Sponsor spotlight: Ageism is one of the last socially acceptable prejudices – MLTnews.com

Report on Ageism and its Contradiction to Sustainable Development Goals

Introduction: Reframing Aging in the Context of Global Goals

A paradigm shift from an “anti-aging” to a “pro-aging” philosophy is essential for aligning societal values with global development objectives. The prevailing narrative often treats aging as a pathology to be managed rather than a natural life stage of opportunity and strength. This perspective directly conflicts with the principles of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), which advocate for the well-being and inclusion of all people at all ages.

The Global Impact of Ageism on Health and Well-being (SDG 3)

Ageism poses a significant threat to achieving SDG 3: Good Health and Well-being. The World Health Organization (WHO) reports that ageist attitudes are held by approximately half of the global population, leading to demonstrably poorer health outcomes for older persons. The WHO identifies three primary pathways through which ageism influences health:

• Psychological: Negative stereotypes surrounding age can exacerbate stress and diminish an individual’s sense of self-worth.
• Behavioral: Internalized ageism can lead to poor health behaviors, including noncompliance with prescribed medical treatments.
• Physiological: Research indicates that negative age-related stereotypes are predictive of detrimental brain changes, such as the accumulation of plaques associated with Alzheimer’s Disease.

These impacts underscore that ageism is not merely a social issue but a critical public health crisis that undermines the goal of ensuring healthy lives for all.

Ageism as a Barrier to Reducing Inequalities (SDG 10)

Widespread ageism is a fundamental driver of inequality, directly contravening the objectives of SDG 10: Reduced Inequalities. The social and economic exclusion of older persons results in increased social isolation, loneliness, and greater financial insecurity. By devaluing the contributions and rights of older individuals, societies fail to empower and promote the inclusion of all, irrespective of age. This systemic discrimination limits opportunities and reduces the overall quality of life, perpetuating a cycle of marginalization that the SDGs aim to dismantle.

Implications for Sustainable Communities and Housing (SDG 11)

The consequences of ageism extend to the physical environment, impacting progress toward SDG 11: Sustainable Cities and Communities. Fear of being perceived as old or burdensome can prevent seniors from seeking necessary assistance. This reluctance often results in individuals remaining in homes that are no longer safe or suitable for their needs, lacking proper nutrition, or mismanaging medications. Achieving sustainable and inclusive communities requires the provision of safe, affordable, and accessible housing options that support independence and provide necessary care. The development of communities such as Assisted Living, Memory Care, and Adult Family Homes is a critical component of building infrastructure that serves populations across the entire lifespan.

Strategic Recommendations for Aligning with the SDGs

To counteract the negative impacts of ageism and advance the Sustainable Development Goals, the following actions are recommended:

1. Promote a “Pro-Aging” Philosophy: Actively foster a societal narrative that views aging as a stage of continued growth, opportunity, and strength, thereby supporting the mental and physical well-being targets of SDG 3.
2. Combat Systemic Ageism: Implement educational campaigns and policies aimed at dismantling negative stereotypes to advance the goals of social inclusion and equality outlined in SDG 10.
3. Develop Age-Inclusive Environments: Prioritize the creation of safe, supportive, and accessible living communities for older adults, directly contributing to the objectives of SDG 11.
4. Facilitate Access to Supportive Services: Encourage the use of specialized advisory services to help older persons and their families navigate housing and care options, ensuring their needs are met with dignity and respect, in line with the overarching principles of the SDGs.

Analysis of Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) in the Article

1. Which SDGs are addressed or connected to the issues highlighted in the article?

1. SDG 3: Good Health and Well-being
   • The article extensively discusses the negative impacts of ageism on the physical and mental health of older persons. It cites a WHO report linking ageist attitudes to “poorer physical and mental health” and “premature death.” Specific health issues mentioned include psychological stress, noncompliance with prescribed medications, and physiological brain changes connected to Alzheimer’s Disease. The call for proper care in settings like Assisted Living and Memory Care further reinforces the connection to health and well-being.
2. SDG 10: Reduced Inequalities
   • The central theme of the article is ageism, which is a form of discrimination and inequality based on age. The article highlights that “every second person in the world is believed to hold ageist attitudes,” demonstrating a global inequality. It addresses the consequences of this inequality, such as “increased social isolation and loneliness, greater financial insecurity, and reduced quality of life,” directly aligning with the goal of reducing inequalities and promoting the social inclusion of all, irrespective of age.
3. SDG 11: Sustainable Cities and Communities
   • The article touches upon the living conditions and safety of seniors within their communities. It notes that ageism can lead to seniors “staying in homes that are not safe.” By advocating for solutions like Senior Housing Advisors to find appropriate communities (Assisted Living, Memory Care, Adult Family Homes), the article addresses the need for safe, supportive, and adequate housing for the elderly population, which is a key component of creating inclusive and sustainable communities.

2. What specific targets under those SDGs can be identified based on the article’s content?

1. Target 3.4: By 2030, reduce by one third premature mortality from non-communicable diseases through prevention and treatment and promote mental health and well-being.
   • The article connects directly to this target by explaining how ageism leads to poorer mental health (stress) and behaviors (noncompliance with medication) that can exacerbate non-communicable diseases. The WHO report cited explicitly states that ageism leads to “premature death.” Promoting a “pro-aging” philosophy and ensuring proper care are measures aimed at improving well-being and preventing these negative health outcomes.
2. Target 10.2: By 2030, empower and promote the social, economic and political inclusion of all, irrespective of age, sex, disability, race, ethnicity, origin, religion or economic or other status.
   • This target is at the core of the article’s message. The entire piece is a call to action against the social exclusion of older people caused by ageist attitudes. By highlighting consequences like “social isolation and loneliness” and advocating for a society that honors and respects the aging process, the article directly argues for the empowerment and social inclusion of people of all ages.
3. Target 11.1: By 2030, ensure access for all to adequate, safe and affordable housing and basic services and upgrade slums.
   • The article identifies a specific problem related to this target by stating that seniors are “staying in homes that are not safe.” The proposed solution of enlisting Senior Housing Advisors to find communities like Assisted Living or Memory Care is a direct response to the need for safe and adequate housing that provides necessary services for this demographic.

3. Are there any indicators mentioned or implied in the article that can be used to measure progress towards the identified targets?

1. Proportion of the population holding ageist attitudes.
   • The article explicitly mentions a quantifiable indicator from the World Health Organization: “every second person in the world is believed to hold ageist attitudes.” Tracking this percentage over time would be a direct way to measure progress in combating the discriminatory views that lead to the inequalities discussed under Target 10.2.
2. Prevalence of poor health outcomes linked to ageism.
   • The article implies several health indicators. Progress towards Target 3.4 could be measured by monitoring rates of stress, medication noncompliance, social isolation, and loneliness among the elderly population. Furthermore, the article’s reference to “detrimental brain changes” suggests that tracking the incidence of conditions like Alzheimer’s Disease in relation to perceived ageism could be another potential, albeit complex, indicator.
3. Proportion of older persons living in safe and supportive housing.
   • An indicator for Target 11.1 is implied when the article mentions seniors “staying in homes that are not safe.” Measuring the percentage of the elderly population living in conditions deemed unsafe or lacking necessary support, and conversely, the percentage successfully housed in supportive communities (like those mentioned), would serve as a measure of progress.

4. Table of Identified SDGs, Targets, and Indicators

Source: mltnews.com