Incident Report: Manchester Synagogue Attack and Sustainable Development Goal Implications

Executive Summary

This report details a fatal attack at a synagogue in Manchester, England, with a specific focus on its relationship to the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). A preliminary police investigation has indicated that one deceased victim and one injured victim were likely shot by armed officers responding to the incident. This event directly challenges the progress of several key SDGs, most notably SDG 16 (Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions), SDG 3 (Good Health and Well-being), and SDG 11 (Sustainable Cities and Communities).

Incident Overview

An attack on a synagogue in Manchester resulted in multiple casualties. Subsequent findings from the police investigation suggest a complex and tragic development:

1. Victim Casualties: One individual was killed and another injured during the incident.
2. Probable Cause: Police have stated a belief that both casualties were struck by shots fired by armed officers who were aiming for the attacker.
3. Victim Actions: The two victims were reportedly positioned behind a door, attempting to prevent the assailant’s entry at the time they were shot.

Analysis in Relation to SDG 16: Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions

The incident represents a significant setback for the objectives outlined in SDG 16, which aims to promote peaceful and inclusive societies and build effective, accountable institutions.

• Target 16.1 (Reduce Violence): The attack is a direct contravention of the goal to significantly reduce all forms of violence and related death rates everywhere.
• Target 16.3 (Promote Rule of Law and Access to Justice): The ongoing investigation into the actions of the responding officers is a critical test of the justice system’s ability to ensure accountability and provide access to justice for the victims and their families.
• Target 16.6 (Develop Effective, Accountable Institutions): The police force’s disclosure of the potential friendly-fire incident is a necessary step toward institutional transparency. The outcome of the investigation will be crucial for public trust and demonstrating the effectiveness and accountability of law enforcement institutions.

Impact on SDG 3: Good Health and Well-being

The attack has severe consequences for the health and well-being of the affected community, undermining the core principles of SDG 3.

• Target 3.4 (Promote Mental Health): Such violent events inflict deep and lasting psychological trauma on survivors, families, and the wider community, posing a major challenge to the promotion of mental health and well-being.
• Premature Mortality: The death of a victim constitutes a failure to prevent premature mortality and protect human life.

Implications for SDG 11: Sustainable Cities and Communities

The safety and inclusivity of urban spaces, a key objective of SDG 11, are directly threatened by such acts of violence.

• Target 11.7 (Provide Access to Safe Public Spaces): An attack on a place of worship erodes the sense of security in community spaces, undermining the goal of ensuring universal access to safe and inclusive environments for all citizens.
• Community Resilience: The incident tests the resilience of the urban community and its institutions. A just and transparent response is essential for rebuilding trust and reinforcing the social fabric required for a sustainable and peaceful community.

1. Which SDGs are addressed or connected to the issues highlighted in the article?

   The article, which details a violent attack at a synagogue resulting in death and injury, directly connects to the following Sustainable Development Goals:

   • SDG 16: Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions

     This goal is central to the article’s content. The incident described is a fundamental breach of peace and security. It involves violence, death, and the response of a state institution (the police), highlighting issues of public safety and justice.

   • SDG 11: Sustainable Cities and Communities

     This goal is relevant because the attack took place in a synagogue, a key community space. The safety and inclusivity of public and community spaces are critical components of sustainable cities, and this event directly undermines that sense of safety.

2. What specific targets under those SDGs can be identified based on the article’s content?

   Based on the issues of violence, death, and safety in a community space, the following specific targets can be identified:

   • Target 16.1: Significantly reduce all forms of violence and related death rates everywhere.

     The article explicitly describes a violent attack that resulted in one person’s death and another’s injury. This directly relates to the goal of reducing violence and its fatal consequences.

   • Target 11.7: By 2030, provide universal access to safe, inclusive and accessible, green and public spaces…

     A synagogue is a public gathering space for a specific community. The violent attack described in the article transforms this location from a safe space into a site of violence, directly challenging the objective of ensuring safety in such places.

3. Are there any indicators mentioned or implied in the article that can be used to measure progress towards the identified targets?

   The article provides information that can be used as data points for specific SDG indicators, either directly or by implication:

   • Indicator 16.1.1: Number of victims of intentional homicide per 100,000 population…

     The article’s statement that “One of the victims who died” provides a direct data point for this indicator, contributing to the count of intentional homicides.

   • Indicator 16.1.3: Proportion of population subjected to (a) physical… violence in the previous 12 months.

     The two victims, one who died and one who was injured from being shot, were subjected to extreme physical violence. Their cases would be counted in measurements for this indicator.

   • Indicator 11.7.2: Proportion of persons victim of physical or sexual harassment, by… place of occurrence, in the previous 12 months.

     This indicator is relevant as it tracks violence by location. The article specifies the “place of occurrence” as a “synagogue in the northern English city,” allowing for the tracking of violence in public or community spaces.

4. Create a table with three columns titled ‘SDGs, Targets and Indicators” to present the findings from analyzing the article.

   SDGs	Targets	Indicators
   SDG 16: Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions	16.1: Significantly reduce all forms of violence and related death rates everywhere.	16.1.1: Number of victims of intentional homicide (The article reports one death). 16.1.3: Proportion of population subjected to physical violence (The article identifies two victims of shooting).
   SDG 11: Sustainable Cities and Communities	11.7: Provide universal access to safe, inclusive and accessible… public spaces.	11.7.2: Proportion of persons victim of physical harassment, by place of occurrence (The article specifies the attack occurred in a synagogue, a community space).

Source: cnn.com