DeSantis reinstates Florida’s suspended affordable housing director

DeSantis reinstates Florida's suspended affordable housing director  Tampa Bay Times

DeSantis reinstates Florida’s suspended affordable housing director

TALLAHASSEE — Gov. Ron DeSantis Reinstates Florida’s Affordable Housing Director

TALLAHASSEE — Gov. Ron DeSantis reinstated Florida’s affordable housing director on Friday, a month after he was suspended pending the outcome of an inspector general investigation.

Mike DiNapoli Returns as Director of Florida Housing Finance Corporation

Starting Monday, Mike DiNapoli will be back in charge of the Florida Housing Finance Corporation, which distributes hundreds of millions of dollars for affordable housing projects across the state each year.

DiNapoli, 54, was DeSantis’ pick to lead the corporation after its previous leader abruptly resigned in January, following the governor’s re-election.

Investigation into Allegations of Hostile Work Environment

DiNapoli was placed on paid administrative leave on July 21 pending the outcome of an inspector general investigation into allegations that he created a hostile work environment, according to current and former employees. While on leave, he was not allowed to access emails or enter the corporation’s headquarters in downtown Tallahassee.

The status of that investigation is unknown. Neither the corporation nor the governor’s office has confirmed his placement on leave or given any other statement on the subject to the Times/Herald. DeSantis’ office did not respond to requests for comment for this story.

But in a statement to Politico, published about 20 minutes after corporation staff were notified late Friday, the governor’s office said DiNapoli should never have been placed on leave.

“The inquiry into FHFC to date has found nothing to justify the placement of Mr. DiNapoli on administrative leave,” a spokesperson for the governor’s office told Politico. “Moreover, it is clear that FHFC’s administrative actions were unsanctioned and without a full board action, and did not warrant proper due process.”

Reinstatement Announcement

Just before 5 p.m. Friday, the corporation’s longtime chief financial officer, Angie Sellers, emailed all staff, writing the “governor’s office directed” that DiNapoli be reinstated and that he would likely be in the office on Monday, according to a copy of the email seen by the Times/Herald.

“Let’s continue to focus on providing opportunities for safe and affordable housing for the citizens of Florida,” Sellers wrote. “You are the backbone of our successful administration of our programs.”

About Florida Housing Finance Corporation

The Florida Housing Finance Corp. was created by the Legislature in 1980 to serve as a bank that administers billions of dollars in affordable housing loans for developers, federal low-income tax credits, mortgage assistance and other programs. State lawmakers this spring assigned the corporation $711 million to build new units across the state in response to Florida’s affordability crisis.

Mike DiNapoli’s Background

DiNapoli was recommended to lead the corporation by DeSantis’ chief of staff, James Uthmeier, who is now directing the governor’s campaign for president. DiNapoli makes $185,000 per year.

Before coming to Florida, DiNapoli was a financial adviser in New York City for decades until 2015, when he lost his job with the Swiss financial services firm UBS. Weeks later, a woman who claimed DiNapoli was her brother and financial adviser filed a complaint alleging that DiNapoli “stole money from her account as well as forged her name to a check that was addressed to her and deposited those funds in another account.”

Between 2015 and 2017, DiNapoli experienced a series of legal actions relating to his personal finances, including having his bank accounts garnished to recoup outstanding debts, having his lender foreclose on his Ocala home and filing for bankruptcy.

Resignations and Discrimination Complaints

In 2017, he was hired at the Department of Economic Opportunity, now known as the Department of Commerce, as a deputy chief. He was promoted to lead the department’s Office of Small and Minority Business Capital, administering the state’s emergency bridge loan program, which issues interest-free loans to businesses and local governments after disasters, and the Homeowner Assistance Fund, which gave money to homeowners to pay their mortgages during the coronavirus pandemic.

Since he took the job in February, the office has seen a wave of resignations. DiNapoli also fired the corporation’s longtime general counsel, who doubled as its chief ethics officer, and the corporation’s liaison to the board, Sheila Freaney.

