‘Roving sentinels’ discover new air pollution sources

Innovative Approach to Air Quality Monitoring Reveals Pollution Hotspots

Introduction

In 2019, University of Utah atmospheric scientists, the Environmental Defense Fund and other partners added a new tool to their quiver of air quality monitors—two Google Street View cars, Salt Lake Valley’s roving sentinels that would detect hyper-local air pollution hotspots. In the ensuing months John Lin, professor of atmospheric sciences at the U, developed a new modeling approach that used modeled wind-patterns and statistical analysis to trace pollution back to its source location to a scale previously missed by coarser scale monitoring projects that have traditionally characterized air quality averaged over an entire urban airshed.

Research Findings

In a U- and Environmental Defense Fund (EFD)-led study that published in the October 2023 issue of the journal Atmospheric Environment, the results are in.

“With mobile vehicles, you can literally send them anywhere that they could drive to map out pollution, including sources that are off the road that previous monitoring missed,” said Lin, who also serves as associate director of the Wilkes Center for Climate Science & Policy. “I think the roving sentinel idea would be quite doable for a lot of cities.”

Data Collection and Analysis

The researchers loaded the vehicles with air quality instrumentation and directed drivers to trawl through neighborhoods street by street, taking one air sample per second to create a massive dataset of air pollutant concentrations in the Salt Lake Valley from May 2019 to March 2020. The observations yielded the highest-resolution map yet of pollution hotspots at fine scales—the data captured variability within 200 meters, or about two football fields.

“The big takeaway is that there is a lot of spatial variability of air pollution from one end of a block to another. There can be big differences in what people are breathing, and that scale is not captured by the typical regulatory monitors and the policy that the U.S. EPA uses to control air pollution,” said Tammy Thompson, senior air quality scientist for EDF and co-author of the study.

Implications for Environmental Justice

Air quality patterns were as expected, with higher pollution around traffic and industrial areas. Pollutants were higher in neighborhoods with lower average incomes and a higher percentage of Black residents, confirming a well-known issue of environmental justice. This pattern traces its legacy to redlining policies from a century ago when the Homeowner’s Loan Corp. created maps that outlined “hazardous” neighborhoods in red ink. The redlined neighborhoods often had poor air quality due to industrial activities that existed alongside residents, who were often People of Color. Urban planners exacerbated the environmental issues by using the maps as justification to build highways and permit industrial companies in the so-called hazardous areas.

Next Steps

The authors hope that other places will utilize the new method to identify pollution hotspots sources to make their cities safer, including identifying temporary sources, such as gas leaks, and permanent sources, such as industrial sources. Roving sentinels could help policymakers enact regulations and more effectively utilize resources to mitigate damage to their citizens.

The authors hope to utilize the atmospheric model for projects such as Air Tracker, a first-of-its-kind web-based tool that helps users find the likely source of air pollution in their neighborhoods. Run on real-time, trusted scientific models and coupled with air pollution and weather data and developed in partnership with the U, EDF and the CREATE Lab at Carnegie Mellon University, Air Tracker helps users learn more about the air they’re breathing, including pollution concentrations and its potential sources. Air Tracker is live in Salt Lake City Valley and will be rolled out to more locations across the country in the next couple of months.

Conclusion

“There are a lot of important environmental justice aspects to this work,” said Thompson of the EDF. “We need to be able to understand what average air pollution looks like in different communities, and then understand why there is variability and why there are hotspots, and therefore what we can do about it. It’s really, really important as we learn more and more about inequity in air pollution and what we’re breathing across the country.”

The research that published as “Towards hyperlocal source identification of pollutants in cities by combining mobile measurements with atmospheric modeling,” utilized resources of the U’s Center for High Performance Computing for computing the spatial distribution of pollution and developing the methodology for locating emission sources.

Other authors of the article are Ben Fasoli of the U’s Department of Atmospheric Sciences, Logan Mitchell of Utah Clean Energy, Ryan Bares of the Utah Department of Environmental Quality, Francesca Hopkins of the Department of Environmental Sciences at University of California, Riverside, and Ramón Alvarez of the Environmental Defense Fund.

SDGs, Targets, and Indicators

1. Which SDGs are addressed or connected to the issues highlighted in the article?

• SDG 3: Good Health and Well-being
• SDG 11: Sustainable Cities and Communities
• SDG 13: Climate Action
• SDG 15: Life on Land

2. What specific targets under those SDGs can be identified based on the article’s content?

• SDG 3.9: By 2030, substantially reduce the number of deaths and illnesses from hazardous chemicals and air, water, and soil pollution and contamination.
• SDG 11.6: By 2030, reduce the adverse per capita environmental impact of cities, including by paying special attention to air quality and municipal and other waste management.
• SDG 13.2: Integrate climate change measures into national policies, strategies, and planning.
• SDG 15.1: By 2020, ensure the conservation, restoration, and sustainable use of terrestrial and inland freshwater ecosystems and their services.

3. Are there any indicators mentioned or implied in the article that can be used to measure progress towards the identified targets?

The article mentions several indicators that can be used to measure progress towards the identified targets:

• Ambient air pollutant concentrations
• Nitrous oxides (NOx) emissions
• Black carbon (BC) emissions
• Fine particulate matter (PM2.5) levels
• Methane emissions

These indicators can be measured using the air quality instrumentation installed in the Google Street View cars and the atmospheric modeling method developed by the researchers.

Table: SDGs, Targets, and Indicators

Behold! This splendid article springs forth from the wellspring of knowledge, shaped by a wondrous proprietary AI technology that delved into a vast ocean of data, illuminating the path towards the Sustainable Development Goals. Remember that all rights are reserved by SDG Investors LLC, empowering us to champion progress together.

Source: eurekalert.org

Join us, as fellow seekers of change, on a transformative journey at https://sdgtalks.ai/welcome, where you can become a member and actively contribute to shaping a brighter future.