Readers Write: Immigration, future of the Star Tribune

The Future of the Institution

The Star Tribune

Opinion editor’s note:

Star Tribune Opinion publishes letters from readers online and in print each day. To contribute, click here.

Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

1. No Poverty
2. Zero Hunger
3. Good Health and Well-being
4. Quality Education
5. Gender Equality
6. Clean Water and Sanitation
7. Affordable and Clean Energy
8. Decent Work and Economic Growth
9. Industry, Innovation, and Infrastructure
10. Reduced Inequalities
11. Sustainable Cities and Communities
12. Responsible Consumption and Production
13. Climate Action
14. Life Below Water
15. Life on Land
16. Peace, Justice, and Strong Institutions
17. Partnerships for the Goals

The Future of the Institution

Our hearts sank when we read the letter from our fellow Frontenac resident about immigration in last Sunday’s paper. While there is ample room to debate the wisdom of making Minnesota a sanctuary state for undocumented migrants, we wince at the sweeping claims about non-English-speaking newcomers. Such accusations are not supported by reliable data or by the experiences of many of us who live in Frontenac.

Most discouraging, we worry that such a divisive view sabotages fledgling efforts by local businesses, schools, libraries, houses of worship and recreational areas to welcome immigrants, and strike fear into a lot of good, hardworking folks.

Immigration is a complex global issue that many nations are struggling to regulate. That discussion is urgently necessary. But to exclude people — “illegal or not” — because we see them as not “blending into our way of life” is shortsighted and wrong. There are many ways to lead a good life, and immigrants have a lot to teach us. It’s worth remembering that all of us who are not Native American are here because of immigrants.

For our own parts, we’d like to assure our immigrant neighbors, both new and of long standing, that many of us in this rural area welcome and respect them.

Pamela Miller, Steve Dietz and Janet Malotky, Kerri Houck and Justin Staker, Jeneann and Nathan Oppedahl, Dan and Lynne Staker, and Susan and Wayne Wandmacher, Frontenac, Minn.

Pamela Miller is a retired Star Tribune metro editor.

The Future of the Institution

This is just a comment on the letter from last Sunday about this whole issue of assimilation of “outsiders.” I fully understand the writer’s misgivings. It’s challenging to come up against people you can’t communicate with, whose food smells funny, who live as extended families in these enclaves and who seem standoffish. But I have a different perspective on that. My parents and I came from Norway in 1947 as sponsored (read: legal) immigrants. This was during the influx of displaced persons who were not well received. We settled on “Snus Boulevard” at Cedar-Riverside among the “enclave” of second- and third-generation Scandinavian immigrants. Had we not lived there, life would have been hard for my mother, who spoke no English to start. It was those other immigrants who would interpret the “American way” for us. I recall a number of times my mother was humiliated by the “natives” who belittled her for her poor English and verbal and cultural gaffes. That is why they/we settled in enclaves.

Not many “original” inhabitants helped ease our integration. My little family ultimately did very well thanks in part to that core of people like us who helped us through.

Harald Eriksen, Brooklyn Park

The Future of the Institution

A letter writer last Sunday was a good example of consternation over race and ethnicity. She must not realize that most new immigrants congregate in areas where they are among those who speak their language and maybe share the same religion. That is why we have Little Italys and Chinatowns.

The Hmong community in the Twin Cities is a perfect example of how immigrants can assimilate. That process took time, but today my state representatives are Hmong, and many Hmong youth are successful professionals and valuable members of society. Give new immigrants some time, and they will do the same. There seemed to be an underlying innuendo in the belief that some new immigrants will never be real Americans. I would have liked her to describe what a real American is.

Chuck Justice, Woodbury

The Future of the Institution

I am a very long-term and loyal subscriber to the Star Tribune (print and digital) and would like to comment on CEO and Publisher Steve Grove’s opinion piece from last weekend (“Star Tribune is growing for Minnesota,” Opinion Exchange, March 17). I found it enriching to see the Star Tribune’s movement toward strengthening local news coverage and its focus to expand outstate coverage. I firmly believe that in these days of turmoil, we need expanded local coverage and the philosophy of being inclusive to all who need accurate information! The strength of the Star Tribune is very important to my family as readers of print and digital.

On the subject of digital, I hope your immediate and long-term plans include an upgrade to the digital experience. I find the digital to be frustrating at times and not as easy to use as our major news outlets’ digital platforms. I am encouraged by Grove’s comments that he is directing a good portion of resources toward the digital experience but also encourage him to continue to strengthen the commitment to the physical daily paper.

I hear many complaints about the St. Paul paper on its delivery process but have only very positive reviews of our daily paper delivery. Your staff is doing a fantastic job in trying times (weather, gas prices, etc.), but my delivery drivers are exceptionally diligent at my delivery early in a convenient place in my yard.

Thank

SDGs, Targets, and Indicators

1. Which SDGs are addressed or connected to the issues highlighted in the article?

• SDG 10: Reduced Inequalities
• SDG 16: Peace, Justice, and Strong Institutions
• SDG 17: Partnerships for the Goals

2. What specific targets under those SDGs can be identified based on the article’s content?

• SDG 10.3: Ensure equal opportunity and reduce inequalities of outcome, including by eliminating discriminatory laws, policies, and practices and promoting appropriate legislation, policies, and action in this regard.
• SDG 16.7: Ensure responsive, inclusive, participatory, and representative decision-making at all levels.
• SDG 17.17: Encourage and promote effective public, public-private, and civil society partnerships, building on the experience and resourcing strategies of partnerships.

3. Are there any indicators mentioned or implied in the article that can be used to measure progress towards the identified targets?

• Indicator for SDG 10.3: Number of countries with laws and regulations that guarantee full and equal access to economic resources, as well as basic services, ownership, and control over land and other forms of property.
• Indicator for SDG 16.7: Proportion of population who believe decision-making is inclusive and responsive, by sex, age, disability, and population group.
• No specific indicators mentioned for SDG 17.17, but it can be measured by assessing the number and effectiveness of partnerships formed between public, private, and civil society organizations to address the issues highlighted in the article.

Table: SDGs, Targets, and Indicators

Behold! This splendid article springs forth from the wellspring of knowledge, shaped by a wondrous proprietary AI technology that delved into a vast ocean of data, illuminating the path towards the Sustainable Development Goals. Remember that all rights are reserved by SDG Investors LLC, empowering us to champion progress together.

Source: startribune.com

Join us, as fellow seekers of change, on a transformative journey at https://sdgtalks.ai/welcome, where you can become a member and actively contribute to shaping a brighter future.