UTIA trade expert elected president of SAEA
UTIA trade expert elected president of SAEA EurekAlert
sdgtalks
Andrew Muhammad Elected President of the Southern Agricultural Economics Association
Introduction
Andrew Muhammad, professor and Blasingame Chair of Excellence in Agricultural Policy at the University of Tennessee Institute of Agriculture, has been elected president of the Southern Agricultural Economics Association. The newly elected president will be recognized at the Association’s upcoming annual meeting in Atlanta, Georgia, from February 3-6.
Importance of Leadership Role
Bill Johnson, interim department head for UT’s Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics, expressed excitement for Dr. Muhammad’s important leadership role. He highlighted Dr. Muhammad’s previous experience with SAEA and his global perspective on agriculture as valuable assets for the Association. Johnson emphasized the value that faculty gain from participating in SAEA events and believes that Dr. Muhammad’s scholar practitioner mindset will greatly benefit his new leadership role.
About the Southern Agricultural Economics Association
The Southern Agricultural Economics Association, established in 1968, is dedicated to applying economic theory and real-world data to issues surrounding the food and fiber sector of the economy, including economic development throughout the region. The association publishes research in its Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, published by Cambridge University Press.
Dr. Muhammad’s Perspective
Dr. Muhammad expressed his gratitude for the Southern Agricultural Economics Association, stating that it has been important to his career. He recalled presenting at his first SAEA conference in 1997 as a first-year graduate student. He believes that SAEA continues to be an important association that supports the agricultural and applied economics profession regionally and nationally. Dr. Muhammad looks forward to working with the board to make SAEA even more relevant in the future.
Dr. Muhammad’s Work at the University of Tennessee
Dr. Muhammad joined the UT Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics in 2018. His program focuses on addressing the global needs of the agricultural sector at the national and state level, improving the competitive position of the state and region in global markets, and informing decision making by farmers, agribusinesses, and policy makers on international trade and related policy issues.
Research Focus
Dr. Muhammad’s research primarily focuses on agricultural trade and policy, global competitiveness of U.S. agriculture, effects of trade on developing countries, and global food demand. His research on global food demand has been widely cited and used in economic and global models. Prior to joining the UT Institute of Agriculture, he served in various roles at USDA’s Economic Research Service.
Advisory Roles and Achievements
Dr. Muhammad currently serves on several advisory boards, including the Agricultural Policy Advisory Committee for Trade and USAID’s Board for International Food and Agricultural Development Subcommittee on Systemic Solutions for Climate Change Adaptation and Mitigation in Agricultural, Nutrition, and Food Systems. He is also an advisor with the Socially Disadvantaged Farmers and Ranchers Policy Research Center and serves on the Agricultural and Applied Economics Association board of directors. Dr. Muhammad has received over $6.2 million in funding for teaching and research and has published numerous journal articles and reports on agricultural trade and policy issues.
Educational Background
Dr. Muhammad earned his doctorate in food and resource economics from the University of Florida, a master’s in agricultural economics from the University of Missouri, and a bachelor’s in agribusiness from Southern University.
About the University of Tennessee Institute of Agriculture
The University of Tennessee Institute of Agriculture includes the Herbert College of Agriculture, UT College of Veterinary Medicine, UT AgResearch, and UT Extension. Through its land-grant mission of teaching, research, and outreach, the Institute provides solutions to Tennesseans and beyond.
SDGs, Targets, and Indicators in the Article
1. Which SDGs are addressed or connected to the issues highlighted in the article?
- SDG 2: Zero Hunger
- SDG 8: Decent Work and Economic Growth
- SDG 12: Responsible Consumption and Production
- SDG 17: Partnerships for the Goals
The article discusses issues related to agriculture, economic development, and global trade, which are connected to SDGs 2, 8, 12, and 17.
2. What specific targets under those SDGs can be identified based on the article’s content?
- SDG 2.3: By 2030, double the agricultural productivity and incomes of small-scale food producers, in particular women, indigenous peoples, family farmers, pastoralists, and fishers.
- SDG 8.3: Promote development-oriented policies that support productive activities, decent job creation, entrepreneurship, creativity, and innovation.
- SDG 12.2: By 2030, achieve the sustainable management and efficient use of natural resources.
- SDG 17.16: Enhance the global partnership for sustainable development, complemented by multi-stakeholder partnerships that mobilize and share knowledge, expertise, technology, and financial resources.
The article indirectly addresses these targets by discussing the role of agricultural policy, global competitiveness of agriculture, and international trade in achieving sustainable development goals.
3. Are there any indicators mentioned or implied in the article that can be used to measure progress towards the identified targets?
- Indicator for SDG 2.3: Agricultural productivity and incomes of small-scale food producers.
- Indicator for SDG 8.3: Job creation, entrepreneurship, creativity, and innovation in the agricultural sector.
- Indicator for SDG 12.2: Sustainable management and efficient use of natural resources in agriculture.
- Indicator for SDG 17.16: Multi-stakeholder partnerships, knowledge sharing, expertise, technology, and financial resources mobilization for agricultural development.
The article doesn’t explicitly mention these indicators, but it discusses the importance of agricultural productivity, job creation, sustainable resource management, and partnerships in achieving the goals.
Table: SDGs, Targets, and Indicators
| SDGs | Targets | Indicators |
|---|---|---|
| SDG 2: Zero Hunger | Target 2.3: By 2030, double the agricultural productivity and incomes of small-scale food producers, in particular women, indigenous peoples, family farmers, pastoralists, and fishers. | Agricultural productivity and incomes of small-scale food producers. |
| SDG 8: Decent Work and Economic Growth | Target 8.3: Promote development-oriented policies that support productive activities, decent job creation, entrepreneurship, creativity, and innovation. | Job creation, entrepreneurship, creativity, and innovation in the agricultural sector. |
| SDG 12: Responsible Consumption and Production | Target 12.2: By 2030, achieve the sustainable management and efficient use of natural resources. | Sustainable management and efficient use of natural resources in agriculture. |
| SDG 17: Partnerships for the Goals | Target 17.16: Enhance the global partnership for sustainable development, complemented by multi-stakeholder partnerships that mobilize and share knowledge, expertise, technology, and financial resources. | Multi-stakeholder partnerships, knowledge sharing, expertise, technology, and financial resources mobilization for agricultural development. |
Behold! This splendid article springs forth from the wellspring of knowledge, shaped by a wondrous proprietary AI technology that delved into a vast ocean of data, illuminating the path towards the Sustainable Development Goals. Remember that all rights are reserved by SDG Investors LLC, empowering us to champion progress together.
Source: eurekalert.org
Join us, as fellow seekers of change, on a transformative journey at https://sdgtalks.ai/welcome, where you can become a member and actively contribute to shaping a brighter future.
