Bjorn Lomborg: Get the World Bank’s focus off climate and back on tackling poverty – Yahoo! Finance Canada

Report on World Bank’s Strategic Focus and Alignment with Sustainable Development Goals

Introduction: A Call to Realign Priorities

A recent directive from the United States, the World Bank’s largest shareholder, has called for the institution to recalibrate its strategic focus. The U.S. Treasury has urged the Bank to move away from its emphasis on climate-specific financing targets and return to its core mandate of global poverty alleviation. This call advocates for a renewed focus on achieving fundamental Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), specifically:

• SDG 1 (No Poverty): Prioritizing direct poverty reduction initiatives.
• SDG 7 (Affordable and Clean Energy): Increasing access to affordable and reliable energy sources.
• SDG 8 (Decent Work and Economic Growth): Fostering conditions for sustainable economic growth.

This report analyzes the implications of the World Bank’s current strategy on the broader 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development.

Analysis of Current Investment Strategy

Following the 2015 Paris Agreement, the World Bank significantly shifted its investment portfolio towards climate-related projects. In the last fiscal year, this commitment amounted to US$42.6 billion directed at climate financing. This strategic direction raises concerns that substantial financial resources are being diverted from foundational development programs. The allocation of funds towards SDG 13 (Climate Action) is seen by critics as potentially undermining progress on other equally critical SDGs. Research indicates that direct development investments often yield more significant and immediate benefits per dollar spent compared to climate mitigation and adaptation projects.

Impact Assessment on Key Sustainable Development Goals

An evaluation of investment efficacy suggests a disparity in outcomes between direct development aid and climate-focused spending. The argument posits that tackling poverty through climate action is an indirect and inefficient strategy that may negatively impact the world’s most vulnerable populations by increasing essential costs.

1. Direct Development Investments: Research consistently shows that investments targeting specific development outcomes deliver superior returns. These include programs aimed at:
   • SDG 3 (Good Health and Well-being): Improving maternal and child health.
   • SDG 4 (Quality Education): Enhancing access to education, including e-learning platforms.
   • SDG 2 (Zero Hunger): Boosting agricultural productivity and food security.
2. Climate-Focused Investments: Assisting developing nations with aggressive emissions cuts is reported to yield negligible results for both development and climate by 2030. Furthermore, such policies can impede progress on SDG 1 by increasing the cost of energy and agricultural inputs like fertilizer.

The Challenge of Energy Access and Economic Growth

Access to affordable and reliable energy is a cornerstone for achieving multiple SDGs, particularly for industrialization and job creation in developing nations. The World Bank’s “Mission 300” initiative, which aims to provide electricity to 300 million people in Africa by 2030, is a critical step towards SDG 7.

Critique of Renewables-First Approach

The initiative’s reported focus on renewable energy sources is a point of contention. While solar and wind are cost-effective under optimal conditions, their intermittency requires extensive and expensive backup infrastructure, which can drive up overall electricity costs. This challenges the “affordable” component of SDG 7. Data from Africa indicates a pragmatic approach by national leaders, where consumption of energy from fossil fuels is increasing at a rate 22 times greater than that of solar and wind. This trend underscores a prioritization of reliability and affordability to fuel progress toward SDG 8 (Decent Work and Economic Growth) and SDG 9 (Industry, Innovation, and Infrastructure).

Recommendations for Future Strategic Direction

To better serve the global poor and accelerate progress across the full spectrum of Sustainable Development Goals, the following strategic adjustments for the World Bank are recommended:

1. Re-center on Core Mandate: Realign institutional priorities and financial flows to directly address SDG 1 (No Poverty), acknowledging that this remains the most pressing concern for client nations, as indicated in the Bank’s own surveys.
2. Support Balanced Energy Pathways: In pursuing SDG 7, adopt a technology-neutral stance that allows developing countries to utilize reliable and cost-effective energy sources, including fossil fuels, essential for building robust economies and achieving SDG 8.
3. Promote Technological Innovation: Advocate for developed nations to lead on SDG 13 by investing in research and development to create breakthrough green energy technologies that are affordable and accessible for all, rather than diverting development funds to deploy current, less efficient solutions.

