Maternal support grant could reduce child poverty in South Africa – novanews.co.za

Nov 2, 2025 - 09:30
 0  2
Maternal support grant could reduce child poverty in South Africa – novanews.co.za

 

Report on the Proposed Maternal Support Grant in South Africa and its Alignment with Sustainable Development Goals

1.0 Introduction: The Socio-Economic Imperative for Intervention

A coalition of non-governmental organisations and researchers has presented a formal proposal to the South African government for the establishment of a Maternal Support Grant (MSG). This report analyses the proposal, which addresses the critical issues of rising child poverty and malnutrition. The initiative is positioned as a vital policy intervention to help South Africa achieve several key Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), particularly those related to poverty, hunger, health, and equality.

  • SDG 1 (No Poverty): Nearly 70% of children in South Africa live in poverty.
  • SDG 2 (Zero Hunger): Almost 40% of households are unable to meet basic nutritional needs, leading to stunting and long-term health complications.

2.0 Proposal Framework and Economic Justification

The proposed MSG is designed as a targeted, cost-effective social protection measure. Its implementation is projected to yield significant long-term economic and social returns, contributing directly to SDG 10 (Reduced Inequalities) by investing in the nation’s human capital from the earliest stage.

  1. Target Beneficiaries: Approximately 800,000 impoverished pregnant women annually.
  2. Grant Duration: A nine-month period, commencing in the second trimester and extending three months postpartum.
  3. Function: To provide a crucial financial bridge to the existing Child Support Grant (CSG), ensuring nutritional support during the critical first 1,000 days of a child’s life.

2.1 Financial Overview

  • Estimated Annual Cost: R2 billion (0.1% of total government expenditure).
  • Projected National Savings: R13.8 billion through the prevention of low-birth-weight births and stunting, which incur significant long-term costs on the healthcare and education systems.

3.0 Direct Contribution to Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

The MSG is a multi-faceted policy tool that directly advances South Africa’s commitment to the global 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development.

  • SDG 1 (No Poverty) & SDG 10 (Reduced Inequalities): The grant provides a direct financial lifeline to vulnerable women, aiming to break intergenerational cycles of poverty. It specifically supports women in informal employment who are often excluded from statutory maternity benefits.
  • SDG 2 (Zero Hunger): By providing income support during pregnancy, the MSG enables access to better nutrition, directly combating maternal and child malnutrition and reducing the incidence of stunting.
  • SDG 3 (Good Health and Well-being): The policy is designed to improve maternal and child health outcomes by lowering maternal stress and reducing the prevalence of low-birth-weight babies, a key predictor of future health challenges.
  • SDG 4 (Quality Education): By ensuring proper nutrition in the womb and early months, the grant mitigates the risk of poor cognitive development, thereby laying a stronger foundation for future educational attainment.
  • SDG 5 (Gender Equality): The grant enhances the economic agency of women during a period of heightened vulnerability, promoting financial independence and gender equity.

4.0 Addressing Gaps in the Social Protection System

A significant weakness in the current social support structure is the gap in coverage for newborns. Data indicates that nearly half of all infants eligible for the Child Support Grant do not access it within their first year, leaving them vulnerable to nutritional deficiencies. The MSG is designed to close this gap, ensuring that financial support reaches families earlier and more consistently. This aligns with the core SDG principle of “leaving no one behind.”

5.0 Recommendation

The coalition urges the Department of Social Development to expedite the tabling of the Maternal Support Grant policy before the Cabinet for approval. The implementation of the MSG is not merely a social welfare measure but a strategic investment in public health, education, and economic stability. It represents a critical and realisable opportunity for South Africa to make substantial progress towards its national development objectives and its commitments under the Sustainable Development Goals.

SDGs Addressed in the Article

SDG 1: No Poverty

  • The article directly addresses poverty by highlighting that “Nearly 70% of South African children live in poverty.” The proposed Maternal Support Grant (MSG) is a social protection measure designed as a “financial lifeline” to “help poor pregnant women” and break “intergenerational cycles of poverty.”

SDG 2: Zero Hunger

  • This goal is central to the article, which focuses on rising “child poverty and malnutrition.” The MSG aims to ensure newborns receive “proper nutrition” and to combat the fact that “almost 40% of households unable to meet basic nutritional needs.” The prevention of stunting is a primary objective mentioned multiple times.

SDG 3: Good Health and Well-being

  • The article connects income support during pregnancy directly to health outcomes. It states that the grant improves “maternal and child nutrition” and reduces the “incidence of low-birth-weight babies,” which is described as a “key predictor of stunting.” This focuses on improving the health of both mothers and newborns.

SDG 5: Gender Equality

  • The grant is framed as an issue of justice and gender equality. It specifically aims to “support women in informal work who are excluded from maternity benefits” and provide them with “economic agency when they need it most,” thereby addressing systemic inequalities faced by women.

