Energy-efficient buildings save lives during extreme weather events: Department of Energy

Sustainable Development Goals and Building Resilience

Dive Brief:

• A recent U.S. Department of Energy report found that improving passive energy efficiency performance in buildings prevents deaths and keeps occupants safer during extreme weather events.
• The report studied correlations between power outages and extreme temperature events, measurement of passive survivability, occupant and property damage, and a cost-benefit analysis of achieving, meeting and exceeding energy code provisions.
• Sample results showed that implementing passive building measures to meet or exceed current codes can improve habitability by as much as 120% during extreme cold and up to 140% during extreme heat.

Dive Insight:

The report addressed whether energy-efficient buildings could keep occupants safer during power outages. This idea has been a key element of a pilot credit on passive sustainability in the U.S. Green Building Council’s Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design, or LEED, rating system.

The built environment will likely face extreme weather events “of greater magnitude and extent over the next half-century,” DOE said in the report, emphasizing that these events often cause power outages that extend beyond the initial disaster. The DOE also noted that building conditions can affect the level of exposure occupants and property encounter during extreme heat events, which can result in costly damages to worker productivity, health and property.

The study determined that building resilience benefits often extend beyond the building itself. For instance, building-grid integration and connected HVAC systems can lessen peak demands on utility grids and increase the stability of overarching energy grid systems.

The report, which addresses both new construction and existing buildings, found that strengthening the resilience of buildings equips communities, states and the nation to effectively tackle complex risks and uncertainties stemming from disruptive weather events.

In an interview with Facilities Dive, Craig Carroll, the Environmental Protection Agency’s response and removal branch chief manager for Region 6, noted the importance of ensuring that facilities comply with local and federal regulations. He pointed to planning and compliance as two key differentiators in gauging and responding to the severity of emergency outcomes. “If you’re spending your time routinely complying with [regulations], that’s going to allow you to take care of the majority of your issues before they become real issues,” he said.

The DOE underscored the effectiveness of implementing energy-efficiency technologies and design strategies in strengthening the resilience of buildings and the overarching energy system before, during and after major disruptive events.

Energy codes have a direct impact on energy-resilience outcomes. That impact includes increased thermal resistance and an ability for buildings to maintain comfortable indoor environments. The researchers said that because these building codes typically meet established criteria such as technological feasibility and cost effectiveness, they are “uniquely positioned to promote resilience” as a policy instrument.

The research methodology includes two valuation metrics — a passive survivability metrics’ Standard Effective Temperature degree hours and the heat index, which are part of the EnergyPlus building simulation program’s output reports. These metrics can be “readily applied to indicate the resilience benefit of increased efficiency,” the DOE said.

The report, commissioned by the DOE’s Building Technology Office, focuses on six U.S. cities and includes research from experts at the Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, National Renewable Energy Laboratory and the Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory. The effort, launched as a result of climate-driven disasters, builds on previous efforts by the DOE’s Building Technologies Office to identify building resilience metrics.

SDGs, Targets, and Indicators

1. Which SDGs are addressed or connected to the issues highlighted in the article?

• SDG 11: Sustainable Cities and Communities
• SDG 7: Affordable and Clean Energy
• SDG 13: Climate Action
• SDG 9: Industry, Innovation, and Infrastructure

2. What specific targets under those SDGs can be identified based on the article’s content?

• Target 11.5: By 2030, significantly reduce the number of deaths and the number of people affected and substantially decrease the direct economic losses relative to global gross domestic product caused by disasters, including water-related disasters, with a focus on protecting the poor and people in vulnerable situations.
• Target 7.3: By 2030, double the global rate of improvement in energy efficiency.
• Target 13.1: Strengthen resilience and adaptive capacity to climate-related hazards and natural disasters in all countries.
• Target 9.4: Upgrade infrastructure and retrofit industries to make them sustainable, with increased resource-use efficiency and greater adoption of clean and environmentally sound technologies and industrial processes, with all countries taking action in accordance with their respective capabilities.

3. Are there any indicators mentioned or implied in the article that can be used to measure progress towards the identified targets?

No indicators are mentioned or implied in the article that can be used to measure progress towards the identified targets.

4. SDGs, Targets, and Indicators

Behold! This splendid article springs forth from the wellspring of knowledge, shaped by a wondrous proprietary AI technology that delved into a vast ocean of data, illuminating the path towards the Sustainable Development Goals. Remember that all rights are reserved by SDG Investors LLC, empowering us to champion progress together.

Source: utilitydive.com

Join us, as fellow seekers of change, on a transformative journey at https://sdgtalks.ai/welcome, where you can become a member and actively contribute to shaping a brighter future.