It’s time to fundamentally rethink how America pays for health care – statnews.com

Report on Reforming the U.S. Healthcare Reimbursement System in Alignment with Sustainable Development Goals

Executive Summary

The current U.S. healthcare reimbursement system is fundamentally misaligned with modern healthcare needs and key tenets of the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). The system’s emphasis on high-volume, high-cost “cure” interventions over relationship-based “care” undermines progress toward SDG 3 (Good Health and Well-being), exacerbates inequalities contrary to SDG 10 (Reduced Inequalities), and promotes inefficient resource use, conflicting with SDG 12 (Responsible Consumption and Production). This report advocates for a systemic overhaul that revalues and incentivizes cognitive healthcare services. Such a reform would create a more sustainable, equitable, and effective healthcare model that supports decent work for healthcare professionals (SDG 8) and builds stronger, more accountable healthcare institutions (SDG 16).

Analysis of the Current System’s Conflict with Sustainable Development Goals

Systemic Barriers to Achieving SDG 3: Good Health and Well-being

The prevailing fee-for-service model actively discourages the nuanced care required for managing chronic conditions, which are prevalent today. This creates significant obstacles to achieving universal health coverage and well-being.

• Patient Dissatisfaction: Patients experience fragmented care, limited access to physicians, and insufficient consultation time, directly impeding the goal of ensuring healthy lives for all.
• Provider Burnout and Moral Injury: Healthcare professionals, particularly in primary care, face immense pressure to prioritize volume over quality. This leads to burnout and “moral injury”—the distress of being unable to provide appropriate care—which degrades the healthcare workforce, a critical component for a functioning health system under SDG 3.
• Neglect of Geriatric and Cognitive Care: The system’s financial incentives steer medical professionals away from lower-paid but essential cognitive fields like geriatrics, creating care gaps for aging populations and failing to provide comprehensive health services for all ages.

Inefficiencies and Inequalities in Healthcare Delivery

The focus on procedural interventions over preventative and managerial care contributes to systemic failures related to multiple SDGs.

1. Increased Inequality (SDG 10): The model favors expensive, specialized treatments that are not equally accessible. The rise of “concierge” medicine further widens the gap, creating a two-tiered system where quality, relationship-based care is available only to those who can afford it.
2. Irresponsible Resource Allocation (SDG 12): Significant healthcare expenditure is directed toward low-yield, high-cost procedures, particularly at the end of life. This represents an unsustainable pattern of consumption that fails to deliver proportional value in health outcomes.

A Proposed Framework for a Sustainable Healthcare Model

Revaluing Cognitive Services to Advance Health and Equity

A fundamental shift in the healthcare valuation system is required to reward cognitive services—including time spent listening, coordinating, and building therapeutic relationships. This change would directly support several SDGs.

• Promoting SDG 3: By compensating providers adequately for time and cognitive effort, the new model would incentivize comprehensive management of chronic conditions, improve patient-provider communication, and enhance overall health outcomes.
• Fostering Decent Work (SDG 8): Fairly compensating cognitive work would make primary care and fields like geriatrics more attractive, helping to alleviate workforce shortages and ensuring decent work for a wider range of healthcare professionals.
• Reducing Inequalities (SDG 10): An emphasis on accessible primary and cognitive care would ensure that the quality of healthcare is not solely dependent on a patient’s ability to pay for specialized procedures, thereby promoting more equitable health outcomes.

Workforce Development and Institutional Reform

Implementing this new model necessitates a strategic approach to workforce expansion and the re-evaluation of professional roles, aligning with goals for strong institutions and economic growth.

1. Expanding the Healthcare Workforce (SDG 8): The shift to time-intensive cognitive care will require a significant increase in the number of primary care physicians, nurse practitioners, and physician assistants. This presents an opportunity for job creation and promoting full and productive employment.
2. Strengthening Institutions (SDG 16): The reform necessitates redesigning credentialing and care delivery models. This could involve physicians acting as executive managers of care teams while non-physician specialists perform common technical procedures, leading to more efficient, effective, and accountable health systems.

Conclusion: A Call for Systemic Change

The current U.S. healthcare system is unsustainable, inequitable, and ill-suited to contemporary health challenges. A bold reset that prioritizes and properly compensates cognitive, relationship-driven care is essential. While facing opposition from established interests, this transformation is necessary to achieve the interconnected goals of improved health outcomes (SDG 3), reduced inequality (SDG 10), decent work (SDG 8), and responsible resource management (SDG 12). By stimulating dialogue and leveraging American ingenuity, a new system can be developed that enhances care processes, improves outcomes, and lowers costs, creating a healthcare model that is truly sustainable and serves the well-being of all.

