Governor Newsom supports workers as Trump’s shutdown hurts the economy – California State Portal | CA.gov

Report on the Modernization of California’s Unemployment Benefits Program and its Alignment with Sustainable Development Goals

Introduction: Strengthening Social Safety Nets

On October 20, 2025, the State of California announced a significant modernization of its unemployment benefits program. This initiative aims to provide more accessible and efficient support to workers affected by economic instability, directly addressing several United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). The program’s launch occurs amidst federal economic disruptions that pose challenges to sustainable development, particularly concerning poverty, economic growth, and public well-being.

State-Level Initiatives for Sustainable and Inclusive Growth

Program Modernization: Advancing SDG 16 (Peace, Justice, and Strong Institutions)

California’s Employment Development Department (EDD) has launched the EDDNext initiative to build a more effective, accountable, and inclusive institution. This effort focuses on enhancing the myEDD online portal to better serve residents, thereby strengthening the state’s social protection infrastructure.

• Customer-Centered Improvements: The modernization prioritizes user experience to ensure that public services are responsive to the needs of the population.
• New Weekly Wage Reporting Tool: A key feature of the update is a tool designed to simplify the process of reporting wages. This innovation promotes accuracy and efficiency, contributing to several SDGs:
  • SDG 1 (No Poverty): By ensuring accurate and timely benefit payments, the tool helps maintain a crucial financial safety net for unemployed individuals and their families.
  • SDG 8 (Decent Work and Economic Growth): An efficient unemployment system is a cornerstone of a stable labor market, providing essential support during periods of job transition.
  • SDG 10 (Reduced Inequalities): Making the benefits system easier to navigate helps ensure equitable access for all individuals, regardless of their familiarity with complex administrative processes.
• Future Enhancements: Further improvements to the online certification process are planned for 2026, demonstrating a continued commitment to institutional improvement and service delivery.

Analysis of Economic Stressors and Their Impact on SDGs

Challenges to Economic Stability and Data Integrity

The state’s initiative is set against a backdrop of national economic challenges, including a federal government shutdown. This situation directly impedes progress on multiple SDGs by creating uncertainty and disrupting essential services.

Impact on Key Sustainable Development Goals

The prevailing economic conditions present significant threats to the well-being of residents and the achievement of sustainable development targets. The following impacts have been noted:

1. SDG 8 (Decent Work and Economic Growth): The shutdown has led to employment instability for federal workers and a reported decrease in national hiring rates. Furthermore, the suspension of federal statistical activities, including the release of labor market data by the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS), undermines the ability of policymakers and businesses to make informed decisions, hindering efforts to promote sustained and inclusive economic growth.
2. SDG 1 (No Poverty) & SDG 10 (Reduced Inequalities): A rising cost of living, with reports of significant monthly cost increases for households, threatens to push more families into poverty and exacerbate income inequality.
3. SDG 11 (Sustainable Cities and Communities): The national housing market has reached historically unaffordable levels, creating barriers to safe and secure housing, a fundamental component of sustainable communities.
4. SDG 3 (Good Health and Well-being): Increases in health insurance costs are creating financial burdens and threatening access to essential healthcare services for many individuals and families across the country.

Conclusion: California’s Commitment to the SDG Framework

In response to national economic challenges, California is reinforcing its commitment to the Sustainable Development Goals through tangible actions. By modernizing its unemployment benefits system, the state is strengthening its social protection mechanisms to mitigate poverty (SDG 1), support decent work (SDG 8), reduce inequality (SDG 10), and build strong, effective institutions (SDG 16). This proactive approach demonstrates a localized strategy to uphold principles of sustainable and equitable development, ensuring support for residents during times of economic uncertainty.

