A hormone that silences the immune system may unlock new cancer treatments – ScienceDaily

A hormone that silences the immune system may unlock new cancer treatments – ScienceDaily

 

Report on a Novel Immunotherapy Pathway and its Alignment with Sustainable Development Goals

Executive Summary

A study conducted at UT Southwestern Medical Center has identified a critical molecular interaction that enables cancer cells to evade the body’s immune system. The research elucidates how the hormone Secretogranin-2 (SCG2) binds to the LILRB4 receptor on myeloid immune cells, thereby suppressing their anti-tumor functions. This discovery presents a significant opportunity for developing new immunotherapies and treatments for inflammatory diseases, directly contributing to the achievement of Sustainable Development Goal 3 (SDG 3): Good Health and Well-being.

Detailed Research Findings

Identification of the SCG2-LILRB4 Immune-Inhibitory Axis

The research focused on myeloid cells, which are among the first immune responders to tumors but are often co-opted to support cancer growth. The study builds on the prior identification of an inhibitory receptor on these cells, LILRB4, which, when stimulated, blocks their tumor-fighting capabilities. Key findings from the investigation include:

  • A genome-wide screen identified the hormone SCG2 as the protein that interacts with and stimulates the LILRB4 receptor.
  • Laboratory experiments confirmed that the binding of SCG2 to LILRB4 initiates a signaling cascade that deactivates the anti-cancer functions of myeloid cells.
  • This interaction was also shown to inhibit the myeloid cells’ ability to recruit cancer-fighting T cells to the tumor site.

In Vivo Validation and Therapeutic Potential

The mechanism was validated using mouse models, which demonstrated that disrupting the SCG2-LILRB4 interaction can significantly impede cancer progression. The experimental outcomes were as follows:

  1. In mice engineered to express human LILRB4, cancer cells producing SCG2 formed rapidly growing tumors.
  2. Treatment with an antibody that blocks the LILRB4 receptor resulted in a significant slowing of cancer growth.
  3. Similarly, eliminating SCG2 from the animals’ bodies also inhibited tumor development.

Implications for Sustainable Development Goals

Advancing SDG 3: Good Health and Well-being

This research directly supports the objectives of SDG 3, which aims to ensure healthy lives and promote well-being for all at all ages. The findings are particularly relevant to Target 3.4, which seeks to reduce premature mortality from non-communicable diseases, including cancer.

  • New Cancer Therapies: By targeting the SCG2-LILRB4 interaction, new immunotherapies could be developed. This offers a novel approach to overcome the limitations of current treatments, which are effective in only 20%-30% of patients, thereby contributing to improved cancer survival rates.
  • Treatment for Inflammatory Disorders: The discovery also has converse applications. Leveraging the immune-suppressing function of this pathway by administering SCG2 could lead to new treatments for autoimmune or inflammatory disorders, further promoting global health and well-being.

Contribution to SDG 9 (Industry, Innovation, and Infrastructure) and SDG 17 (Partnerships for the Goals)

The study exemplifies the principles of scientific innovation and collaboration essential for achieving the SDGs.

  • Fostering Scientific Innovation (SDG 9): The research represents a significant advancement in scientific knowledge, enhancing the technological and research capabilities required to tackle complex health challenges like cancer.
  • Strengthening Partnerships (SDG 17): The project was a collaborative effort involving numerous researchers and departments at UT Southwestern and was supported by a diverse range of funding bodies, including the National Cancer Institute (NCI) and the Cancer Prevention and Research Institute of Texas (CPRIT). This multi-stakeholder partnership underscores the collaborative approach needed to drive progress in global health.

Conclusion

The identification of the SCG2-LILRB4 pathway as a mechanism of immune evasion by cancer is a pivotal scientific breakthrough. Its potential to yield a new class of immunotherapies aligns directly with the global agenda to reduce the burden of non-communicable diseases as outlined in SDG 3. Furthermore, the research highlights the critical role of scientific innovation and collaborative partnerships in achieving sustainable development in global health.

1. Which SDGs are addressed or connected to the issues highlighted in the article?

The article on cancer research at UT Southwestern Medical Center connects to several Sustainable Development Goals, primarily focusing on health, innovation, and collaboration.

  • SDG 3: Good Health and Well-being

    This is the most directly relevant SDG. The entire article focuses on medical research aimed at understanding and treating cancer, a major non-communicable disease. The discovery of how the SCG2 hormone and LILRB4 receptor interaction suppresses the immune system is a critical step toward developing “new immunotherapy approaches for treating cancer,” which directly supports the goal of ensuring healthy lives and promoting well-being.

  • SDG 9: Industry, Innovation, and Infrastructure

    The research described is a prime example of scientific innovation. The article details a “genome-wide screen,” the identification of a new biological pathway, and the development of potential new treatments. This work relies on advanced scientific infrastructure at UT Southwestern Medical Center and represents a significant investment in research and development (R&D), which is central to SDG 9’s aim to foster innovation.