Analysis of Sustainable Development Goals in the Article

1. Which SDGs are addressed or connected to the issues highlighted in the article?

   • SDG 1: No Poverty – This is the central theme of the article. The text explicitly states the World Bank’s core business should be “ending poverty” and that its focus on climate is a “raid on development funds” that harms the world’s poor.
   • SDG 7: Affordable and Clean Energy – The article extensively discusses the need for “affordable and reliable energy” for developing nations. It highlights the debate between renewables and fossil fuels and mentions the World Bank’s “Mission 300” initiative to increase electricity access in Africa.
   • SDG 8: Decent Work and Economic Growth – The article argues that access to cheap energy is necessary for developing nations to “industrialize, create jobs, and thrive” and to “boost growth.”
   • SDG 13: Climate Action – This goal is presented as a competing priority to poverty reduction. The article critiques the World Bank for “obsessing about climate,” committing billions to “climate projects,” and pursuing “aggressive emissions cuts” at the expense of development.
   • SDG 2: Zero Hunger – This is indirectly addressed when the article mentions “enhancing agricultural yields” as a more effective development investment and notes that a climate focus can “harm the world’s poor by driving up the costs of fertilizer.”
   • SDG 3: Good Health and Well-being – The article indirectly references this goal by citing “improving maternal health” and “improving nutrition” as examples of core development investments that deliver greater benefits than climate spending.
   • SDG 4: Quality Education – This goal is touched upon when the article lists “advancing e-learning” as a more beneficial development investment compared to climate projects.

2. What specific targets under those SDGs can be identified based on the article’s content?

   • Target 1.1: By 2030, eradicate extreme poverty for all people everywhere. The article’s main argument is that the World Bank should refocus on its “core business of ending poverty.”
   • Target 7.1: By 2030, ensure universal access to affordable, reliable and modern energy services. This is directly addressed by the World Bank’s “Mission 300” initiative, which “aims to connect 300 million more Africans to electricity by 2030.” The call to “increase access to affordable and reliable energy” also aligns with this target.
   • Target 8.1: Sustain per capita economic growth in accordance with national circumstances and, in particular, at least 7 per cent gross domestic product growth per annum in the least developed countries. The article supports this by advocating for policies that “boost growth” and allow nations to “industrialize, create jobs, and thrive.”
   • Target 13.a: Implement the commitment undertaken by developed-country parties to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change to a goal of mobilizing jointly $100 billion annually by 2020 from all sources to address the needs of developing countries. The article critiques the scale of this financing, noting the World Bank “poured US$42.6 billion into climate projects” last year, arguing this money should be used for poverty reduction instead.

3. Are there any indicators mentioned or implied in the article that can be used to measure progress towards the identified targets?

   • Indicator for Target 7.1: The article provides a clear, quantifiable indicator related to electricity access: the goal to “connect 300 million more Africans to electricity by 2030.” This directly measures progress towards universal access. It also provides comparative data points on energy consumption, such as “Africa added five kWhs of electricity from solar and wind per person” versus adding “almost five times more per person from fossil fuels,” which can serve as indicators of energy source trends.
   • Indicator for Target 13.a: The article explicitly mentions a financial figure that serves as an indicator for climate finance mobilization: the “US$42.6 billion” the World Bank invested “into climate projects” last year. This figure is a direct measure of financial flows dedicated to climate action.
   • Implied Indicator for Target 8.1: The article’s call to “boost growth” implies the use of economic growth rates, such as the annual growth rate of real GDP per capita (Indicator 8.1.1), as a measure of success for developing nations.
   • Implied Indicator for Target 1.1: While no specific poverty rate is mentioned, the overarching goal of “ending poverty” implies that the primary indicator would be the proportion of the population living below the international poverty line (Indicator 1.1.1).

SDG Analysis Summary Table

Source: ca.finance.yahoo.com