Woke NYC Child Services policies will result in dead black kids
Woke NYC Child Services policies will result in dead black kids New York Post
Watch out, Mr. Mayor: ACS’s Embrace of Woke Ideology Puts Children at Risk
The city Administration for Children’s Services (ACS) has recently come under scrutiny for its adoption of woke ideology, which may lead to tragic consequences for black and Hispanic children under ACS’s care.
ACS Whistleblower Raises Concerns
In a recent article by Naomi Riley in the New York Post, an ACS whistleblower revealed that Commissioner Jess Dannhauser has made changes to the factors that automatically trigger an investigation. Parental substance abuse, drug-related activity, and criminality have been removed from this list. Dannhauser claims that this shift is aimed at focusing on a narrower group of children who are truly in danger.
However, this approach prioritizes keeping families intact over the potential risk to a child’s safety.
Racial Equity Concerns
An unreleased 2022 ACS report, based on a survey of ACS workers, parents, and advocates, describes the agency as a “predatory system” that disproportionately targets black and brown parents. These families allegedly face a different level of scrutiny compared to white families.
This focus on ideology by self-appointed advocates often comes at the expense of the very people they claim to care about.
Ignoring the Full Picture
Data from ACS shows that black families are seven times more likely than white families to be accused of child maltreatment. Additionally, black children living with parents charged with abuse are about seven times more likely to be killed compared to children in white and Asian households.
Unfortunately, the “equity” crowd tends to ignore this alarming statistic.
Prioritizing Child Safety
Former ACS Commissioner David Hansell, who succeeded Gladys Carríon, emphasized the agency’s obligation to assess child safety and protect children from abuse or maltreatment.
It is crucial to intervene promptly to safeguard abused children, as delaying action could have devastating consequences.
SDGs, Targets, and Indicators
SDGs | Targets | Indicators |
---|---|---|
SDG 16: Peace, Justice, and Strong Institutions | Target 16.2: End abuse, exploitation, trafficking, and all forms of violence against and torture of children | Indicator not mentioned in the article |
SDG 5: Gender Equality | Target 5.2: Eliminate all forms of violence against all women and girls in public and private spheres, including trafficking and sexual and other types of exploitation | Indicator not mentioned in the article |
SDG 10: Reduced Inequalities | Target 10.2: By 2030, empower and promote the social, economic, and political inclusion of all, irrespective of age, sex, disability, race, ethnicity, origin, religion or economic or other status | Indicator not mentioned in the article |
SDG 3: Good Health and Well-being | Target 3.1: By 2030, reduce the global maternal mortality ratio to less than 70 per 100,000 live births | Indicator not mentioned in the article |
SDG 4: Quality Education | Target 4.7: By 2030, ensure that all learners acquire the knowledge and skills needed to promote sustainable development, including, among others, through education for sustainable development and sustainable lifestyles | Indicator not mentioned in the article |
SDG 1: No Poverty | Target 1.3: Implement nationally appropriate social protection systems and measures for all, including floors, and by 2030 achieve substantial coverage of the poor and the vulnerable | Indicator not mentioned in the article |
SDG 16: Peace, Justice, and Strong Institutions | Target 16.9: By 2030, provide legal identity for all, including birth registration | Indicator not mentioned in the article |
1. Which SDGs are addressed or connected to the issues highlighted in the article?
SDG 16: Peace, Justice, and Strong Institutions
The issue of child maltreatment and the role of the city Administration for Children’s Services (ACS) in addressing it is connected to SDG 16, which aims to promote peace, justice, and strong institutions.
SDG 5: Gender Equality
The article mentions the targeting of black and brown parents by ACS, which suggests a potential connection to SDG 5, which focuses on achieving gender equality and eliminating violence against women and girls.
SDG 10: Reduced Inequalities
The article highlights the disparities in treatment between black families and white families within the child welfare system, indicating a potential connection to SDG 10, which aims to reduce inequalities.
SDG 3: Good Health and Well-being
The article briefly mentions the risk of harm to children in dangerous situations, which relates to SDG 3, which focuses on promoting good health and well-being.
SDG 4: Quality Education
The article does not directly address education-related issues, so there is no clear connection to SDG 4.
SDG 1: No Poverty
The article does not directly address poverty-related issues, so there is no clear connection to SDG 1.
SDG 16: Peace, Justice, and Strong Institutions
The issue of providing legal identity for all, including birth registration, is not directly addressed in the article, so there is no clear connection to SDG 16.
2. What specific targets under those SDGs can be identified based on the article’s content?
Target 16.2: End abuse, exploitation, trafficking, and all forms of violence against and torture of children
The article highlights concerns about child maltreatment and the need for intervention to protect abused children.
Target 5.2: Eliminate all forms of violence against all women and girls in public and private spheres, including trafficking and sexual and other types of exploitation
The article mentions the targeting of black and brown parents by ACS, which suggests a potential connection to addressing violence against women and girls.
Target 10.2: By 2030, empower and promote the social, economic, and political inclusion of all, irrespective of age, sex, disability, race, ethnicity, origin, religion or economic or other status
The article highlights disparities in treatment between black families and white families within the child welfare system, indicating a need for promoting social and economic inclusion.
Target 3.1: By 2030, reduce the global maternal mortality ratio to less than 70 per 100,000 live births
The article does not directly address maternal mortality, so there is no specific target identified based on the article’s content.
Target 4.7: By 2030, ensure that all learners acquire the knowledge and skills needed to promote sustainable development, including, among others, through education for sustainable development and sustainable lifestyles
The article does not directly address education-related issues, so there is no specific target identified based on the article’s content.
Target 1.3: Implement nationally appropriate social protection systems and measures for all, including floors, and by 2030 achieve substantial coverage of the poor and the vulnerable
The article does not directly address poverty-related issues, so there is no specific target identified based on the article’s content.
Target 16.9: By 2030, provide legal identity for all, including birth registration
The issue of providing legal identity for all is not directly addressed in the article, so there is no specific target identified based on the article’s content.
3. Are there any indicators mentioned or implied in the article that can be used to measure progress towards the identified targets?
The article does not mention or imply any specific indicators that can
Behold! This splendid article springs forth from the wellspring of knowledge, shaped by a wondrous proprietary AI technology that delved into a vast ocean of data, illuminating the path towards the Sustainable Development Goals. Remember that all rights are reserved by SDG Investors LLC, empowering us to champion progress together.
Source: nypost.com
Join us, as fellow seekers of change, on a transformative journey at https://sdgtalks.ai/welcome, where you can become a member and actively contribute to shaping a brighter future.