Black Hawk Co. Supervisor charged with sexual abuse – KCRG

Report on Legal Proceedings Against a Public Official in Relation to Sustainable Development Goals

Incident Summary

• Subject: Christopher Schwartz, 45, a supervisor with Black Hawk County.
• Charges: Two counts of third-degree sexual abuse.
• Arrest: The subject was arrested by the Iowa Division of Criminal Investigation at his residence in Waterloo.
• Case Details: Court documents indicate two alleged instances of sexual assault occurred in August 2023. One allegation includes the photographing of an apparently incapacitated victim.
• Judicial Process: The Iowa Attorney General’s Office is managing the prosecution to prevent any conflict of interest, and the subject is being held on a $50,000 bond.

Implications for Sustainable Development Goal 16: Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions

This case directly addresses the core tenets of SDG 16, which is dedicated to building effective, accountable, and inclusive institutions and ensuring access to justice for all.

1. Promoting the Rule of Law (Target 16.3): The arrest and formal charges against an elected official reinforce the principle that all individuals are subject to the rule of law, which is fundamental for a just society.
2. Developing Accountable Institutions (Target 16.6): The legal action demonstrates a commitment to accountability. The decision to have the State Attorney General’s Office handle the case highlights a procedural safeguard designed to maintain institutional transparency and integrity by avoiding conflicts of interest at the local level.
3. Reducing Violence (Target 16.1): The prosecution of sexual abuse allegations is a critical action in fulfilling the global commitment to significantly reduce all forms of violence.

Relevance to Sustainable Development Goal 5: Gender Equality

The charges are profoundly relevant to SDG 5, which aims to achieve gender equality and eliminate all forms of violence against women and girls.

• Eliminating Violence (Target 5.2): This goal explicitly calls for the elimination of all forms of violence, including sexual abuse and exploitation, in both public and private spheres. Prosecuting such alleged crimes is a direct mechanism for advancing this target.
• Upholding Justice for Victims: Ensuring that individuals in positions of public trust are held accountable for alleged acts of sexual violence is essential to creating a safe environment and upholding the rights and dignity of all persons, a cornerstone of gender equality.

Analysis of Sustainable Development Goals in the Article

1. Relevant Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

1. SDG 5: Gender Equality
   • The article discusses “sexual abuse” and “sexual assaults,” which are forms of gender-based violence. SDG 5 aims to achieve gender equality and empower all women and girls, with a specific focus on eliminating all forms of violence against them. Although the victim’s gender is not specified, sexual violence is a key issue addressed under this goal.
2. SDG 16: Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
   • This goal is highly relevant as the article covers themes of violence, justice, and the accountability of public institutions. It details a criminal charge against a public official (“board supervisor”), the legal process (arrest, charges), and measures to ensure institutional integrity (“The Iowa Attorney General’s Office is handling the case to avoid conflict of interest”).

2. Specific SDG Targets Identified

1. Target 5.2: Eliminate all forms of violence against all women and girls in the public and private spheres…
   • The charge of “third degree sexual abuse” directly relates to this target’s aim of eliminating sexual violence. The article highlights a specific case that falls under the umbrella of violence this target seeks to eradicate.
2. Target 16.1: Significantly reduce all forms of violence and related death rates everywhere.
   • The “two instances of sexual assaults” mentioned in the court records are a direct example of the violence that this target aims to reduce. The legal action taken against the alleged perpetrator is a mechanism for addressing and deterring such violence.
3. Target 16.3: Promote the rule of law at the national and international levels and ensure equal access to justice for all.
   • The article demonstrates this target in action. The arrest of Christopher Schwartz by the Iowa Division of Criminal Investigation, the formal charges, and the case being handled by the state’s Attorney General all exemplify the promotion of the rule of law and the process of providing access to justice for the victim.
4. Target 16.6: Develop effective, accountable and transparent institutions at all levels.
   • The subject of the investigation is a public official (“A board supervisor with Black Hawk County”). Holding him accountable through the justice system is a direct reflection of this target. Furthermore, the decision for the “Iowa Attorney General’s Office” to handle the case specifically “to avoid conflict of interest” is a clear measure to ensure the institution operates in an accountable and transparent manner.

3. Indicators for Measuring Progress

1. Indicators for Violence (Targets 5.2 & 16.1)
   • The article provides a specific data point that could be used for indicators measuring the prevalence of sexual violence (such as Indicator 16.1.3: Proportion of population subjected to physical, psychological or sexual violence). The text explicitly states “two instances of third degree sexual abuse,” which serves as a direct, albeit small-scale, measure of reported violence.
2. Indicators for Justice (Target 16.3)
   • The legal process described implies progress toward Indicator 16.3.1 (Proportion of victims of violence… who reported their victimization to competent authorities). The existence of an arrest and court records confirms that the incident was reported and is being processed by the justice system, indicating that mechanisms for justice are accessible and functioning.
3. Indicators for Institutional Accountability (Target 16.6)
   • While not a quantitative metric, the article provides a qualitative indicator of institutional accountability. The action of removing the case from local jurisdiction “to avoid conflict of interest” is a tangible example of a procedure designed to maintain the integrity, accountability, and transparency of public and judicial institutions, especially when a public official is involved.

Summary Table of SDGs, Targets, and Indicators

Source: kcrg.com