High school football roundup for Nov. 7, 2025: Khalil Taylor’s 4 TDs guide Pine-Richland past Shaler – Trib HSSN

WPIAL Quarterfinal Report: Advancing Community Well-being and Youth Development through Scholastic Athletics

Analysis of Contributions to Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

The Western Pennsylvania Interscholastic Athletic League (WPIAL) quarterfinal football matchups on November 7, 2025, served as a platform for advancing several key United Nations Sustainable Development Goals. These events highlight the role of scholastic sports in promoting youth development, community cohesion, and institutional integrity.

• SDG 3: Good Health and Well-being: The athletic competitions directly support the physical and mental health of student-athletes, encouraging active lifestyles and resilience.
• SDG 4: Quality Education: These programs are integral to the educational experience, teaching discipline, teamwork, and strategic thinking, while also providing pathways to higher education for many participants.
• SDG 10: Reduced Inequalities: School sports offer a structured environment where students from diverse backgrounds can collaborate and achieve common goals, fostering inclusivity and equal opportunity.
• SDG 11: Sustainable Cities and Communities: The games act as significant community gatherings, strengthening local identity and social bonds.
• SDG 16: Peace, Justice, and Strong Institutions: The WPIAL framework, which governs these contests, promotes principles of fair play, sportsmanship, and respect for rules, mirroring the foundations of just and peaceful societies.

Game Summaries and Performance Metrics

Class 5A Quarterfinals: Showcasing Individual Excellence and Team Cohesion

1. Pine-Richland (10-1) vs. Shaler (4-8)
   • Final Score: 42-10
   • Synopsis: Top-seeded Pine-Richland secured a decisive victory, demonstrating a high level of preparation and execution, which are key educational outcomes (SDG 4).
   • Key Contributor Analysis (Pine-Richland):
     • Khalil Taylor’s performance, featuring four touchdowns via kickoff return, pass reception, interception return, and punt return, exemplifies the multifaceted skill development encouraged in quality youth programs.
     • Aaron Strader contributed 107 passing yards and three touchdowns.
   • Key Contributor Analysis (Shaler):
     • Aaron Aversa showcased resilience with 115 passing yards and 122 rushing yards, including one touchdown.
   • Next Matchup: Pine-Richland will face Moon in the semifinals, continuing its pursuit of institutional excellence.
2. Peters Township (11-0) vs. Bethel Park (7-5)
   • Final Score: 42-14
   • Synopsis: No. 2 Peters Township maintained its undefeated record, a testament to the team’s consistent focus on health and well-being (SDG 3).
   • Key Contributor Analysis (Peters Township):
     • Cole Neupaver was instrumental, with 135 rushing yards and four touchdowns, plus a receiving touchdown.
     • Nolan DiLucia added 124 passing yards and a rushing touchdown.
   • Key Contributor Analysis (Bethel Park):
     • Evan Devine recorded 185 passing yards and a touchdown.
   • Next Matchup: Peters Township advances to play Upper St. Clair in the semifinals.

Class 3A Quarterfinals: Promoting Community Engagement

1. Imani Christian (11-0) vs. Hopewell (7-5)
   • Final Score: 59-21
   • Synopsis: Imani Christian’s dominant ground game, accumulating 497 rushing yards, highlighted a strategic approach that contributes to the educational value of the sport (SDG 4). The event brought together supporters from both communities, reinforcing social ties (SDG 11).
   • Key Contributor Analysis (Imani Christian):
     • Gabe Jenkins: 184 rushing yards, two touchdowns.
     • David Davis: 170 rushing yards, two touchdowns.
   • Key Contributor Analysis (Hopewell):
     • James Armstrong: 104 passing yards, one touchdown.
   • Next Matchup: Imani Christian will compete against Central Valley.

Class 2A Quarterfinals: Upholding Fair Play and Institutional Integrity

1. Seton LaSalle (10-1) vs. Mohawk (6-6)
   • Final Score: 42-7
   • Synopsis: No. 1 Seton LaSalle delivered an efficient and disciplined performance, reflecting the positive governance of strong athletic institutions (SDG 16).
   • Key Contributor Analysis (Seton LaSalle):
     • Kia Jones: Perfect 7-for-7 passing for 148 yards and two touchdowns.
     • Kymarr Freeman: 152 rushing yards and two touchdowns.
     • Aaron Loritts: Two receptions for 109 yards and two touchdowns.
   • Next Matchup: Seton LaSalle proceeds to the semifinals against Washington.
2. Steel Valley (8-3) vs. Ellwood City (7-5)
   • Final Score: 42-6
   • Synopsis: Steel Valley’s victory was powered by a remarkable individual effort, underscoring how sports can provide a platform for youth to excel and build well-being (SDG 3).
   • Key Contributor Analysis (Steel Valley):
     • Da’Ron Barksdale: 213 rushing yards and five touchdowns.
   • Key Contributor Analysis (Ellwood City):
     • Tyler Smiley: 103 passing yards.
   • Next Matchup: Steel Valley will face Western Beaver.