Analysis of Sustainable Development Goals in the Article

1. Which SDGs are addressed or connected to the issues highlighted in the article?

The article highlights several socio-economic challenges and governmental responses that connect to multiple Sustainable Development Goals. The primary themes of unemployment, social safety nets, economic instability, and access to basic services directly align with the following SDGs:

• SDG 1: No Poverty – The article focuses on providing unemployment benefits, a key social protection system aimed at preventing individuals and families from falling into poverty during periods of job loss.
• SDG 3: Good Health and Well-being – The text explicitly mentions the rising costs of healthcare and loss of insurance coverage as a major issue affecting American families.
• SDG 8: Decent Work and Economic Growth – The core of the article revolves around the impacts of a government shutdown on workers, job losses, a decrease in hiring, and the overall national economy.
• SDG 11: Sustainable Cities and Communities – The issue of housing affordability is directly addressed, with the article stating that the housing market has reached its “most unaffordable level in history.”
• SDG 16: Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions – The article discusses both the failure of federal institutions (shutdown, inability to produce data) and the efforts of a state institution (California’s EDD) to become more effective, transparent, and responsive to citizens’ needs.

2. What specific targets under those SDGs can be identified based on the article’s content?

Based on the specific issues discussed, the following targets can be identified:

1. Target 1.3: Implement nationally appropriate social protection systems and measures for all.
   • Explanation: The article’s main subject is California’s effort to modernize its unemployment benefits program. This program is a critical social protection system designed to support workers who have lost their income. The launch of the new system to make accessing benefits “faster and easier” is a direct action toward implementing and improving this target.
2. Target 8.5: By 2030, achieve full and productive employment and decent work for all women and men.
   • Explanation: The article describes a situation contrary to this target, mentioning “Massive job losses” and a “sharp decrease in hiring.” The government’s actions are a response to the failure to maintain stable employment, making this target highly relevant to the problems described.
3. Target 3.8: Achieve universal health coverage, including financial risk protection, access to quality essential health-care services and access to safe, effective, quality and affordable essential medicines and vaccines for all.
   • Explanation: This target is identified through the article’s mention of negative trends, such as “More expensive health care and lost coverage” and Californians seeing their “monthly health insurance bills nearly double.” This highlights a regression from the goal of affordable and universal health coverage.
4. Target 11.1: By 2030, ensure access for all to adequate, safe and affordable housing.
   • Explanation: The article directly connects to this target by stating, “Under the Trump administration, the U.S. Housing market has reached its most unaffordable level in history.” It also mentions attempts to “block funding for homelessness programs,” which further undermines progress toward this target.
5. Target 16.6: Develop effective, accountable and transparent institutions at all levels.
   • Explanation: California’s initiative, “EDDNext,” is an effort to “modernize the Employment Development Department (EDD)” and make state government “work better for Californians.” This initiative, including the new Wage Tool, is a clear example of developing more effective and “customer-centered” institutions. Conversely, the federal shutdown described in the article represents a failure of institutional effectiveness.

3. Are there any indicators mentioned or implied in the article that can be used to measure progress towards the identified targets?

The article mentions or implies several qualitative and quantitative indicators that can be used to measure progress:

• Indicator for Target 1.3 (Social Protection): The primary indicator is the accessibility and efficiency of the unemployment benefits program. The article implies metrics such as the speed of payment (“get paid faster”) and ease of use (“easier for customers… to report required wages”). The launch of the “new, upgraded, and modernized unemployment benefits program” itself serves as an indicator of investment in social protection systems.
• Indicator for Target 8.5 (Employment): The article explicitly points to the unemployment rate and job creation numbers as key indicators. It highlights their importance by noting that the “California Department of Labor and Workforce Development was unable to release monthly job numbers for the state as a result of the delayed federal numbers.” The phrases “massive job losses” and “sharp decrease in hiring” are qualitative descriptions of these indicators.
• Indicator for Target 3.8 (Health Coverage): A direct indicator mentioned is the cost of health insurance premiums. The article states that monthly bills will “nearly double beginning in January — and in some cases more than triple.” This serves as a measure of financial risk and affordability of healthcare.
• Indicator for Target 11.1 (Affordable Housing): The article implies an indicator related to the housing affordability index or house-price-to-income ratio by stating the market has reached its “most unaffordable level in history.” The level of funding for homelessness programs is another implied indicator of commitment to this target.
• Indicator for Target 16.6 (Effective Institutions): The availability of essential government data is a key indicator. The article notes that “many federal statistical activities have been suspended during the shutdown,” preventing the release of employment reports. This demonstrates a breakdown in institutional effectiveness. On the state level, the development and implementation of tools like the “Weekly Wage Reporting Tool” is an indicator of institutional improvement and responsiveness.

4. SDGs, Targets, and Indicators Table

Source: gov.ca.gov