Report on Higher Education Accessibility and Alignment with Sustainable Development Goals

Executive Summary

An analysis of the current discourse surrounding higher education in the United States reveals a significant focus on elite, highly selective universities. This narrative often excludes the majority of prospective students, particularly those with average academic records and from middle-income families. This report examines this disparity through the framework of the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), arguing that a shift in focus towards accessibility and affordability is crucial for achieving global targets related to education, equality, and economic growth.

Analysis of the Higher Education Landscape

The prevailing conversation about college selection is misaligned with the reality for most students. Key data points highlight this disconnect:

• Public attention and media rankings are dominated by a small number of Ivy League and elite research universities with low admission rates.
• The average Grade Point Average (GPA) for U.S. high school students is 3.0, a demographic often overlooked by elite-focused rankings.
• A primary concern for families, particularly those with incomes between $50,000 and $150,000, is the ability to find a college that is both accessible and affordable.

As noted by William Staib of College Raptor, the objective for the average student should be to “find a college they can both attend and afford with confidence.” This underscores a fundamental need for resources and metrics that prioritize accessibility over exclusivity.

Alignment with Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

The challenge of ensuring broad access to higher education is directly linked to several key Sustainable Development Goals.

1. SDG 4: Quality Education

   This goal is central to the issue. The current system’s emphasis on elite institutions directly contravenes the principles of inclusive and equitable education.

   • Target 4.3: Aims to “ensure equal access for all women and men to affordable and quality technical, vocational and tertiary education, including university.” A higher education landscape that prioritizes a small fraction of applicants fails to meet this global mandate for the general population.
   • Promoting a wider range of accessible and affordable institutions is essential for making progress on this target.

2. SDG 10: Reduced Inequalities

   The focus on elite schools can perpetuate and widen social and economic disparities.

   • Target 10.2: Calls for the empowerment and promotion of “the social, economic and political inclusion of all.” By creating barriers to higher education for average students, the current system limits social mobility and reinforces existing inequalities.
   • Shifting the focus to affordability and accessibility helps create more equitable pathways to economic and social advancement for a broader segment of society.

3. Supporting Goals: SDG 1 (No Poverty) and SDG 8 (Decent Work and Economic Growth)

   Accessible education is a foundational element for achieving other critical SDGs.

   • By enabling students to pursue higher education without incurring prohibitive debt, society supports SDG 1 by providing a direct pathway out of poverty.
   • A well-educated populace is fundamental to SDG 8, as it ensures that the workforce is equipped with the necessary skills for sustainable economic growth and decent work.

Conclusion

To align with the global vision outlined in the Sustainable Development Goals, the narrative surrounding higher education must evolve. A paradigm shift is required, moving away from a preoccupation with elite, exclusive institutions towards a model that champions accessibility, affordability, and quality for all students. By doing so, the higher education system can serve as a powerful engine for achieving a more equitable and sustainable future, in line with the objectives of SDG 4, SDG 10, and related development goals.

Analysis of the Article in Relation to Sustainable Development Goals

1. Which SDGs are addressed or connected to the issues highlighted in the article?

1. SDG 4: Quality Education
   • The article’s central theme is higher education, specifically the accessibility and affordability of college for the average student. This directly aligns with the goal of ensuring inclusive and equitable quality education and promoting lifelong learning opportunities for all.
2. SDG 10: Reduced Inequalities
   • The article highlights a disparity in the focus of college rankings, which often favor “Ivy Leagues, elite research universities,” leaving out the majority of students. By focusing on the needs of “everyday students” and “families earning an average income,” the article addresses the issue of reducing inequalities in access to educational opportunities based on academic standing and economic status.
3. SDG 1: No Poverty
   • While not explicitly mentioned, the issue of affordable education is intrinsically linked to poverty reduction. The article’s emphasis on finding a college that families can “afford with confidence” points to the financial burden of higher education, which can be a barrier to economic mobility and a factor in perpetuating cycles of poverty. Access to affordable education is a key tool for achieving economic stability.

2. What specific targets under those SDGs can be identified based on the article’s content?

1. Target 4.3: Ensure equal access for all women and men to affordable and quality technical, vocational and tertiary education, including university.
   • The article directly addresses this target by focusing on the challenge for “everyday students” to find a college they can “both attend and afford.” The term “attend” relates to access, while “afford” speaks directly to the affordability aspect of this target for tertiary education.
2. Target 10.2: By 2030, empower and promote the social, economic and political inclusion of all, irrespective of… economic or other status.
   • The article advocates for a shift in focus from elite institutions to those that serve “families earning an average income between $50,000-$150,000.” This promotes the economic and social inclusion of a significant portion of the population that is often overlooked in discussions about top-tier higher education, ensuring they are not left behind.

3. Are there any indicators mentioned or implied in the article that can be used to measure progress towards the identified targets?

1. Implied Indicator for Target 4.3 (Affordability): Ratio of higher education costs to average family income.
   • The article implies this by stating the goal is to find a college that “families earning an average income between $50,000-$150,000” can “afford with confidence.” Measuring the cost of college relative to this specific income bracket would be a direct way to track progress on affordability.
2. Implied Indicator for Target 4.3 (Accessibility): Participation rate in tertiary education for students with average academic records.
   • The article specifies that “The average GPA across all U.S. high schools is 3.0” and discusses the need for these “everyday students” to find a college they can “attend.” An indicator measuring the enrollment or acceptance rates for students with this academic profile would gauge progress on ensuring access for the non-elite majority.
3. Implied Indicator for Target 10.2 (Inclusion): Proportion of students from middle-income households enrolled in tertiary education.
   • By highlighting the specific income range of “$50,000-$150,000,” the article suggests a need to measure the participation of this economic group in higher education. Tracking this proportion would serve as an indicator of economic inclusion in the educational system.

4. Summary Table of SDGs, Targets, and Indicators

Source: duncanbanner.com