What are the advantages of investment treaty claims potentially available to Credit Suisse AT1 bondholders?

Investment Treaty Arbitration: A Report on the Advantages and Protection Afforded

In many instances, investment treaty arbitration, if available, can prove to be more advantageous than litigating in the domestic courts.

Advantages of Investment Treaty Arbitration

• The dispute being decided by an independent panel of arbitrators outside the territory of the state against which a claim is pursued (often referred to as the “respondent-state”);
• The dispute being decided by reference to public international law rather than the local law of the respondent-state; and
• The dispute taking less time to conclude, particularly if ultimate success and recoveries in the domestic courts are only likely to be achieved following multiple proceedings and appeals.

Against the backdrop of the Credit Suisse rescue in March 2023, partner Alejandro Garcia, senior associate Ilyas Bulut and associate Marco Piccolo explain the protection afforded by investment treaties and the advantages of making such claims.

What happened to the Credit Suisse AT1 bonds?

In March 2023, UBS reached an agreement to rescue Credit Suisse, brokered by the Swiss authorities. The Swiss regulator allocated the losses arising from the rescue to holders of Credit Suisse’s Additional Tier 1 (AT1) capital bonds. This move was deemed to be somewhat controversial by many market participants, who considered that AT1 bonds would take precedence over equity in a bank’s capital structure.

Necessarily, much of the initial focus was on Swiss law causes of action and remedies available to aggrieved AT1 bondholders. However, certain international agreements protecting investments (“Investment Treaties”) to which Switzerland is a party, may offer AT1 bondholders parallel or alternative routes to recovery. Such avenues for redress may be available on the basis that the Swiss regulator’s actions may have been inconsistent, as some voices have argued, with the country’s obligations under such treaties.

Protections under Investment Treaties

Like most countries, Switzerland has entered into Investment Treaties, including bilateral and multilateral treaties (as well as other instruments containing investment protections such as free trade agreements). In total, Switzerland is a party to 110 Investment Treaties, including instruments concluded with Argentina, Chile, China, Colombia, Costa Rica, Croatia, the Czech Republic, the Dominican Republic, Egypt, Hong Kong, Hungary, Kuwait, Latvia, Libya, Lithuania, Malaysia, Mexico, Oman, Peru, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, Singapore, Slovakia, Slovenia, Thailand, Turkey, the UAE and Uruguay, among others.

A significant number of Investment Treaties concluded by Switzerland share the following important characteristics:

• They protect all types of assets (including bonds).
• They grant protections against disproportionate, discriminatory or arbitrary treatment by the Swiss state (ie all the executive, judicial and legislative authorities of Switzerland), its bodies and agencies.
• They impose an obligation on Switzerland to accord fair and equitable treatment to foreign investments, protecting them against substantial changes to the “rules of the game” under which an investment was originally made.
• They provide guarantees against illegal expropriation and measures that have the effect of expropriation (so-called indirect expropriation).
• They allow an affected foreign investor to sue Switzerland directly before an international arbitral tribunal, thus avoiding having to resort to national courts. This ensures the neutrality and independence of those who will resolve the dispute.
• The breach of the protections contained in Investment Treaties generally confers on the affected party the right to secure compensation not only for the losses suffered but also for loss of profits.
• The protections offered by Investment Treaties are based on public international law. In practice, this means the protections it provides are immune from any legislative changes (including constitutional changes) that could take place in Switzerland.
• If a foreign investor affected by a breach of the protections under an Investment Treaty obtains a favourable decision (award) and requires its enforcement, the process is facilitated by two international treaties that Switzerland has concluded:
  • the Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards (known as the New York Convention); and
  • if the arbitration has been pursued at ICSID, the Convention on the Settlement of Investment Disputes between States and Nationals of Other States (known as the ICSID Convention). This is a specific dispute resolution mechanism for investment cases created under the auspices of the World Bank.

If the actions of the Swiss government (including any of its organs) in connection with the Credit Suisse AT1 bonds were discriminatory or disproportionate, many commentators view these as potentially amounting to a violation by Switzerland of its obligations under Investment Treaties. On this basis, even if the Swiss government’s actions were legal under the emergency legislation that was passed to structure the takeover (which favoured shareholders over AT1 bondholders), and a write-down of the AT1 bonds was provided for under the terms of the bonds, an investment treaty claim could remain viable based on how the state treated the bondholders and their investment. What is more, an investment treaty claim may circumvent any difficulties AT1 bondholders may encounter in any claims before the local Swiss courts.

SDGs, Targets, and Indicators in the Article

1. Which SDGs are addressed or connected to the issues highlighted in the article?

• SDG 16: Peace, Justice, and Strong Institutions
• SDG 17: Partnerships for the Goals

The article discusses the advantages of investment treaty arbitration over litigating in domestic courts. This relates to SDG 16, which aims to promote peaceful and inclusive societies for sustainable development, provide access to justice for all, and build effective, accountable, and inclusive institutions at all levels. The use of investment treaties and international arbitration panels helps ensure impartiality and access to justice outside the territory of the respondent-state.

Additionally, SDG 17 focuses on strengthening global partnerships to achieve the goals. The article mentions bilateral and multilateral investment treaties that Switzerland has entered into with various countries. These treaties promote cooperation and collaboration between nations for the protection of investments.

2. What specific targets under those SDGs can be identified based on the article’s content?

• Target 16.3: Promote the rule of law at the national and international levels and ensure equal access to justice for all.
• Target 17.16: Enhance the global partnership for sustainable development, complemented by multi-stakeholder partnerships that mobilize and share knowledge, expertise, technology, and financial resources.

The article highlights the advantages of investment treaty arbitration, which aligns with Target 16.3 by promoting access to justice at the international level. It also emphasizes the importance of international agreements and partnerships (investment treaties) in protecting investments, supporting Target 17.16.

3. Are there any indicators mentioned or implied in the article that can be used to measure progress towards the identified targets?

Yes, the article mentions indicators that can be used to measure progress towards the identified targets:

• Existence and effectiveness of investment treaties: The number of investment treaties that a country has entered into and their effectiveness in protecting investments can be an indicator of progress towards Target 17.16.
• Number of investment treaty claims: The number of investment treaty claims filed by investors against a country can indicate the level of access to justice and adherence to international law, contributing to progress towards Target 16.3.
• Outcome of investment treaty claims: The success rate and compensation awarded in investment treaty claims can reflect the effectiveness of international arbitration in providing justice and protecting investments.

Table: SDGs, Targets, and Indicators

Behold! This splendid article springs forth from the wellspring of knowledge, shaped by a wondrous proprietary AI technology that delved into a vast ocean of data, illuminating the path towards the Sustainable Development Goals. Remember that all rights are reserved by SDG Investors LLC, empowering us to champion progress together.

Source: lexology.com

Join us, as fellow seekers of change, on a transformative journey at https://sdgtalks.ai/welcome, where you can become a member and actively contribute to shaping a brighter future.