Class A Quarterfinals: Fostering Inclusivity and Opportunity

1. Bishop Canevin (9-3) vs. Frazier (7-5)
   • Final Score: 50-7
   • Synopsis: This contest provided a valuable opportunity for student-athletes from different communities to compete, contributing to the goal of reducing inequalities through shared experience (SDG 10).
   • Key Contributor Analysis (Bishop Canevin):
     • Myontae Mott: 160 rushing yards, two touchdowns.
     • Damar Olds: Contributed touchdowns via passing, rushing, and an interception return.
   • Key Contributor Analysis (Frazier):
     • Derek Diamond: 122 rushing yards and one touchdown.
   • Next Matchup: Bishop Canevin advances to play Clairton.
2. Fort Cherry (12-0) vs. Neshannock (8-4)
   • Final Score: 36-9
   • Synopsis: Top-seeded Fort Cherry continued its successful season, a result of sustained effort that provides a quality educational and developmental experience for its students (SDG 4).
   • Key Contributor Analysis (Fort Cherry):
     • Eli Salvini: 206 rushing yards, two touchdowns.
     • Matt Sieg: 131 rushing yards, two touchdowns.
   • Next Matchup: Fort Cherry will face Laurel in the semifinals.
3. Laurel (11-1) vs. Chartiers-Houston (8-4)
   • Final Score: 40-21
   • Synopsis: Laurel’s balanced offensive and defensive effort led to a significant win, demonstrating the value of teamwork and collective responsibility.
   • Key Contributor Analysis (Laurel):
     • Kolton Carlson: 116 rushing yards, two touchdowns.
     • Jack Miles: 77 rushing yards, two touchdowns.
     • Tony Geiwitz: Two interceptions, highlighting defensive strength.
   • Key Contributor Analysis (Chartiers-Houston):
     • Aaron Walsh: 177 passing yards and three touchdowns.
   • Next Matchup: Laurel advances to play Fort Cherry.

Analysis of Sustainable Development Goals in the Article

1. Which SDGs are addressed or connected to the issues highlighted in the article?

Upon thorough analysis of the provided article, it has been determined that there are no Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) addressed or connected to the issues discussed. The reasons are as follows:

• The article is a sports news report focused exclusively on the results of WPIAL high school football games.
• The content is limited to game scores, team records, player names, and individual statistics such as touchdowns, passing yards, and rushing yards.
• The text does not contain any information or discussion related to the broader social, economic, or environmental themes that form the basis of the 17 SDGs, such as poverty, hunger, health and well-being, education quality, gender equality, or climate action.

2. What specific targets under those SDGs can be identified based on the article’s content?

Since no SDGs are addressed in the article, no specific SDG targets can be identified.

• SDG targets are concrete objectives set to achieve the broader goals (e.g., Target 4.1: “By 2030, ensure that all girls and boys complete free, equitable and quality primary and secondary education…”).
• The article’s content, which details athletic achievements like “Khalil Taylor scored four touchdowns” and “Cole Neupaver ran for 135 yards,” does not align with or provide any information about progress towards any of the 169 official SDG targets.

3. Are there any indicators mentioned or implied in the article that can be used to measure progress towards the identified targets?

The article does not mention or imply any indicators that can be used to measure progress towards SDG targets.

• SDG indicators are specific, measurable data points used to track progress on targets (e.g., “Proportion of children and young people achieving a minimum proficiency level in reading and mathematics”).
• The numerical data presented in the article, such as scores (42-10), player statistics (213 yards), and team records (11-0), are purely sports-related metrics. They have no relevance to the established global indicator framework for the SDGs and cannot be used to measure progress in areas like public health, education access, or institutional strength.

Summary Table

4. SDGs, Targets, and Indicators Table

Source: tribhssn.triblive.com