Analysis of the Article in Relation to Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

1. Which SDGs are addressed or connected to the issues highlighted in the article?

• SDG 3: Good Health and Well-being
• SDG 8: Decent Work and Economic Growth
• SDG 10: Reduced Inequalities

2. What specific targets under those SDGs can be identified based on the article’s content?

• SDG 3: Good Health and Well-being
  • Target 3.4: Reduce by one-third premature mortality from non-communicable diseases through prevention and treatment and promote mental health and well-being.
  • Target 3.8: Achieve universal health coverage, including financial risk protection, access to quality essential health-care services and access to safe, effective, quality and affordable essential medicines and vaccines for all.
  • Target 3.c: Substantially increase health financing and the recruitment, development, training and retention of the health workforce.
• SDG 8: Decent Work and Economic Growth
  • Target 8.5: Achieve full and productive employment and decent work for all women and men, and equal pay for work of equal value.
  • Target 8.8: Protect labour rights and promote safe and secure working environments for all workers.
• SDG 10: Reduced Inequalities
  • Target 10.2: Empower and promote the social, economic and political inclusion of all, irrespective of age.
  • Target 10.3: Ensure equal opportunity and reduce inequalities of outcome.

3. Are there any indicators mentioned or implied in the article that can be used to measure progress towards the identified targets?

1. SDG 3: Good Health and Well-being
   • For Target 3.4: The article implies that progress can be measured by tracking the management of chronic conditions and the mental well-being of healthcare providers. It states, “it is primarily the old who have chronic conditions,” and a new system would “better manage chronic conditions.” It also highlights that doctors suffer from “moral injury” and are “burned out.” Therefore, implicit indicators would be:
     • Improved health outcomes for patients with chronic, non-communicable diseases.
     • Reduction in rates of physician burnout, moral injury, and early retirement.
   • For Target 3.8: The article discusses issues of “lack of access, fragmented care,” and high costs. It proposes a model that could make healthcare “more accessible, diverse, and affordable.” This suggests that progress could be measured by:
     • Patient satisfaction levels regarding access to and quality of care.
     • Reduction in overall healthcare costs through fewer “expensive, low-yield procedures.”
     • Increased access to primary care providers for the general population.
   • For Target 3.c: The article directly addresses the “shortage of primary care physicians” and the need to “recruit, train, and properly compensate” them and other professionals. This points to clear indicators:
     • The number and density of primary care and geriatric physicians per capita.
     • Compensation levels for cognitive services versus procedural services in healthcare.
     • Retention rates for primary care physicians and other healthcare professionals.
2. SDG 8: Decent Work and Economic Growth
   • For Target 8.5: The article argues for a system that rewards “cognitive care services” and properly compensates primary care physicians, whose work is described as “unsexy, poorly paid, and demanding.” It also frames the new model as a “good job creation program.” Indicators for this target would include:
     • Changes in the pay gap between cognitive-based medical specialties (like primary care) and procedure-based specialties (like dermatology).
     • The number of new jobs created for healthcare professionals like nurse practitioners and physician assistants.
   • For Target 8.8: The article describes the negative work environment for doctors, who are a “slave to the electronic medical record” and suffer from the “frustration of not being able to do the right thing.” This implies that a safer and more secure working environment is needed. An indicator would be:
     • Rates of job satisfaction among physicians and other healthcare workers, measuring factors like professional autonomy and gratification.
3. SDG 10: Reduced Inequalities
   • For Target 10.2: The article highlights that the current system is biased against the elderly, stating that “the soft care model of caring for old people goes against our grain” and that “ageism, is baked into our society.” A new system would better serve this demographic. An indicator would be:
     • Metrics on healthcare access and quality specifically for the elderly population.
   • For Target 10.3: The article points out that the current “concierge” model of relationship-based care is only affordable for a few, creating an inequality of outcome. The proposed system aims to make quality care more universally accessible. Progress could be measured by:
     • Reduction in disparities in health outcomes between different socioeconomic groups.
     • Increased availability of relationship-driven primary care outside of high-cost concierge models.

4. Table of SDGs, Targets, and Indicators

Source: statnews.com