School Safety and Traffic – Workshop on Nov. 13 – Culver City Crossroads

Report on the Tri-School Area Mobility and Safety Initiative

1.0 Introduction and Project Scope

The City of Culver City has initiated a study to enhance traffic circulation and public safety within the Tri-School Area. This initiative directly addresses the need for sustainable urban development by focusing on a critical community hub. The project’s scope encompasses the immediate vicinity of three key educational institutions:

• Farragut Elementary School
• Culver City Middle School
• Culver High School

The initial phase involves a community engagement workshop designed to gather empirical data and qualitative feedback from residents, students, families, and local commuters. This participatory approach is fundamental to developing solutions that are both effective and equitable.

2.0 Alignment with Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

This mobility and safety project is strategically aligned with several United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), reflecting a commitment to creating a healthier, more sustainable, and inclusive community.

1. SDG 3: Good Health and Well-being: By aiming to improve road safety, the project directly contributes to Target 3.6, which seeks to halve the number of global deaths and injuries from road traffic accidents. Promoting safer routes encourages walking and cycling, fostering physical activity and well-being.
2. SDG 4: Quality Education: Ensuring safe and accessible passage to schools is a prerequisite for equitable education. This initiative supports SDG 4 by creating a secure environment that facilitates consistent student attendance and access to learning opportunities.
3. SDG 11: Sustainable Cities and Communities: The project is a core component of achieving SDG 11. It focuses on Target 11.2, which calls for providing access to safe, affordable, and sustainable transport systems for all. The workshop itself embodies the principles of inclusive and participatory urban planning (Target 11.3).
4. SDG 13: Climate Action: By improving traffic flow and creating infrastructure that supports active transport (walking and cycling), the initiative aims to reduce vehicle emissions and local carbon footprint, contributing to climate action.

3.0 Community Engagement Workshop Details

To ensure the project’s success and its alignment with community needs and SDG principles of inclusive institutions (SDG 16), a public workshop has been scheduled. The objective is to collect firsthand accounts of mobility and safety challenges in the Tri-School Area.

• Date: Thursday, November 13, 2025
• Time: 6:30 PM to 8:00 PM
• Venue: Farragut Elementary Cafetorium, 10820 Farragut Drive

4.0 Objectives and Further Information

The primary objectives of the Tri-School Area Mobility Study are to develop data-driven strategies that will:

1. Enhance the physical safety of all individuals traveling within the designated area, directly supporting SDG 3 and SDG 11.
2. Improve traffic circulation to reduce congestion and its associated environmental impacts, contributing to SDG 11 and SDG 13.
3. Foster a community-centric planning process that ensures outcomes are sustainable and widely supported.

Comprehensive details regarding the project’s direction and long-term goals are available on the Tri-School Area Mobility Study Project website.

Analysis of Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) in the Article

1. Which SDGs are addressed or connected to the issues highlighted in the article?

The article on the School Safety and Traffic Workshop in Culver City’s Tri-School Area connects to several Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) by focusing on community well-being, safe infrastructure, and participatory planning.

• SDG 3: Good Health and Well-being: The primary goal of the workshop is to improve “safety” related to traffic. This directly addresses the need to prevent injuries and fatalities from road accidents, promoting the physical well-being of students, families, and residents.
• SDG 11: Sustainable Cities and Communities: The article discusses a “Tri-School Area Mobility Study” aimed at improving “circulation and safety.” This aligns with the goal of making urban areas safe, inclusive, and sustainable by focusing on safe and accessible transport systems and participatory urban planning.
• SDG 4: Quality Education: While not about curriculum, the initiative ensures a safe environment for learning. Safe travel to and from school is a fundamental component of providing accessible and inclusive education, as unsafe conditions can be a barrier to school attendance.

2. What specific targets under those SDGs can be identified based on the article’s content?

The article’s focus on traffic safety and mobility planning for a school district points to several specific SDG targets.

1. Target 3.6: By 2020, halve the number of global deaths and injuries from road traffic accidents. Although the 2020 deadline has passed, the spirit of this target continues. The workshop’s explicit purpose of improving “safety” in an area with high pedestrian traffic from students directly contributes to the goal of reducing road traffic injuries.
2. Target 11.2: By 2030, provide access to safe, affordable, accessible and sustainable transport systems for all, improving road safety… with special attention to the needs of those in vulnerable situations, including… children. The “Tri-School Area Mobility Study” is a direct effort to improve road safety and transportation systems for a vulnerable population—school children.
3. Target 11.3: By 2030, enhance inclusive and sustainable urbanization and capacity for participatory, integrated and sustainable human settlement planning and management in all countries. The city is hosting a “workshop to learn about the experiences of residents, students, families,” which is a clear example of a participatory planning process aimed at creating sustainable and safe community infrastructure.
4. Target 4.a: Build and upgrade education facilities that are child, disability and gender sensitive and provide safe, non-violent, inclusive and effective learning environments for all. A safe journey to school is an extension of a safe learning environment. By addressing traffic dangers around schools, the community is working to ensure the overall environment is safe and conducive to education.

3. Are there any indicators mentioned or implied in the article that can be used to measure progress towards the identified targets?

The article, being an announcement, does not provide quantitative data but implies several qualitative and quantitative indicators that could be used to measure progress.

• Implied Indicator for Target 3.6: The number of traffic-related incidents, injuries, or near-misses involving students and residents in the Tri-School Area. A key measure of the project’s success would be a reduction in these figures over time.
• Implied Indicator for Target 11.2: The community’s perception of safety. The workshop is designed to gather baseline data on the “experiences of residents, students, [and] families.” Follow-up surveys could measure changes in perceived safety and ease of “circulation” for pedestrians, cyclists, and drivers.
• Implied Indicator for Target 11.3: The level of community participation in the planning process. The number of attendees at the workshop and the diversity of stakeholders (residents, students, families) who provide input serve as an indicator of participatory planning in action. The existence of the “Tri-School Area Mobility Study Project website” also indicates a commitment to transparent and inclusive management.

SDGs, Targets, and Indicators Table

Source: culvercitycrossroads.com