  • SDG 17: Partnerships for the Goals

    The article highlights the collaborative nature of the research. It mentions a team of researchers from various departments (“Physiology,” “Pharmacology and Biophysics,” “Pathology,” etc.) and significant funding from a mix of public and private entities. The study was funded by “the National Cancer Institute (NCI),” the “Cancer Prevention and Research Institute of Texas (CPRIT),” “The Welch Foundation,” and a private company, “Immune-Onc Therapeutics Inc.” This multi-stakeholder partnership, combining public grants and private investment to achieve a common goal, is the essence of SDG 17.

2. What specific targets under those SDGs can be identified based on the article’s content?

Based on the article’s focus, several specific SDG targets can be identified:

  • Target 3.4 (under SDG 3)

    “By 2030, reduce by one third premature mortality from non-communicable diseases through prevention and treatment and promote mental health and well-being.”
    The research directly addresses this target. Cancer is a leading non-communicable disease (NCD), and the development of new immunotherapies aims to improve treatment outcomes. The article notes that current therapies are “effective for only about 20%-30% of cancer patients,” and this research could “offer a new immunotherapy option to treat cancer,” thereby contributing to the reduction of premature mortality from this disease.

  • Target 9.5 (under SDG 9)

    “Enhance scientific research, upgrade the technological capabilities of industrial sectors in all countries…including, by 2030, encouraging innovation and substantially increasing the number of research and development workers per 1 million people and public and private research and development spending.”
    The article is a case study for this target. It describes advanced scientific research conducted by a large team of Ph.D.-level researchers and funded by significant public and private R&D spending from institutions like the NCI and CPRIT. This enhances scientific knowledge and encourages innovation in the medical field.

  • Target 17.17 (under SDG 17)

    “Encourage and promote effective public, public-private and civil society partnerships, building on the experience and resourcing strategies of partnerships.”
    The funding and collaboration model described in the article exemplifies this target. The project is supported by a mix of public funding (National Cancer Institute, a federal agency), state funding (Cancer Prevention and Research Institute of Texas), and private funding (“Immune-Onc Therapeutics Inc.”). This public-private partnership is crucial for mobilizing the financial resources needed for high-cost, high-impact medical research.

3. Are there any indicators mentioned or implied in the article that can be used to measure progress towards the identified targets?

The article implies several indicators that can be used to measure progress toward the identified targets, even if it does not state them numerically.

  • Indicator for Target 3.4

    The implied indicator is the mortality rate attributed to cancer. The research aims to develop more effective treatments. The success of these potential new therapies would be measured by their ability to improve patient survival rates and reduce cancer-related deaths. The article’s mention that current treatments are only effective for “20%-30% of cancer patients” highlights the need to improve this metric.

  • Indicators for Target 9.5

    Two indicators are implied:

    1. Research and development expenditure: The article explicitly lists the sources of funding, including “grants from the National Cancer Institute (NCI),” “the Cancer Prevention and Research Institute of Texas (RP220032…),” and a “Sponsored Research Grant” from a private company. These grants and financial agreements represent the R&D expenditure dedicated to this area of scientific research.
    2. Number of researchers: The article names a substantial team of scientists (“Cheng Cheng ‘Alec’ Zhang, Ph.D.,” “Xing Yang, Ph.D.,” “Xuewu Zhang, Ph.D.,” and many others). This highlights the human capital—the number of R&D workers—invested in this innovative project.
  • Indicator for Target 17.17

    An implied indicator is the value of financial resources committed to public-private partnerships. The article details a partnership involving public entities (UT Southwestern, NCI) and a private entity (“Immune-Onc Therapeutics Inc.”). The mention of a “Sponsored Research Grant” and the fact that “The University of Texas has a financial interest in Immune-Onc” points to a quantifiable financial commitment that defines this partnership.

4. Create a table with three columns titled ‘SDGs, Targets and Indicators” to present the findings from analyzing the article.

SDGs Targets Indicators (Mentioned or Implied in the Article)
SDG 3: Good Health and Well-being Target 3.4: Reduce premature mortality from non-communicable diseases (NCDs) through treatment. Implied: Mortality rate attributed to cancer. The research aims to create new immunotherapies to improve treatment efficacy beyond the current 20-30% success rate.
SDG 9: Industry, Innovation, and Infrastructure Target 9.5: Enhance scientific research and increase R&D spending and the number of researchers. Implied:
  • Research and development expenditure (evidenced by grants from NCI, CPRIT, etc.).
  • Number of researchers (evidenced by the long list of contributing Ph.D.s).
SDG 17: Partnerships for the Goals Target 17.17: Encourage and promote effective public-private partnerships. Implied: Financial resources committed to public-private partnerships (evidenced by funding from public sources like NCI and private sources like Immune-Onc Therapeutics Inc.).

Source: sciencedaily.com