
- SDG 10: Reduced Inequalities
- SDG 16: Peace, Justice, and Strong Institutions
The article discusses the issue of child neglect and the disproportionate involvement of Black families in the child welfare system. These issues are connected to SDG 1 (No Poverty) as poverty plays a significant role in how families come to the attention of child welfare agencies. SDG 5 (Gender Equality) is also relevant as the article highlights the negative narratives about Black women and mothers involved in the system. SDG 10 (Reduced Inequalities) is addressed as the program aims to provide extra income to low-income Black mothers to improve their lives and prevent child removal. Finally, SDG 16 (Peace, Justice, and Strong Institutions) is connected as the program aims to combat negative narratives and explore alternative solutions to child removal.
2. What specific targets under those SDGs can be identified based on the article’s content?
- Target 1.3: Implement nationally appropriate social protection systems and measures for all, including floors, and by 2030 achieve substantial coverage of the poor and the vulnerable.
- Target 5.4: Recognize and value unpaid care and domestic work through the provision of public services, infrastructure, and social protection policies and the promotion of shared responsibility within the household and the family.
- Target 10.2: By 2030, empower and promote the social, economic, and political inclusion of all, irrespective of age, sex, disability, race, ethnicity, origin, religion, or economic or other status.
- Target 16.3: Promote the rule of law at the national and international levels and ensure equal access to justice for all.
Based on the article’s content, the specific targets identified are related to providing social protection systems and measures for vulnerable populations (Target 1.3), recognizing and valuing unpaid care work (Target 5.4), promoting social and economic inclusion (Target 10.2), and ensuring equal access to justice (Target 16.3).
3. Are there any indicators mentioned or implied in the article that can be used to measure progress towards the identified targets?
- Indicator 1.3.1: Proportion of the population covered by social protection floors/systems, by sex, distinguishing children, unemployed persons, older persons, persons with disabilities, pregnant women, newborns, work-injury victims, and the poor and vulnerable.
- Indicator 5.4.1: Proportion of time spent on unpaid domestic and care work, by sex, age, and location.
- Indicator 10.2.1: Proportion of people living below 50 percent of median income, by age, sex, and persons with disabilities.
- Indicator 16.3.3: Proportion of victims of violence in the previous 12 months who reported their victimization to competent authorities or other officially recognized mechanisms.
The article does not explicitly mention indicators; however, based on the identified targets, the indicators mentioned above can be used to measure progress towards achieving those targets.
SDGs, Targets, and Indicators Table
SDGs | Targets | Indicators |
---|---|---|
SDG 1: No Poverty | Target 1.3: Implement nationally appropriate social protection systems and measures for all, including floors, and by 2030 achieve substantial coverage of the poor and the vulnerable. | Indicator 1.3.1: Proportion of the population covered by social protection floors/systems, by sex, distinguishing children, unemployed persons, older persons, persons with disabilities, pregnant women, newborns, work-injury victims, and the poor and vulnerable. |
SDG 5: Gender Equality | Target 5.4: Recognize and value unpaid care and domestic work through the provision of public services, infrastructure, and social protection policies and the promotion of shared responsibility within the household and the family. | Indicator 5.4.1: Proportion of time spent on unpaid domestic and care work, by sex, age, and location. |
SDG 10: Reduced Inequalities | Target 10.2: By 2030, empower and promote the social, economic, and political inclusion of all, irrespective of age, sex, disability, race, ethnicity, origin, religion, or economic or other status. | Indicator 10.2.1: Proportion of people living below 50 percent of median income, by age, sex, and persons with disabilities. |
SDG 16: Peace, Justice, and Strong Institutions | Target 16.3: Promote the rule of law at the national and international levels and ensure equal access to justice for all. | Indicator 16.3.3: Proportion of victims of violence in the previous 12 months who reported their victimization to competent authorities or other officially recognized mechanisms. |
Behold! This splendid article springs forth from the wellspring of knowledge, shaped by a wondrous proprietary AI technology that delved into a vast ocean of data, illuminating the path towards the Sustainable Development Goals. Remember that all rights are reserved by SDG Investors LLC, empowering us to champion progress together.
Source: washingtonpost.com
Join us, as fellow seekers of change, on a transformative journey at https://sdgtalks.ai/welcome, where you can become a member and actively contribute to shaping a brighter future.