India, Philippines go slow on BIT push
India, Philippines go slow on BIT push | Mint Mint
India and the Philippines Slow on Bilateral Investment Treaty (BIT) Negotiations
NEW DELHI: A push by India and the Philippines to renegotiate their investment agreement is moving slowly, according to persons aware of the matter. The agreement, which was signed in 2000 and came into force in 2001, expired in 2011. New Delhi has called for the agreement to be terminated and replaced by a new Bilateral Investment Treaty (BIT).
Negotiations Delayed by COVID-19 Pandemic
The negotiations were delayed by the covid-19 pandemic. According to persons cited above, both sides also discussed kicking off the talks in June during a meeting between foreign ministers S. Jaishankar and Enrique Manalo.
Progress on Preferential Trade Agreement (PTA)
Those talks also saw progress on signing a preferential trade agreement (PTA). After the meeting, the two sides are understood to have had a round of talks virtually where they exchanged their templates for an investment agreement.
Slow Progress in Talks
However, those talks did not make much progress and matters have progressed little since.
Indian Investments in the Philippines
Indian investments in the Philippines are valued at around $900 million. Bilateral trade stands at around $3 billion in 2022-23.
India’s Negotiations on Investment Treaties
India is negotiating investment treaties alongside free trade agreements with several of its trading partners, including the UK and EU, that are looking for stronger investment protection than afforded by the 2016 model BIT.
Impact on Foreign Direct Investments (FDI)
The government annulled BITs based on texts framed back in 1993 after receiving adverse judgments in multi-billion dollar investor-state disputes in international courts. To prevent this, the model BIT included “exhaustion of local remedies” as a clause which in effect emphasized state rights over investor rights. However, the number of BITs India signed after 2016 declined. Economists said that it also has impacted the pace of foreign direct investments.
Indian Investments in the Philippines
Indian investment in the Philippines is mainly in the areas of textiles, garments, IT&ITes, steel, Airports, chemicals, Automobiles and pharmaceuticals. Major investors include firms like GMR, which won a bid in 2014 to upgrade and run the Cebu-Mactan airport project. Tata Motors and Mahindra are present in the automobile sector while Wipro, TCS and L&T Infotech, along with others, are present in the BPO sector. Indian pharma firms like Dabur Pharma, Lupin and Torrent among others maintain a presence in the Philippines.
Constraints to Indian Investments
A constraint to Indian investments, the persons cited above say, is the fact that the Philippines remains fairly isolated from many lucrative global supply chains.
Impact of BITs on FDI Inflows into India
An Icrier working paper on the impact of BITs on FDI Inflows into India observed that the government has on many occasions voiced complete antipathy to any multilateral governance of international investment. “Instead the faith seems to reside in soliciting foreign investment, supported by indices such as an escalation in the ease of business ranking. However, mere improvement in this kind of ranking may not be sufficient to encourage substantive foreign direct investment.”
Ease of Doing Business in India
According to a World Bank ‘Ease of Doing Business 2020’ report, India ranked 163 out of 190 countries in ease of enforcing contracts, and takes 1,445 days and 31% of the claim value for dispute resolution. Experts said that the delay hurts investor confidence and impacts FDI inflows.
Importance of Investor Protection
The Icrier report added, “The collective presence of an overall investor protection is positively and significantly linked to foreign investment flows.”
Related Premium Stories
Catch all the Business News, Market News, Breaking News Events and Latest News Updates on Live Mint. Download The Mint News App to get Daily Market Updates.
Updated: 27 Sep 2023, 10:15 PM IST
SDGs, Targets, and Indicators Analysis
1. Which SDGs are addressed or connected to the issues highlighted in the article?
- SDG 8: Decent Work and Economic Growth
- SDG 9: Industry, Innovation, and Infrastructure
- SDG 16: Peace, Justice, and Strong Institutions
The article discusses the renegotiation of investment agreements between India and the Philippines, which is related to economic growth (SDG 8) and the development of industry and infrastructure (SDG 9). It also mentions adverse judgments in investor-state disputes, highlighting the need for strong institutions and justice (SDG 16).
2. What specific targets under those SDGs can be identified based on the article’s content?
- Target 8.2: Achieve higher levels of economic productivity through diversification, technological upgrading, and innovation.
- Target 9.1: Develop quality, reliable, sustainable, and resilient infrastructure.
- Target 16.3: Promote the rule of law at the national and international levels and ensure equal access to justice for all.
The article highlights the need for a new investment agreement that provides stronger investment protection (Target 8.2). It also mentions the development of infrastructure projects in the Philippines, such as airport upgrades (Target 9.1). Additionally, it refers to adverse judgments in investor-state disputes, emphasizing the importance of equal access to justice (Target 16.3).
3. Are there any indicators mentioned or implied in the article that can be used to measure progress towards the identified targets?
- Indicator for Target 8.2: Foreign direct investment (FDI) inflows and the number of investment agreements signed.
- Indicator for Target 9.1: Number of infrastructure projects completed and their sustainability.
- Indicator for Target 16.3: Number of investor-state disputes and their resolution time.
The article mentions the impact of investment agreements on FDI inflows, indicating that the number of investment agreements signed can be used as an indicator for Target 8.2. It also refers to infrastructure projects, such as airport upgrades, which can be measured in terms of the number of projects completed and their sustainability, serving as indicators for Target 9.1. Furthermore, the article discusses adverse judgments in investor-state disputes, suggesting that the number of disputes and their resolution time can be used as an indicator for Target 16.3.
4. Table: SDGs, Targets, and Indicators
SDGs | Targets | Indicators |
---|---|---|
SDG 8: Decent Work and Economic Growth | Target 8.2: Achieve higher levels of economic productivity through diversification, technological upgrading, and innovation. | Foreign direct investment (FDI) inflows and the number of investment agreements signed. |
SDG 9: Industry, Innovation, and Infrastructure | Target 9.1: Develop quality, reliable, sustainable, and resilient infrastructure. | Number of infrastructure projects completed and their sustainability. |
SDG 16: Peace, Justice, and Strong Institutions | Target 16.3: Promote the rule of law at the national and international levels and ensure equal access to justice for all. | Number of investor-state disputes and their resolution time. |
Behold! This splendid article springs forth from the wellspring of knowledge, shaped by a wondrous proprietary AI technology that delved into a vast ocean of data, illuminating the path towards the Sustainable Development Goals. Remember that all rights are reserved by SDG Investors LLC, empowering us to champion progress together.
Source: livemint.com
Join us, as fellow seekers of change, on a transformative journey at https://sdgtalks.ai/welcome, where you can become a member and actively contribute to shaping a brighter future.