SDG 10: Reduced Inequalities

  • The article explicitly states that the MSG would “help reduce inequality.” By targeting support to poor pregnant women, particularly those in informal work without access to other benefits, the grant is a direct policy intervention aimed at reducing economic disparities within the population.

Specific SDG Targets Identified

SDG 1: No Poverty

  • Target 1.3: Implement nationally appropriate social protection systems and measures for all, including floors, and by 2030 achieve substantial coverage of the poor and the vulnerable.

    Explanation: The proposed Maternal Support Grant is a clear example of a social protection system designed to provide a “financial lifeline” to a vulnerable group—poor pregnant women. The article mentions it would act as a “bridge to the Child Support Grant (CSG),” strengthening the national social protection floor.

SDG 2: Zero Hunger

  • Target 2.2: By 2030, end all forms of malnutrition, including achieving, by 2025, the internationally agreed targets on stunting and wasting in children under 5 years of age, and address the nutritional needs of adolescent girls, pregnant and lactating women and older persons.

    Explanation: The article’s primary motivation for the grant is to prevent “stunting” and improve “maternal and child nutrition.” It directly addresses the nutritional needs of pregnant women to ensure proper development in the womb and early months of life.

SDG 3: Good Health and Well-being

  • Target 3.2: By 2030, end preventable deaths of newborns and children under 5 years of age.

    Explanation: The article emphasizes that the grant aims to reduce the “incidence of low-birth-weight babies.” Low birth weight is a leading cause of neonatal mortality. By addressing this, the grant contributes directly to ending the preventable deaths of newborns.

SDG 5: Gender Equality

  • Target 5.4: Recognize and value unpaid care and domestic work through the provision of public services, infrastructure and social protection policies.

    Explanation: The MSG is a social protection policy that provides economic support to women, including those in “informal work who are excluded from maternity benefits.” This recognizes the unique economic vulnerabilities of women during pregnancy and early motherhood and provides a formal support structure.

SDG 10: Reduced Inequalities

  • Target 10.4: Adopt policies, especially fiscal, wage and social protection policies, and progressively achieve greater equality.

    Explanation: The proposal for the government to approve the MSG is a call to adopt a specific social protection policy. The article explicitly states the grant’s purpose is to “reduce inequality” by providing targeted financial support to the most economically disadvantaged women.

Indicators for Measuring Progress

SDG 1: No Poverty

  • Indicator (Implied): Proportion of the population covered by social protection systems.

    Explanation: The article provides a specific number for this indicator, stating the grant “would reach around 800,000 women,” which can be used to measure the coverage of this social protection policy.

SDG 2: Zero Hunger

  • Indicator (Mentioned): Prevalence of stunting among children under 5 years of age.

    Explanation: The article repeatedly mentions that a key goal and expected outcome of the grant is the prevention of “stunting.” Measuring the rate of stunting would be a direct way to assess the grant’s impact.

SDG 3: Good Health and Well-being

  • Indicator (Mentioned): Incidence of low-birth-weight babies.

    Explanation: The article explicitly states that income support during pregnancy “reduces the incidence of low-birth-weight babies.” This is a clear, measurable health indicator that can be tracked to evaluate the success of the MSG.

SDG 5: Gender Equality

  • Indicator (Implied): Implementation of social protection policies that provide maternity benefits to women in informal employment.

    Explanation: The very existence and implementation of the MSG, specifically for women excluded from other maternity benefits, serves as an indicator of progress towards providing social protection for all women.

SDG 10: Reduced Inequalities

  • Indicator (Implied): Percentage of children living in poverty.

    Explanation: The article establishes a baseline by stating, “Nearly 70% of South African children live in poverty.” A reduction in this percentage over time would be a key indicator of the grant’s success in reducing inequality and breaking “intergenerational cycles of poverty.”

Summary of SDGs, Targets, and Indicators

SDGs Targets Indicators
SDG 1: No Poverty 1.3: Implement nationally appropriate social protection systems for the poor and vulnerable. Proportion of the population covered by social protection (specifically, the “800,000 women” who would receive the grant).
SDG 2: Zero Hunger 2.2: End all forms of malnutrition, including stunting, and address the nutritional needs of pregnant women. Prevalence of stunting in children under 5.
SDG 3: Good Health and Well-being 3.2: End preventable deaths of newborns and children under 5 years of age. Incidence of low-birth-weight babies.
SDG 5: Gender Equality 5.4: Recognize and value unpaid care and domestic work through social protection policies. Implementation of a social protection policy providing maternity benefits to women in informal work.
SDG 10: Reduced Inequalities 10.4: Adopt social protection policies to progressively achieve greater equality. Percentage of children living in poverty (baseline of “Nearly 70%”).

Source: novanews.co.za

 

What is Your Reaction?

Like Like 0
Dislike Dislike 0
Love Love 0
Funny Funny 0
Angry Angry 0
Sad Sad 0
Wow Wow 0
sdgtalks I was built to make this world a better place :)