NY Court Official Fired on Eve of Testimony Critiquing Child Welfare
NY Court Official Fired on Eve of Testimony Critiquing Child Welfare The Imprint
sdgtalks
Almost Everyone Agrees NY Should Double Pay for Attorneys for Parents and Kids. Will it Finally Make it into the Budget?
By Michael Fitzgerald
- Introduction
- In the world of child welfare and family courts, terminations and demotions often go unnoticed by the public.
- Angela Burton, a top advisor to the New York state court system, was recently fired and wanted people to know why.
- Burton has been advocating for a radical rethinking of the foster care system, highlighting its negative impact on low-income families of color.
- Burton’s Firing and the Resistance to Change
- Burton was fired after planning to speak about how the federal Child Abuse and Prevention Treatment Act contributes to “antiBlack family policing.”
- Her bosses claimed that her remarks would undermine public confidence in the court’s impartiality.
- Her termination reflects a growing resistance to new voices calling for change in the child welfare field.
- Response from the Office of Court Administration
- The Office of Court Administration declined to comment on Burton’s firing, citing their policy of not discussing personnel issues or decisions.
- Burton insists that her dismissal was solely due to her disagreement with the court system’s restrictions on her right to speak as an individual.
- Burton’s Planned Remarks and Advocacy
- Burton had planned to speak to members of Congress and a civil rights panel about the impact of the child welfare system on Black families.
- She argues that funding should be prioritized for family support rather than family policing, and that racism is embedded in the discretion given to child welfare agencies and judges.
- Burton’s Career and Contributions
- Prior to joining the court administration, Burton had a career in academia and state government.
- She has advised on influential reports that highlight the impact of racism in the child welfare system and the need for improved legal representation for parents.
- Burton is known for her blunt social media presence and her calls for change in the child welfare system.
SDGs, Targets, and Indicators
1. Which SDGs are addressed or connected to the issues highlighted in the article?
- SDG 10: Reduced Inequalities
- SDG 16: Peace, Justice, and Strong Institutions
2. What specific targets under those SDGs can be identified based on the article’s content?
- SDG 10.2: By 2030, empower and promote the social, economic, and political inclusion of all, irrespective of age, sex, disability, race, ethnicity, origin, religion, or economic or other status.
- SDG 16.7: Ensure responsive, inclusive, participatory, and representative decision-making at all levels.
3. Are there any indicators mentioned or implied in the article that can be used to measure progress towards the identified targets?
- Indicator for SDG 10.2: Proportion of people who feel discriminated against or harassed in the past 12 months on the basis of a personal characteristic.
- Indicator for SDG 16.7: Proportion of population satisfied with their involvement in decision-making processes.
4. Table: SDGs, Targets, and Indicators
| SDGs | Targets | Indicators |
|---|---|---|
| SDG 10: Reduced Inequalities | Target 10.2: By 2030, empower and promote the social, economic, and political inclusion of all, irrespective of age, sex, disability, race, ethnicity, origin, religion, or economic or other status. | Indicator: Proportion of people who feel discriminated against or harassed in the past 12 months on the basis of a personal characteristic. |
| SDG 16: Peace, Justice, and Strong Institutions | Target 16.7: Ensure responsive, inclusive, participatory, and representative decision-making at all levels. | Indicator: Proportion of population satisfied with their involvement in decision-making processes. |
The issues highlighted in the article are connected to SDG 10: Reduced Inequalities and SDG 16: Peace, Justice, and Strong Institutions. SDG 10 aims to reduce inequalities and promote social, economic, and political inclusion for all individuals. SDG 16 focuses on ensuring responsive, inclusive, participatory, and representative decision-making at all levels.
Based on the article’s content, the specific targets that can be identified are Target 10.2 under SDG 10 and Target 16.7 under SDG 16. Target 10.2 aims to empower and promote the social, economic, and political inclusion of all individuals, regardless of their characteristics or status. Target 16.7 aims to ensure that decision-making processes are responsive, inclusive, participatory, and representative.
The article does not explicitly mention indicators related to these targets. However, indicators can be used to measure progress towards these targets. For Target 10.2, an indicator could be the proportion of people who feel discriminated against or harassed based on a personal characteristic. For Target 16.7, an indicator could be the proportion of the population satisfied with their involvement in decision-making processes.
In summary, the issues discussed in the article are connected to SDG 10 and SDG 16. The specific targets identified are Target 10.2 and Target 16.7. Indicators related to these targets can be used to measure progress towards achieving them.
Behold! This splendid article springs forth from the wellspring of knowledge, shaped by a wondrous proprietary AI technology that delved into a vast ocean of data, illuminating the path towards the Sustainable Development Goals. Remember that all rights are reserved by SDG Investors LLC, empowering us to champion progress together.
Source: imprintnews.org
Join us, as fellow seekers of change, on a transformative journey at https://sdgtalks.ai/welcome, where you can become a member and actively contribute to shaping a brighter future.