Freaney has filed discrimination complaints alleging she was fired after reporting “wrongdoing,” including “irregular spending practices,” by DiNapoli, her lawyer told the Times/Herald earlier this month.

Upcoming Inspector General Investigation Results

The results of the inspector general investigation are expected to be released at the corporation’s next board meeting on Sept. 8.

SDGs, Targets, and Indicators

  1. SDGs Addressed or Connected to the Issues

    • SDG 11: Sustainable Cities and Communities
    • SDG 1: No Poverty
    • SDG 5: Gender Equality
    • SDG 16: Peace, Justice, and Strong Institutions

    The issues highlighted in the article are connected to these SDGs because they involve affordable housing, creating a hostile work environment, and allegations of irregular spending practices.

  2. Specific Targets Based on the Article’s Content

    • Target 11.1: By 2030, ensure access for all to adequate, safe, and affordable housing and basic services and upgrade slums.
    • Target 1.2: By 2030, reduce at least by half the proportion of men, women, and children of all ages living in poverty in all its dimensions according to national definitions.
    • Target 5.1: End all forms of discrimination against all women and girls everywhere.
    • Target 16.5: Substantially reduce corruption and bribery in all their forms.

    The article discusses the reinstatement of the affordable housing director and the allegations of a hostile work environment, which are related to Target 11.1. The financial struggles and legal actions faced by the director are connected to Target 1.2. The discrimination complaints filed by a former employee relate to Target 5.1. The investigation into irregular spending practices aligns with Target 16.5.

  3. Indicators Mentioned or Implied in the Article

    • Indicator 11.1.1: Proportion of urban population living in slums, informal settlements, or inadequate housing.
    • Indicator 1.2.2: Poverty gap ratio.
    • Indicator 5.1.1: Whether or not legal frameworks are in place to promote, enforce, and monitor equality and non-discrimination on the basis of sex.
    • Indicator 16.5.1: Proportion of persons who had at least one contact with a public official and who paid a bribe to a public official, or were asked for a bribe by those public officials, during the previous 12 months.

    The article does not explicitly mention indicators, but the issues discussed can be measured using these indicators. The proportion of the urban population living in inadequate housing can be used to measure progress towards Target 11.1.1. The poverty gap ratio can be used to measure progress towards Target 1.2.2. The presence of legal frameworks promoting equality and non-discrimination can be used to measure progress towards Target 5.1.1. The proportion of individuals involved in bribery or corruption can be used to measure progress towards Target 16.5.1.

SDGs Targets Indicators
SDG 11: Sustainable Cities and Communities Target 11.1: By 2030, ensure access for all to adequate, safe, and affordable housing and basic services and upgrade slums. Indicator 11.1.1: Proportion of urban population living in slums, informal settlements, or inadequate housing.
SDG 1: No Poverty Target 1.2: By 2030, reduce at least by half the proportion of men, women, and children of all ages living in poverty in all its dimensions according to national definitions. Indicator 1.2.2: Poverty gap ratio.
SDG 5: Gender Equality Target 5.1: End all forms of discrimination against all women and girls everywhere. Indicator 5.1.1: Whether or not legal frameworks are in place to promote, enforce, and monitor equality and non-discrimination on the basis of sex.
SDG 16: Peace, Justice, and Strong Institutions Target 16.5: Substantially reduce corruption and bribery in all their forms. Indicator 16.5.1: Proportion of persons who had at least one contact with a public official and who paid a bribe to a public official, or were asked for a bribe by those public officials, during the previous 12 months.

Behold! This splendid article springs forth from the wellspring of knowledge, shaped by a wondrous proprietary AI technology that delved into a vast ocean of data, illuminating the path towards the Sustainable Development Goals. Remember that all rights are reserved by SDG Investors LLC, empowering us to champion progress together.

Source: tampabay.com

 

Join us, as fellow seekers of change, on a transformative journey at https://sdgtalks.ai/welcome, where you can become a member and actively contribute to shaping a brighter future.