Oregon’s early child care crisis impacts all but two of the state’s 36 counties – Ashland News

Report on the Early Childhood Education Crisis in Oregon and its Implications for Sustainable Development Goals

Executive Summary: Economic Instability and Systemic Challenges

Oregon’s early childhood education sector is facing a significant crisis, characterized by a severe shortage of care for infants and toddlers, low wages for its workforce, and the looming threat of federal cuts to social safety nets. This situation directly undermines progress toward several key United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), including No Poverty (SDG 1), Good Health and Well-being (SDG 3), Quality Education (SDG 4), Gender Equality (SDG 5), and Decent Work and Economic Growth (SDG 8). The financial precarity of child care providers, particularly in rural areas, threatens the foundational support systems for families and the state’s economic vitality.

SDG 1 & SDG 8: Decent Work and Poverty in the Early Education Workforce

The compensation for early education workers in Oregon fails to meet the standard of decent work, trapping many in a cycle of poverty and economic instability. This directly contravenes the objectives of SDG 1 (No Poverty) and SDG 8 (Decent Work and Economic Growth).

• Poverty Levels: According to 2024 data from the University of California at Berkeley, 15.8% of Oregon’s early childhood education workforce lives at or below the poverty level.
• Low Wages: The median wage for the sector is $14.33 per hour (approximately $30,000 annually), which is significantly lower than the median wage for fast food workers ($16.56 per hour).
• Failed Legislation: Attempts to provide financial relief, such as Oregon Senate Bill 467 which proposed an income tax refund for child care workers, failed to pass, highlighting a lack of political prioritization for the sector’s workforce.

SDG 4 & SDG 10: Quality Education and Reduced Inequalities

The widespread lack of accessible child care creates significant barriers to quality early education and exacerbates inequalities, particularly for families in rural communities. This challenges the principles of SDG 4 (Quality Education) and SDG 10 (Reduced Inequalities).

1. Child Care Deserts: Thirty-four counties in Oregon are classified as “child care deserts” for infants and toddlers, meaning there are more than three children for every available licensed care slot. Harney County, for example, has no licensed providers for this age group.
2. Funding Disparities: State subsidy programs like Preschool Promise, while beneficial, are reportedly receding. Funding is often concentrated in diverse, underserved populations, which can leave less diverse but still low-income rural counties with insufficient resources.
3. Unsustainable Funding: Local efforts to bridge financial gaps rely on grants and nonprofit aid, but these funding sources are reported to be diminishing, creating further instability.

SDG 3 & SDG 5: Health, Well-being, and Gender Equality

The stability of the child care sector is intrinsically linked to the health of its workforce and principles of gender equality. Proposed federal cuts to public health programs threaten to dismantle the system, disproportionately affecting a workforce predominantly composed of women.

• Dependence on Public Health Programs: Research from Georgetown University indicates that nearly 45% of child care providers in Oregon rely on Medicaid for health care coverage.
• Impact of Federal Cuts: Proposed cuts to Medicaid and SNAP under the Trump administration’s One Big Beautiful Bill Act are projected to have a devastating impact. The loss of health care could force many providers, who operate on extremely thin margins, to close their doors.
• Gendered Implications: As the early education workforce is primarily female, these economic and health-related pressures represent a significant challenge to SDG 5 (Gender Equality) by undermining the financial security and well-being of women workers. The lack of child care also limits the ability of parents, often mothers, to participate in the broader economy.

