China’s US land grab key issue in state elections

China’s US land grab key issue in state elections  NewsNation Now

China’s US land grab key issue in state elections

China’s US land grab key issue in state elections

Chinese Farmland Purchases in the U.S. Impact Governors’ Races

The rise in Chinese farmland purchases in the U.S. is having an impact on governors’ races across the nation, posing a possible threat to the nation’s food supply chain and national security.

China’s Efforts to Buy American Farmland

China’s efforts to buy up valuable American farmland have now become a major campaign issue in gubernatorial races. Candidates on both sides of the aisle in Indiana, Missouri, Montana, and North Dakota are highlighting the threats posed by foreign adversaries buying American farmland.

Indiana’s Lt. Gov. Suzanne Crouch

In Indiana, Lt. Gov. Suzanne Crouch is raising awareness of a Chinese company trying to buy farmland near a military base. Crouch emphasizes that this issue is not only about food security but also about national security. She is fighting to protect Indiana’s farmland from foreign ownership.

Montana’s Gov. Greg Gianforte

In Montana, Gov. Greg Gianforte is running on a record of banning countries like China and Russia from purchasing agricultural land during his time in office. Even his Democratic rival, Ryan Busse, agrees that protecting national security should be a bipartisan priority.

Chinese Ownership of American Farmland

The USDA reports that nearly 384,000 acres of agricultural land in the U.S. is owned by China. Over the past five years, Chinese ownership of American farmland has increased by 55%.

SDGs, Targets, and Indicators Analysis

1. Which SDGs are addressed or connected to the issues highlighted in the article?

  • SDG 2: Zero Hunger
  • SDG 15: Life on Land
  • SDG 16: Peace, Justice, and Strong Institutions

The article discusses the impact of Chinese farmland purchases in the US on the nation’s food supply chain and national security. This connects to SDG 2, which aims to achieve zero hunger by ensuring access to safe, nutritious, and sufficient food for all. It also relates to SDG 15, which focuses on protecting, restoring, and promoting sustainable use of terrestrial ecosystems, including land. Additionally, the issue of foreign adversaries buying up American farmland raises concerns about national security, aligning with SDG 16, which aims to promote peaceful and inclusive societies for sustainable development.

2. What specific targets under those SDGs can be identified based on the article’s content?

  • Target 2.4: By 2030, ensure sustainable food production systems and implement resilient agricultural practices that increase productivity and production.
  • Target 15.1: By 2020, ensure the conservation, restoration, and sustainable use of terrestrial and inland freshwater ecosystems and their services.
  • Target 16.6: Develop effective, accountable, and transparent institutions at all levels.

Based on the article’s content, the specific targets that can be identified are Target 2.4 under SDG 2, which focuses on sustainable food production systems and resilient agricultural practices. Target 15.1 under SDG 15 is also relevant as it emphasizes the conservation, restoration, and sustainable use of terrestrial ecosystems. Lastly, Target 16.6 under SDG 16 is applicable as it calls for the development of effective, accountable, and transparent institutions at all levels.

3. Are there any indicators mentioned or implied in the article that can be used to measure progress towards the identified targets?

  • Indicator 2.4.1: Proportion of agricultural area under productive and sustainable agriculture.
  • Indicator 15.1.1: Forest area as a proportion of total land area.
  • Indicator 16.6.1: Primary government expenditures as a proportion of original approved budget, by sector, disaggregated by government functions.

The article does not explicitly mention indicators, but based on the identified targets, the following indicators can be used to measure progress:
– Indicator 2.4.1: This indicator measures the proportion of agricultural area that adopts productive and sustainable agricultural practices. It can be used to assess progress towards achieving sustainable food production systems.
– Indicator 15.1.1: This indicator measures the forest area as a proportion of total land area. It can be used to monitor the conservation and restoration of terrestrial ecosystems.
– Indicator 16.6.1: This indicator measures primary government expenditures as a proportion of the original approved budget, disaggregated by government functions. It can be used to evaluate the transparency and accountability of institutions.

4. Table: SDGs, Targets, and Indicators

SDGs Targets Indicators
SDG 2: Zero Hunger Target 2.4: By 2030, ensure sustainable food production systems and implement resilient agricultural practices that increase productivity and production. Indicator 2.4.1: Proportion of agricultural area under productive and sustainable agriculture.
SDG 15: Life on Land Target 15.1: By 2020, ensure the conservation, restoration, and sustainable use of terrestrial and inland freshwater ecosystems and their services. Indicator 15.1.1: Forest area as a proportion of total land area.
SDG 16: Peace, Justice, and Strong Institutions Target 16.6: Develop effective, accountable, and transparent institutions at all levels. Indicator 16.6.1: Primary government expenditures as a proportion of original approved budget, by sector, disaggregated by government functions.

Behold! This splendid article springs forth from the wellspring of knowledge, shaped by a wondrous proprietary AI technology that delved into a vast ocean of data, illuminating the path towards the Sustainable Development Goals. Remember that all rights are reserved by SDG Investors LLC, empowering us to champion progress together.

Source: newsnationnow.com

 

Join us, as fellow seekers of change, on a transformative journey at https://sdgtalks.ai/welcome, where you can become a member and actively contribute to shaping a brighter future.