Analysis of Sustainable Development Goals in the Article

1. Which SDGs are addressed or connected to the issues highlighted in the article?

1. SDG 1: No Poverty
   • The article directly addresses this goal by highlighting that a significant portion of the early childhood education workforce in Oregon, 15.8%, lives at or below the poverty level. The proposed cuts to social safety net programs like SNAP are also directly related to poverty and food security for these low-wage workers.
2. SDG 3: Good Health and Well-being
   • This goal is relevant due to the discussion of Medicaid cuts. The article states that nearly 45% of child care providers in Oregon rely on Medicaid for their health care. The potential loss of this coverage directly threatens the health and well-being of these essential workers.
3. SDG 4: Quality Education
   • The core theme of the article is the crisis in early childhood education and care, which is a foundational element of SDG 4. The existence of “child care deserts” in 34 Oregon counties for infants and toddlers shows a lack of access to quality early childhood development and care, which is crucial for a child’s readiness for primary education.
4. SDG 5: Gender Equality
   • While not explicitly stated, the early childhood education sector is predominantly female. The low wages, poor working conditions, and lack of social protection disproportionately affect women, hindering their economic empowerment. The struggle for affordable child care is also a major barrier for working mothers, connecting the issue to broader gender equality.
5. SDG 8: Decent Work and Economic Growth
   • This goal is central to the article’s discussion of the child care workforce. The median wage for these workers ($14.33 per hour) is below that of fast food workers and is insufficient to provide a living wage, indicating a lack of “decent work.” The article discusses legislative efforts, like Senate Bill 467, aimed at improving their income, which aligns with promoting productive employment and decent work for all.
6. SDG 10: Reduced Inequalities
   • The article highlights multiple layers of inequality. There is an income inequality, with child care workers earning poverty-level wages. There is also a geographic inequality, as rural counties like Harney and Wheeler are “hit hardest” by the lack of providers and funding. The article notes that funding like Preschool Promise is concentrated in diverse areas, while “less diverse but still low income” rural counties struggle, pointing to inequality in resource distribution.

2. What specific targets under those SDGs can be identified based on the article’s content?

1. Target 1.2: By 2030, reduce at least by half the proportion of men, women and children of all ages living in poverty in all its dimensions according to national definitions.
   • The article’s statistic that 15.8% of the early childhood workforce lives at or below the poverty level directly relates to this target of poverty reduction.
2. Target 1.3: Implement nationally appropriate social protection systems and measures for all… and achieve substantial coverage of the poor and the vulnerable.
   • The discussion of cuts to Medicaid and SNAP, which are key social protection systems in the U.S., connects directly to this target. The article shows how these systems are vital for the vulnerable population of low-wage child care workers.
3. Target 3.8: Achieve universal health coverage, including financial risk protection, access to quality essential health-care services…
   • The fact that 45% of child care providers rely on Medicaid for health care demonstrates the importance of public health coverage for this workforce. Proposed cuts threaten their access to essential health services, making this target highly relevant.
4. Target 4.2: By 2030, ensure that all girls and boys have access to quality early childhood development, care and pre-primary education so that they are ready for primary education.
   • This is the most direct target. The article’s focus on “child care deserts,” the lack of licensed providers for infants and toddlers, and the struggle to fund programs like Preschool Promise all point to the challenges in achieving this target in Oregon.
5. Target 8.5: By 2030, achieve full and productive employment and decent work for all women and men… and equal pay for work of equal value.
   • The low median wage of $14.33 per hour, which is less than that of fast food workers, illustrates the failure to provide “decent work” and “equal pay for work of equal value” for the crucial work of early childhood educators.
6. Target 10.4: Adopt policies, especially fiscal, wage and social protection policies, and progressively achieve greater equality.
   • The article discusses specific policies aimed at achieving greater equality for child care workers, such as the failed Senate Bill 467 for an income tax refund and subsidy programs like Preschool Promise. The cuts to Medicaid and SNAP represent a regression from this target.

3. Are there any indicators mentioned or implied in the article that can be used to measure progress towards the identified targets?

1. Proportion of the workforce living below the poverty line:
   • The article explicitly states that “15.8% of the 2024 early childhood education workforce in Oregon lived at or below the poverty level.” This is a direct indicator for measuring progress on SDG Target 1.2.
2. Median hourly wage:
   • The article provides the median wage for the workforce as “$14.33 an hour.” This can be used as an indicator to track progress towards decent work and fair pay under SDG Target 8.5. The comparison to the fast food worker median of $16.56 provides a benchmark for wage inequality.
3. Access to social protection programs:
   • The statistic that “Nearly 45% of child care providers in the state… rely on Medicaid for health care” serves as an indicator of the workforce’s dependence on social safety nets and their vulnerability to cuts, relevant to SDG Targets 1.3 and 3.8.
4. Availability of child care services:
   • The article identifies “34 Oregon counties” as “child care deserts” for infants and toddlers. A child care desert is defined as having “more than three children in need for every regulated child care slot.” These figures are clear indicators for measuring access to early childhood care as outlined in SDG Target 4.2.
5. Public funding and subsidies for child care:
   • The article mentions specific programs like “Preschool Promise, Oregon Prenatal to Kindergarten, and Employment Related Day Care.” The number of slots available in these programs and the amount of funding allocated (e.g., the “almost a million dollars” distributed in Clatsop County) can serve as indicators of public investment in early childhood education.

4. Table of SDGs, Targets, and Indicators

Source: ashland.news